volfan2024
“Wanna play ball scarecrow “
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2005
- Messages
- 13,025
- Likes
- 2,843
Odd that the best team couldn't make it to the final four.
1. how exactly did the cardinals beat themselves when the steelers had to drive the length of the field with 2.37 to go to win?just like the cardinals did last night, the titans beat themselves. the cardinals were the better team on the field last night, but you can't win a game with that many penalty yards. that is essentially what gave the steelers a few touchdowns. coulda woulda shoulda, the cardinals still lost. the titans turnovers cost them the game, but they were still a better team than the ravens imo. but they both beat themselves and the steelers did just enough to wiggle a win. you could argue that the steelers are better because they won the superbowl and had the top ranked defense (blah,blah,blah), but i think a lot of teams were better than the cardinals and yet they still made it to the superbowl.
1. how exactly did the cardinals beat themselves when the steelers had to drive the length of the field with 2.37 to go to win?
2. yet there the cardinals were with less than three minutes to go with the lead, despite that 100 yards in penalties.
3. nothing was "given". these are typical remarks from people that have no idea what they are looking at when they watch a football game from only one perspective.
4. the titans are still better than the raves, in your opinion. well, who cares? i got a scoreboard that says your opinion means squat.
5. if you did argue that it'd be the only thing correct in this post.
1. how exactly did the cardinals beat themselves when the steelers had to drive the length of the field with 2.37 to go to win?
just like the cardinals did last night, the titans beat themselves. the cardinals were the better team on the field last night, but you can't win a game with that many penalty yards. that is essentially what gave the steelers a few touchdowns. coulda woulda shoulda, the cardinals still lost. the titans turnovers cost them the game, but they were still a better team than the ravens imo. but they both beat themselves and the steelers did just enough to wiggle a win. you could argue that the steelers are better because they won the superbowl and had the top ranked defense (blah,blah,blah), but i think a lot of teams were better than the cardinals and yet they still made it to the superbowl.
1. how exactly did the cardinals beat themselves when the steelers had to drive the length of the field with 2.37 to go to win?
2. yet there the cardinals were with less than three minutes to go with the lead, despite that 100 yards in penalties.
3. nothing was "given". these are typical remarks from people that have no idea what they are looking at when they watch a football game from only one perspective.
4. the titans are still better than the raves, in your opinion. well, who cares? i got a scoreboard that says your opinion means squat.
5. if you did argue that it'd be the only thing correct in this post.
well i can argue the same on your end. my post stated that both the titans and cardinals beat themselves. are you arguing that? the final drive by the steelers is not being contested in my post. they won the game when it mattered. and based on your scorecard that is all that matters. i am not arguing that. they won the superbowl, they will be considered the best team. but you can't sit here and tell me that because of cardinal penalties that the steelers did not get excellent field position consistently, and in fact on a couple of those drives they were basically moving down the field because of personal fouls on the cardinals. so don't tell me that the steelers were not helped out by cardinal penalties. the cardinals beat themselves, plain and simple. and if you want to be a steeler homer and say that they were not helped out by cardinal mistakes than we must have watched a different game. i still feel that the titans are a better team than the ravens and they still played better in that game, but turnovers killed them. i can't turn back the clock and change the outcome of either game, but i can argue that they are still a better team than the ravens.
The colossal mistake to end the first half resulted in a 14 point swing in a game that was ultimately decided by 4 points. Additionally, I think the Cards gave the Steelers three 15 yard penalties on one of their scoring drives. There were definitely some mistakes made.
the cards didn't give the interception to the steelers. it was caused by a great defensive play call, great defensive coaching, and harrison still had to catch the ball not to mention the incredible run to the endzone that was 100 yards away. you lose what credibility that you may have had if you don't give the steelers the majority of the credit there.
at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what you think.
but i think it naive to over look some things and just say the only reason the cards lost/steelers won was because of penalties against the cards. that's just not true.but do i think the penalties were the ultimate cause for the cardinals to lose than, yes
blupotato......relax.
you've stated over and over again that the cardinals mistakes are what led to the Steelers victory, and yes, they didn't hurt the cause.
but i think it naive to over look some things and just say the only reason the cards lost/steelers won was because of penalties against the cards. that's just not true.
I didn't say the Steelers deserve no credit, but if Kurt Warner doesn't make a mistake with his pass, they don't get a TD. That's just the way it is. I'm sure if you asked Warner about it, he'd say he made a mistake. Capitalizing on mistakes is what good football teams do. Congratulations, the Steelers managed to do just that.
look i am sick and tired of you steeler fans coming in and bashing people for their opinions. you know what, my opinion means just as much as yours and anyone elses on here. so there is really no need to get personal. i was simply stating that the cardinals gave up a lot of penalties on several drives to keep the steelers possession. you can be mean spirited about it because your beloved steelers won. but it is what it is. on paper the steelers look better. the steelers have the ring. i am not disputing that. but do i think the penalties were the ultimate cause for the cardinals to lose than, yes. they certainly did not help their cause. but i guess it doesn't matter because your opinion is the only important one and because your a so called football coach you know everything.
i agree with you jake. i am not upset, but i feel the need to defend myself when someone says that what someone posts has no value. were penalties the only thing that cost them the game, no. was the final drive spectacular, yes. did the steelers win, yes. in no way were those the only reasons that they lost. like i said before we can coulda woulda shoulda every play, but the outcome is what it is. i just don't understand all the hostility towards someone with a differing opinion. i respect fully what you have to say, and even if the three of us don't see eye to eye it shouldn't change the value of a posters thoughts and opinions.