TrumPutinGate

This is a brief article from a former Wikileaks staffer, a member in the days when Wikileaks was actually a watchdog group and Putin hadn't yet gotten kompromat on Assange's rapes, thus turning the group into a Russian intelligence front thereafter:

https://patribotics.blog/2017/05/01...r-tweeted-a-bitcoin-address-not-his-password/

I am technologically unsavvy, so I can't make "heads or tails" (ah, thank you), but, if true, her finding is potentially explosive, although she admits she doesn't really even know what to make of it yet either.

Anyhow, since most of you won't even bother with it, she claims that Spicer actually tweeted out his Bitcoin account back in January, rather than a Twitter password, as was assumed at the time and still largely assumed today.
 
I completely agree:

https://twitter.com/20committee/status/859085163078307842

So-called "conservatives" allowing this to stand without repercussions is a dangerous precedent, which will potentially take us down a road we do not want to go.

Provided we still have a nation in 50, 100, 200 years, future generations of historians will not look back with admiration for the cowardice of an entire generation of men.

What illegal activity has he accused Obama of that he was wrong about?
 
Something I've been thinking about from that whiny "Why can't Donny be dictator!" rant of Preibus's yesterday on "This Week," who in the FBI told him that none of the information/allegations coming out about the Donny campaign and Russia were true?

So, yesterday, he literally said that members of the FBI had been to his office and told him none of it was true. This means, if he is telling the truth - which I highly doubt - that members of the FBI told a subject (member of the Donny campaign) of an active federal investigation that none of it was going to produce anything.

Ah, hello federal crime, anyone!

He was, of course, pulling that out of his rectum.
 
Something I've been thinking about from that whiny "Why can't Donny be dictator!" rant of Preibus's yesterday on "This Week," who in the FBI told him that none of the information/allegations coming out about the Donny campaign and Russia were true?

So, yesterday, he literally said that members of the FBI had been to his office and told him none of it was true. This means, if he is telling the truth - which I highly doubt - that members of the FBI told a subject (member of the Donny campaign) of an active federal investigation that none of it was going to produce anything.

Ah, hello federal crime, anyone!

He was, of course, pulling that out of his rectum.

Not like the Attorney General met with Melania on a plane or anything...
 
Not like the Attorney General met with Melania on a plane or anything...

Indeed.

That would actually be welcomed.

In this case, the Attorney General perjured himself over secretive talks with Russians and was a member of the same campaign currently under federal investigation.

You really walked right into that one, bham.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

Not an impeachable offense. Unwise? Sure. Impeachable? No.

and for other crimes

Need for it to be proved first. Speculation and innuendo isn't enough.

and/or signs of mental incompetency.

If incompetency was an impeachable offense, we wouldn't have a POTUS.

"His opinion."

It was. Doesn't make it a correct opinion, let alone a wise action of sharing it with the media without backing it up.

Jesus, you kill me.

Lol
 
Not an impeachable offense. Unwise? Sure. Impeachable? No.



Need for it to be proved first. Speculation and innuendo isn't enough.



If incompetency was an impeachable offense, we wouldn't have a POTUS.



It was. Doesn't make it a correct opinion, let alone a wise action of sharing it with the media without backing it up.



Lol

All are impeachable. Impeachable is arbitrary, up to the whims of a given Congress, and all determined by how it arbitrarily defines fitness for office.

Yes, in fact. All of what I mentioned is "impeachable." But obviously not impeachable in your eyes and obviously not impeachable in the eyes of this band of current traitor-lovers in Congress.
 
That's another funny thing about the last video clip. Trump again repeated his line on how we need to figure out what's going on.

As if the government is some big mystery and he can't find anyone to tell him how it works.

Can't find anyone to tell him or doesn't trust anyone who is telling him? Reports seem to be fairly consistent that he's having problems of paranoia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
All are impeachable. Impeachable is arbitrary, up to the whims of a given Congress, and all determined by how it arbitrarily defines fitness for office.

