Trump's "Truth Social" Media Oxymoron Incarnate

#301
#301
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump accuses Cruz of 'fraud,' calls for new Iowa election

^^^^ This was during the Republican Party Primary in February of 2016. ^^^^

There is not a set of conditions from which Donald Trump could ever lose an election, without accusing his opponent of cheating. Trump's oversized ego wont allow him to admit that he actually lost legitimately under any circumstance.
Click to expand...

Trump is sad and pathetic, he doesn't have an ounce of integrity. If whining was an Olympic Sport, Trump would be a gold medalist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#302
#302
BowlBrother85 said:
For one thing, the Trump campaign did not object to those rule changes, which were put into effect to accommodate voters at high-risk of becoming critically ill with COVID, until after the election. They certainly had chances to. The Trump campaign could have filed suit to block those changes. They did not. That is enough to lead one to believe that they knew they were going to lose the election anyway, and wanted to have a ready-made excuse for the defeat after the election.

For another thing, there were safeguards in place to ensure that mail-in ballots were valid. There is no proof of widespread fraud significant enough in nature to change the outcome of even one state.

The election isn't invalid, just because you have hurt feelings.
Click to expand...

Literally everything you posted is ridiculously false. The facts are rules were changed to create a mass number of mail in ballots while safeguards to ensure these ballots were valid were removed. These facts that can't be disputed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
#305
#305
I’m over here wondering what actual policies affected the Loothers of the board negatively.
 
#308
#308
#310
#310
tnmarktx said:
Literally everything you posted is ridiculously false. The facts are rules were changed to create a mass number of mail in ballots while safeguards to ensure these ballots were valid were removed. These facts that can't be disputed.
Click to expand...
That is a joke. Everything YOU just posted was successfully disputed in court over a year ago. How long did it take you to create this fantasy world where only you reside? This is pathetic.

Literally, everything I posted is accurate.

3 FACTS

1) Prior to the election, the Trump campaign could have filed lawsuits to stop those changes from being implemented. They didn't. This fact was brought up by multiple judges when they filed suit after the election in December.

2) There were the standard checks and balances in place to verify the authenticity of mail-in ballots, and those procedures were followed by the appropriate personnel.

3) Systemic fraud, significant enough in nature to have altered the outcome of any one state, has still not been proven in the 13 months since Joe Biden took office. This is in spite of the unprecedented amount of scrutiny that the 2020 Presidential General Election results have been placed under through a wide array of recounts, hand recounts, forensic audits (including the partisan Republican Cyber Ninjas audit in Maricopa County, Arizona), bi-partisan Congressional investigations, a DOJ investigation led by Attorney General William Barr, and post-election lawsuits.

Your posts are an absurd mixture of sour grapes, partisan delusion and willful ignorance. You never support any of your opinionated claims with links to established facts. Your posts are completely driven by your Trump fan boy emotions combined with a hatred of Democrats. You are unsophisticated and full of nonsense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#312
#312
GroverCleveland said:
I could care less where Raffensperger agrees with me or not, although I've not heard him specifically address EITHER of the issues I brought up. And no one I've ever known has accused Republicans of being any good at cheating in elections. I've known and talked to too many people from Chicago, which is the gold-standard.
Click to expand...
Whenever Donald Trump loses an election, he is going to accuse his opponent of cheating. The facts do not matter. Republicans will always fall in line behind Trump when he makes these accusations of cheating, even when they have been made against a fellow Republican, such as Ted Cruz following the Iowa Caucuses in February of 2016. The question facing Republicans right now, is not whether they cheat, but whether or not they will ever have the backbone to stand up to Donald Trump.

As a possible hypothetical scenario, let's say that Ron DeSantis decides to run for President in 2024, and Donald Trump decides to run as well. Here are two pertinent questions for Republicans :

1) Under this scenario, if Ron DeSantis was to win the Iowa Caucuses in February of 2024, is there any doubt that Donald Trump would accuse the DeSantis campaign of cheating, and completely blame his loss on fraud, regardless of whether he could prove that or not? Try to be honest with yourself here. What does Donald Trump's track record suggest that he would do?

2) ... and is there any doubt that Republicans in Congress would fully support Donald Trump with his accusation against the DeSantis campaign, and make appearances on Fox News to help him undermine those results in Iowa?

Basically, Republicans don't have a problem with cheating. Republicans have a problem with missing backbones.
 
