BigOrangeAl 1979
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 4,198
- Likes
- 5,543
Show me the tweets/comments/etc. that indicate those three (or other prominent democrats) claimed the election was actually stolen in 2016. Go on, show me where they claimed Hillary got enough votes in enough states to reach 270 and was denied the White House due to election fraud. And no, saying Russia attempted to influence the election is not the same as saying the election was rigged.
That is not exactly an apples to apples comparison. The restrictions placed on the media's direct access to Biden have been self-imposed by his administration (Ron Klain). The restrictions placed on Trump's access to social media were handed down by the administrators of those platforms. Biden's restrictions were imposed because he is a hazard to himself, politically. Trump's restrictions were imposed because the administrators of those platforms have determined that his hyperbolic rhetoric is a hazard to others.They can't trust Biden with a real press conf. That's stunning
What social media companies choose to do is really irrelevant
That is not exactly an apples to apples comparison. The restrictions placed on the media's direct access to Biden have been self-imposed by his administration. The restrictions placed on Trump's access to social media were handed down by the administrators of those platforms. Biden's restrictions were imposed because he is a hazard to himself, politically. Trump's restrictions were imposed because his hyperbolic rhetoric is viewed as a hazard to others.
No Trump was removed because of politics. He's not a threat to anyone. They want compliance and controlThat is not exactly an apples to apples comparison. The restrictions placed on the media's direct access to Biden have been self-imposed by his administration. The restrictions placed on Trump's access to social media were handed down by the administrators of those platforms. Biden's restrictions were imposed because he is a hazard to himself, politically. Trump's restrictions were imposed because his hyperbolic rhetoric is viewed as a hazard to others.
The administrators of those social media platforms see it differently... and their evaluation counts more than yours does.No they aren't the same thing, it's 100x worse that a sitting POTUS can't be trusted to give a press conference.
And Trump posting on a social media site isn't a danger to anyone.
Bull ****.That is not true. He was removed because of the 1/6 Capitol incursion... which led to violence.
There is a big difference in someone who is being kept at arm's length from the press, because he is prone to committing embarrassing gaffes which could undermine his messaging, versus someone who has been a Putin apologist the last four years, when he is obviously a hostile actor against the United States.So, again, you're okay with someone you consider hazardous negotiating on behalf of the United States?