LittleVol
Of course I can help you, Coach Heupel.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 22,104
- Likes
- 38,939
Bru is 6'3 220I'm confused, or maybe not aware of this kid actually. But his stats was in the 366 yards receiving at 17 catches this year?? Sure, that's like 21 YPC, but it's not even 2 receptions per game. Did they not throw to him or did he drop a bunch? And we have lots of booms going off. Completely get it if this is an invesment in potential and has two seasons to shine. He's Bru McCoy size.
Look at Hyatt’s numbers in 2021 and 2022. I think with our offense and coaches, we are likely to see much bigger numbers if he can beat out one of our other receivers.I'm confused, or maybe not aware of this kid actually. But his stats was in the 366 yards receiving at 17 catches this year?? Sure, that's like 21 YPC, but it's not even 2 receptions per game. Did they not throw to him or did he drop a bunch? And we have lots of booms going off. Completely get it if this is an invesment in potential and has two seasons to shine. He's Bru McCoy size.
I'm confused, or maybe not aware of this kid actually. But his stats was in the 366 yards receiving at 17 catches this year?? Sure, that's like 21 YPC, but it's not even 2 receptions per game. Did they not throw to him or did he drop a bunch? And we have lots of booms going off. Completely get it if this is an invesment in potential and has two seasons to shine. He's Bru McCoy size.
Bru McCoyI'm confused, or maybe not aware of this kid actually. But his stats was in the 366 yards receiving at 17 catches this year?? Sure, that's like 21 YPC, but it's not even 2 receptions per game. Did they not throw to him or did he drop a bunch? And we have lots of booms going off. Completely get it if this is an invesment in potential and has two seasons to shine. He's Bru McCoy size.
Paytons numbers are kinda the ones that stand out the best and tell a story. You might look at the 18 for 413 and be like meh... then you see the 6 TD's he had a specific role. Then the next year they basically expanded on that role to produce Hyatt.Bru McCoy
- USC 2020- 21 rec, 236 yds, 2 TD
- UT 2022- 52 rec, 667 yds, 4 TD
Velus Jones
- USC 4 year career stats- 58 rec, 630 yds, 4 TD
- UT 2021- 62 rec, 807 yds, 7 TD
JaVonta Payton
-career stats at MSU- 28 rec, 372 yds, 1 TD
-UT 2021- 18 rec, 413 yds, 6 TD
Heupel appears to know how to select great WR transfers and then get maximum production
Not knocking on him but Payton was a one-trick pony. He was fast and long. He could have just as easily done nothing and disappeared from memory.Paytons numbers are kinda the ones that stand out the best and tell a story. You might look at the 18 for 413 and be like meh... then you see the 6 TD's he had a specific role. Then the next year they basically expanded on that role to produce Hyatt.
Bru McCoy
- USC 2020- 21 rec, 236 yds, 2 TD
- UT 2022- 52 rec, 667 yds, 4 TD
Velus Jones
- USC 4 year career stats- 58 rec, 630 yds, 4 TD
- UT 2021- 62 rec, 807 yds, 7 TD
JaVonta Payton
-career stats at MSU- 28 rec, 372 yds, 1 TD
-UT 2021- 18 rec, 413 yds, 6 TD
Heupel appears to know how to select great WR transfers and then get maximum production
I think scheme enables him.I think of it like picking stocks when it comes to player evaluations. I don’t think it’s something anyone can do perfectly and the best you can hope for is to be slightly above average. Heupel May (I uncapitalized that 3x and autocorrect wasn’t having it) be above average as an evaluator.
But I think it’s more a matter of scheme than evaluation. Just like the number of times Mike Leach took unknown QBs (Heupel being one of them) and turned them into elite performers
You just described Hyatt with the one-trick pony bro...they just decided to use that one trick a lot more which is exactly why I said they expanded the role. They said hey let's do what we did with Payton but in the slot. Payton (6-1 175) was a slightly bigger version of Hyatt. (6 176 but seems smaller) similar speed even (4.43 vs 4.41) the real burner we had was Jones (4.31). Both Jones and Payton were more well-rounded WR's btw as they are both special teams guys and ran more route combos. Just saying I hope Hyatt gets drafted high and gets paid but in his time at UT he only did one thing period. Maybe in the NFL he gets to show more, once he puts on some serious weight because he won't survive as a slot WR in the NFL at 176 without a scheme to get him free. I would argue that Velus Jones and especially Tillman are much better long-term pro prospects as it stands today. Then again im a forum member not an NFL scout for a reason.Not knocking on him but Payton was a one-trick pony. He was fast and long. He could have just as easily done nothing and disappeared from memory.
I'm confused, or maybe not aware of this kid actually. But his stats was in the 366 yards receiving at 17 catches this year?? Sure, that's like 21 YPC, but it's not even 2 receptions per game. Did they not throw to him or did he drop a bunch? And we have lots of booms going off. Completely get it if this is an invesment in potential and has two seasons to shine. He's Bru McCoy size.