#313
#313
BowlBrother85 said:
Whenever Donald Trump loses an election, he is going to accuse his opponent of cheating. The facts do not matter. Republicans will always fall in line behind Trump when he makes these accusations of cheating, even when they have been made against a fellow Republican, such as Ted Cruz following the Iowa Caucuses in February of 2016. The question facing Republicans right now, is not whether they cheat, but whether or not they will ever have the backbone to stand up to Donald Trump.

As a possible hypothetical scenario, let's say that Ron DeSantis decides to run for President in 2024, and Donald Trump decides to run as well. Here are two pertinent questions for Republicans :

1) Under this scenario, if Ron DeSantis was to win the Iowa Caucuses in February of 2024, is there any doubt that Donald Trump would accuse the DeSantis campaign of cheating, and completely blame his loss on fraud, regardless of whether he could prove that or not? Try to be honest with yourself here. What does Donald Trump's track record suggest that he would do?

2) ... and is there any doubt that Republicans in Congress would fully support Donald Trump with his accusation against the DeSantis campaign, and make appearances on Fox News to help him undermine those results in Iowa?

Basically, Republicans don't have a problem with cheating. Republicans have a problem with missing backbones.
Click to expand...

Trump: ‘I’m afraid the election’s going to be rigged’

August, 2016
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#315
#315
LMAO.

Truth Social "launches" after a week or less of bug testing. Having been in the business, this is a surefire formula for failure. Gonna go out on a limb and guess Dumb Donald just got impatient and said do it... whether it's ready or not.

Well, it's not. Many users having issues registering and/or logging in.

The good news is Truth Social's technical issues will be solved as soon as Mexico pays for the firewall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#318
#318
But, but, but... Donald Trump told us he's a "stable genius"?!?!?

Trump Airlines

Trump Vodka

Trump Casinos

Trump: The Game

Trump Magazine

Trump Steaks

GoTrump.com

Trump University

Trump Mortgage

Etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#319
#319
BowlBrother85 said:
Whenever Donald Trump loses an election, he is going to accuse his opponent of cheating. The facts do not matter. Republicans will always fall in line behind Trump when he makes these accusations of cheating, even when they have been made against a fellow Republican, such as Ted Cruz following the Iowa Caucuses in February of 2016. The question facing Republicans right now, is not whether they cheat, but whether or not they will ever have the backbone to stand up to Donald Trump.

As a possible hypothetical scenario, let's say that Ron DeSantis decides to run for President in 2024, and Donald Trump decides to run as well. Here are two pertinent questions for Republicans :

1) Under this scenario, if Ron DeSantis was to win the Iowa Caucuses in February of 2024, is there any doubt that Donald Trump would accuse the DeSantis campaign of cheating, and completely blame his loss on fraud, regardless of whether he could prove that or not? Try to be honest with yourself here. What does Donald Trump's track record suggest that he would do?

2) ... and is there any doubt that Republicans in Congress would fully support Donald Trump with his accusation against the DeSantis campaign, and make appearances on Fox News to help him undermine those results in Iowa?

Basically, Republicans don't have a problem with cheating. Republicans have a problem with missing backbones.
Click to expand...

Good God man! Are you completely obsessed with and consumed by Donald Trump? And what, pray tell, does Trump hypothetically accusing DeSantis of cheating, have to do with what may/may not have happened in 2020?

I know a few people who are absolutely died-in-the-wool Trump supporters. Nothing phases them. They are no different than the few Bernie supporters I know in terms of toting water for their guy. AOC followers are the same. She has been poison for her district. Funny aside here: saw a man on the street type video where people in her district were interviewed and I think all but one said she had accomplished nothing or had actually been harmful for her district. On the last question, everyone of them said they would vote for her again. Every. Single. One. Choose any charismatic political creature and you'll find the same kind of psychosis in some of the followers.

While I do not know you, we probably disagree on what he accomplished. I think he was actually tried very hard to accomplish what he promised and was somewhat effective on the border, foreign policy, trade with China, economy, etc. I hope like hell he doesn't run. I'm pissed with him because he could not deal with the slings and arrows of his opponents and had to fight every single penny-ante insult that came his way in a schoolboy manner and setup the senile idiot to win the election and put the complete cast of incompetent dummköpfe in charge of the country. Well, I make an exception for Jen Psaki. That woman has the toughest job in America and I give her credit for battling everyday to make sh#t smell like it doesn't stink.
 
