what are you suggesting?
It sure seems that most people wanting the "rich" to pay more don't have an economic theory in mind other than "fairness". I've seen no one who can explain how jacking the upper rate will create jobs or help the middle class in any meaningful way other than temporary good feelings from sticking it to them.
I'll take a shot, not that I agree with it since I think both methods seem to be pretty inefficient in the current economic climate.
We have two ways to fight the defecit. Cut spending, increase revenue, or both.
Cutting spending at an impactful rate will most likely result in the loss of a lot of government jobs which will hit the middle class. Also a lot private jobs are from gov't contracts (a lot of Oak Ridge). Cuts in SS will also impact the middle class. Most likely all cuts will impact the lower and middle class a lot more than the wealthy.
Increase revenue. I prefer tax reform, but I think without a decrease in rates this will most likely be an increase to all classes. I don't think lowering rates will be an increase in revenue. My initial assumption is that we are on the left side of the Laffer Curve and have been since the 80s. So I think the question with tax increases is who can shoulder the load with less of a detrimental effect on the economy. The wealthy can probably still maintain their standard of living with an increase, but that will arguably result in less investment and job creation (trickle down). The poor and middle class currently don't pay as hefty of a share as the wealthy, but an increase on them results in a decrease in their consumer ability.
Therefore, if you don't believe in trickle down yet you still want a balanced budget, the least detrimental method of achieving that is to increase the tax rates on the wealthy. I think $250k is probably a poor number for that line.
Another side of this is a responsible government and solving the debt crisis would result in a more stable economy and more investment. An increase on rates to the wealthy to achieve this will most likely negate the potential recovery effects by spurning investments.
I think my conclusion is that cutting spending is going to hurt as well. But I still think it's the healthier path forward.