Wrong on a few accounts.You just described Hyatt with the one-trick pony bro...they just decided to use that one trick a lot more which is exactly why I said they expanded the role. They said hey let's do what we did with Payton but in the slot. Payton (6-1 175) was a slightly bigger version of Hyatt. (6 176 but seems smaller) similar speed even (4.43 vs 4.41) the real burner we had was Jones (4.31). Both Jones and Payton were more well-rounded WR's btw as they are both special teams guys and ran more route combos. Just saying I hope Hyatt gets drafted high and gets paid but in his time at UT he only did one thing period. Maybe in the NFL he gets to show more, once he puts on some serious weight because he won't survive as a slot WR in the NFL at 176 without a scheme to get him free. I would argue that Velus Jones and especially Tillman are much better long-term pro prospects as it stands today. Then again im a forum member not an NFL scout for a reason.
IMO, Heupel is seeing something more than just that. Not sure what it is but he's consistently getting production from guys who weren't all that productive elsewhere.
That is not correct. they sometimes ran him on a post out of a stack so he couldn't get jammed... but other than that he ran go routes and an occasional curl. He got open mostly because of the scheme, not route running. This is not saying he cannot run routes or is a bad route runner but in this offense its, not thing he did. the main reason is simple he is too small without scheme he would have gotten jammed off the line every snap. Most of his catches literally came on 1-2 receiver routes where the guys on the other side of the feild aren't even running routes. this means the scheme was set up to get them free. A lot of his TDs were based on single WR routes where he was literally the only throwing option. Options were throw it to him, run for your life or throw it away. There was an actual interview of Hyatt himself of his 5 TD's vs Bama where he broke it down in his own words. I am not saying he is not talented but find tape of him beating someone with a double move or head up beating a guy in man coverage.. it's not there. That is route running Tillman does it so did Bru 90% of the time if Hyatt got a catch he was 5 yards away from the best defender and it was him splitting a zone coverage. Show me one play where he beat man coverage straight off the line.. it may have happened but I don't remember it and I watched every game we played from start to finish and most of them 2-3 times. Didnt get to make any game in person last season but I'm going to the spring game and gonna try to catch a few home games this season.Wrong on a few accounts.
Hyatt was excellent catching bombs, but it wasn't his only skill. He was very good at route running and finding open zones. He caught passes over the middle all the time. He even had 3 tds where he had to make people miss to get the endzone.
Hyatt had more 30+ yard TDs plays than Velus. So how could you say Velus was the only "real burner"?
They both were and it was because of speed, of which Velus was not at Hyatt's top end.
Their 100 meter times and their film shows this.
That is not correct. they sometimes ran him on a post out of a stack so he couldn't get jammed... but other than that he ran go routes and an occasional curl. He got open mostly because of the scheme, not route running. This is not saying he cannot run routes or is a bad route runner but in this offense its, not thing he did. the main reason is simple he is too small without scheme he would have gotten jammed off the line every snap. Most of his catches literally came on 1-2 receiver routes where the guys on the other side of the feild aren't even running routes. this means the scheme was set up to get them free. A lot of his TDs were based on single WR routes where he was literally the only throwing option. Options were throw it to him, run for your life or throw it away. There was an actual interview of Hyatt himself of his 5 TD's vs Bama where he broke it down in his own words. I am not saying he is not talented but find tape of him beating someone with a double move or head up beating a guy in man coverage.. it's not there. That is route running Tillman does it so did Bru 90% of the time if Hyatt got a catch he was 5 yards away from the best defender and it was him splitting a zone coverage. Show me one play where he beat man coverage straight off the line.. it may have happened but I don't remember it and I watched every game we played from start to finish and most of them 2-3 times. Didnt get to make any game in person last season but I'm going to the spring game and gonna try to catch a few home games this season.
The first 4 plays in this video are Hyatt beating guys in man coverage.
Agree about Hyatt's weight. However, he was a better route runner. They did throw him screens and let him get short yardage. He worked the middle of the field. He ran short outs and slants. Similar maybe but Hyatt was a much better version.You just described Hyatt with the one-trick pony bro...they just decided to use that one trick a lot more which is exactly why I said they expanded the role. They said hey let's do what we did with Payton but in the slot. Payton (6-1 175) was a slightly bigger version of Hyatt. (6 176 but seems smaller) similar speed even (4.43 vs 4.41) the real burner we had was Jones (4.31). Both Jones and Payton were more well-rounded WR's btw as they are both special teams guys and ran more route combos. Just saying I hope Hyatt gets drafted high and gets paid but in his time at UT he only did one thing period. Maybe in the NFL he gets to show more, once he puts on some serious weight because he won't survive as a slot WR in the NFL at 176 without a scheme to get him free. I would argue that Velus Jones and especially Tillman are much better long-term pro prospects as it stands today. Then again im a forum member not an NFL scout for a reason.