#321
#321
This sounds like quite the rollout even down to the questionable logo. Guess that's what you get with only 2 months of testing for such a complex project. Are there any IT people working there?
 
#323
#323
GroverCleveland said:
And what, pray tell, does Trump hypothetically accusing DeSantis of cheating, have to do with what may/may not have happened in 2020?
Click to expand...
My whole point, is that what may/may not have happened in 2020, is irrelevant to whether or not Donald Trump will allege that he was cheated in 2024, if he happens to lose again. When Donald Trump loses an election, he will always claim that it's because he was cheated, regardless of the rules and conditions under which the election was held, or his margin of defeat. The way Trump handled losing the 2016 Iowa Caucuses to Ted Cruz, and how closely that resembles the way he handled losing to Joe Biden in 2020 proves this. If there is no proof that he was cheated after losing an election, then Donald Trump will do his best to manufacture his own proof with lies - which his supporters will eagerly believe, and spread throughout social media. There is an established pattern here.
 
Last edited:
#324
#324
BowlBrother85 said:
That is a joke. Everything YOU just posted was successfully disputed in court over a year ago. How long did it take you to create this fantasy world where only you reside? This is pathetic.

Literally, everything I posted is accurate.

3 FACTS

1) Prior to the election, the Trump campaign could have filed lawsuits to stop those changes from being implemented. They didn't. This fact was brought up by multiple judges when they filed suit after the election in December.

2) There were the standard checks and balances in place to verify the authenticity of mail-in ballots, and those procedures were followed by the appropriate personnel.

3) Systemic fraud, significant enough in nature to have altered the outcome of any one state, has still not been proven in the 13 months since Joe Biden took office. This is in spite of the unprecedented amount of scrutiny that the 2020 Presidential General Election results have been placed under through a wide array of recounts, hand recounts, forensic audits (including the partisan Republican Cyber Ninjas audit in Maricopa County, Arizona), bi-partisan Congressional investigations, a DOJ investigation led by Attorney General William Barr, and post-election lawsuits.

Your posts are an absurd mixture of sour grapes, partisan delusion and willful ignorance. You never support any of your opinionated claims with links to established facts. Your posts are completely driven by your Trump fan boy emotions combined with a hatred of Democrats. You are unsophisticated and full of nonsense.
Click to expand...
Once again, all 3 of your points are false.

1. Trump did bring up prior to the election concerns about mass mail in ballots and cheating. Since elections aren't federal it's absurd to think he could've somehow changed the rules.
2. Signature verification was lifted, ballot drop boxes weren't monitored properly and the was no chain of custody, machine error rates were adjusted so that percentage of mail in ballots accepted were far greater than normal.
3. Fraud has absolutely not been dis-proven. The Maricopa audit did find a number significant enough to overturn Arizona's election to have enough issues to be invalidated. In those battle ground states election rules have been drastically changed to prevent the fraud that happened in 2020. As far as bi-partisan investigations by any DOJ personnel or congress, they are as legit as the 2020 election was.
 
#325
#325
tnmarktx said:
Once again, all 3 of your points are false.

1. Trump did bring up prior to the election concerns about mass mail in ballots and cheating. Since elections aren't federal it's absurd to think he could've somehow changed the rules.
2. Signature verification was lifted, ballot drop boxes weren't monitored properly and the was no chain of custody, machine error rates were adjusted so that percentage of mail in ballots accepted were far greater than normal.
3. Fraud has absolutely not been dis-proven. The Maricopa audit did find a number significant enough to overturn Arizona's election to have enough issues to be invalidated. In those battle ground states election rules have been drastically changed to prevent the fraud that happened in 2020. As far as bi-partisan investigations by any DOJ personnel or congress, they are as legit as the 2020 election was.
Click to expand...
1) The Trump campaign could have blocked those changes through lawsuits before the election. They did not. That fact was mentioned multiple times in court by judges overhearing the baseless claims from Trump campaign attorneys.

2) Ballot boxes were properly monitored, and there was a chain of custody.

3) Every single claim of systemic fraud made by Trump supporters involving the 2020 Presidential Election has been debunked. If you disagree, then name one specific allegation of widespread fraud that hasn't been de-bunked, and then watch me swiftly link proof which de-bunks it. You are typically very short on specific allegations. The partisan Maricopa County audit found a net gain of votes for Biden. You are lying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top