Yes, in fact. All of what I mentioned is "impeachable." But obviously not impeachable in your eyes and obviously not impeachable in the eyes of this band of current traitor-lovers in Congress.

Thank goodness that's not how it works. We would constantly be impeaching presidents leading to a constant power vacuum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
A brief history of Donny-Russia collusion on VolNation (initiated at least two months before this thread began):

Me: Wikileaks is a Russian intel front.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
17 US intelligence agencies: Wikileaks is a Russian intel front.

Me: Russia interfered in our election.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
17 US intelligence agencies: Russia interfered in our election.

Me: Trump is a traitor and is likely under investigation as such.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
Jim Comey: The Trump Campaign is under investigation for collusion with the Kremlin.

Me: This is going to keep getting worse and worse. The Flynn mess is just the beginning.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
Media/leaks: This is getting worse and worse, and the Flynn mess is just the beginning.

Me: Indictments are likely coming.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
David Ignatius of WaPo: Indictments are likely coming.

At what point do you begin to question your assumptions about who's crazy and who isn't?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Volprof,

You don't believe that it's in the intelligence communities best interest to attempt to discredit Wikileaks?

If you do believe it is, then you'll understand why no one believes them when they claim Wikileaks is a Russian front
 
A brief history of Donny-Russia collusion on VolNation (initiated at least two months before this thread began):

Me: Wikileaks is a Russian intel front.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
17 US intelligence agencies: Wikileaks is a Russian intel front.

Me: Russia interfered in our election.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
17 US intelligence agencies: Russia interfered in our election.

Me: Trump is a traitor and is likely under investigation as such.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
Jim Comey: The Trump Campaign is under investigation for collusion with the Kremlin.

Me: This is going to keep getting worse and worse. The Flynn mess is just the beginning.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
Media/leaks: This is getting worse and worse, and the Flynn mess is just the beginning.

Me: Indictments are likely coming.
Gaggle of Goofs: Volprof, you're crazy.
David Ignatius of WaPo: Indictments are likely coming.

At what point do you begin to question your assumptions about who's crazy and who isn't?
Volprof, you're crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: golfballs
Indeed.

That would actually be welcomed.

In this case, the Attorney General perjured himself over secretive talks with Russians and was a member of the same campaign currently under federal investigation.

You really walked right into that one, bham.

Perjured himself? Please.
 
Perjured himself? Please.

You're continuing to drift towards nihilism, bham.

It's sad to watch.

Although I do see you keeping the flame when it comes to Obama and his cronies.

So perhaps you'll just continue to dwell in relativism, or nihilism lite, as I call it.
 
Volprof, you're crazy.

Something tells me that even when Donny is filmed leaving the WH for the last time in complete legal and moral disgrace, ranting incoherently about "fake news" the whole while, you all will still be here to tell me how crazy I am. It's just what people who have been completely traumatized do to make sense out of their own delusions.
 
You're continuing to drift towards nihilism, bham.

It's sad to watch.

Although I do see you keeping the flame when it comes to Obama and his cronies.

So perhaps you'll just continue to dwell in relativism, or nihilism lite, as I call it.

Once again you confuse my refusal to buy into your view of events as support for Team Trump. Only partisans are labeling Sessions comments as perjury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Feel free to demonstrate such.

He's in legal violation every time he goes putting at one of his darned golf courses and charges the SS for use of his golf carts to follow him around, and yet Congress does nothing.

A far worse offense than lying about a BJ in the WH, and an actual Constitutional violation.

So, yeah, it's arbitrary, Spinoza.
 
Once again you confuse my refusal to buy into your view of events as support for Team Trump. Only partisans are labeling Sessions comments as perjury.

If you're not a Trump is a traitor believer you're an ant-American trumpeteer.
 
He's in legal violation every time he goes putting at one of his darned golf courses and charges the SS for use of his golf carts to follow him around, and yet Congress does nothing.

A far worse offense than lying about a BJ in the WH, and an actual Constitutional violation.

So, yeah, it's arbitrary, Spinoza.

Where did you get you're law degree UF?
 

VN Store



Back
Top