Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 45,118
- Likes
- 61,505
Opinion | Trump Is the Worst Kind of SocialistYou prefer "socialist"?
Opinion | Trump Is the Worst Kind of Socialist
^ The Wall Street Journal ^
Trump's Road to Socialism | Tho Bishop
^ Mises Institute ^ ... a libertarian, non-profit, think-tank headquartered in Auburn, Alabama
***************************************************
After 4 years of the Republican Party embracing big government with an expansionary fiscal policy under the Trump Administration, it amazes me that some of you still believe that there is a difference between the two parties.
The reality is that they both favor socialism. One of the party's acknowledges this reality (the Democratic Party), while the other tries to hide from what they have done (the Republican Party).
Some of you either don't know what socialism is, or else you have no capacity for self-awareness at all. Republicans had control of both chambers of Congress during Trump's first two years in office from 2017-2019. They chose to retain the status quo of an expansionary fiscal policy. That is a fact.
Wait, so it's the fault of the dems that the fiscal consecutive can't really be who they want to be? The fiscal conservatives only spend our money first so the dems can't have it?OK. I withdraw "socialist" and change to "communist". But you are actually working from the words of a "libertarian, non-profit, think-tank"? Gutsy move. So which side railroaded a national health plan of sorts? Sorry, the GOP may have lost it's way, but there's no real comparison between the two parties.
One point you need to strongly consider is that once people started buying votes - offering free "government" stuff, everybody had to play the game - the death of fiscal conservatism. Don't bring home the bacon and you don't stand a chance against the opposition. Don't put all the blame on the politicians; the electorate owns a lot of it. The GOP could absolutely take the high road ... and sit on the sidelines watching dems really plunder the treasury.
Wait, so it's the fault of the dems that the fiscal consecutive can't really be who they want to be? The fiscal conservatives only spend our money first so the dems can't have it?
... and The Wall Street Journal.OK. I withdraw "socialist" and change to "communist". But you are actually working from the words of a "libertarian, non-profit, think-tank"? Gutsy move. So which side railroaded a national health plan of sorts? Sorry, the GOP may have lost it's way, but there's no real comparison between the two parties.
One point you need to strongly consider is that once people started buying votes - offering free "government" stuff, everybody had to play the game - the death of fiscal conservatism. Don't bring home the bacon and you don't stand a chance against the opposition. Don't put all the blame on the politicians; the electorate owns a lot of it. The GOP could absolutely take the high road ... and sit on the sidelines watching dems really plunder the treasury.
Huh? Lots in here supported Trump making it rain all over. Trillions in more debt but it was the dems faultAint NOBODY on here supporting McConnell and this uniparty.
This goes back to either party reform or 3rd Party..I will take my chances on party reform if the Republicans can overcome this established leadership. Last time we saw the Tea Party..they were mocked endlessly with sexual innuendo. Ironic now.
Wait, so it's the fault of the dems that the fiscal consecutive can't really be who they want to be? The fiscal conservatives only spend our money first so the dems can't have it?
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”
― Alexander Fraser Tytler