TheDeeble
Guy on the Couch
- Joined
- May 6, 2007
- Messages
- 9,386
- Likes
- 7,775
Louise Mensch, the great American hero and patriot who just happens to be British, has learned from her SOURCES (extra WAPO) that not only is there a sealed indictment "granted" against our President, Donald J Trump, which will be the basis of his impeachment, but also that the Justice Department is already gathering US Marshalls to take the despot into custody. Get ready, Trumpsters, your day in the electric chair approaches.
The U.S. Marshals Service presented a plan to a senior Justice Department official yesterday for the service of warrants in the Trump-Russia inquiry, separate sources with links to the intelligence and law enforcement communities report.
The extensive plan was approved yesterday by a senior Justice Department official who is closely involved in prosecuting the case.
Sources say that the extensive plan, multiple pages in length, covered not only the serving of warrants, but logistical arrangements such as the closure of streets, if necessary.
They further report that while timing is uncertain, such plans are normally only presented and approved when arrests are imminent.
Patribotics knows the identity of the senior justice official who approved the plan, and the court in which it was approved. We are redacting that information for now.
More on this story as it develops.
Edited:
I want to acknowledge the following tweets by Claude Taylor made last night. My sources support his sources (and go further). He has asked me to reproduce them exactly as written.
1. Followers know Ive tried to avoid an exact timeline as to when to expect arrests. Im now receiving word that it may be soon. Heres why
2. In order to avoid any possible misinterpretation, Im going to give exact word for word quote of what I was told. Rumor has it the AUSA
3. has signed off on the tactical & logistical plan to take numerous subjects into custody. Thats it. Word for word.
@LouiseMensch and I are reporting that a sealed indictment has been issued against Trump by FISA court to serve as the basis of Impeachment.
This aspect of the claim is demonstrably not true. New York University law professor Christopher Jon Sprigman told us in a phone interview that the FISA court exists for one purpose only, and that is to grant surveillance warrants:
With respect to the FISA court, that court doesnt issue indictments. It considers requests for surveillance authority by intelligence agencies and it grants what are refered to as FISA warrants. With the respect to the sealed indictment, indictments are typically what grand juries do and the FISA court has no power to convene a grand jury. The FISA court is a special purpose court.
Figured I'd check out the Dems holy grail of truther information Snopes on this...
He then backtracked with the Tweets you provided... Funny how the same people bashing Trump for "backtracking" on Tweets are literally doing the same thing.
This is all hilarious.
But Claude worked for the Clintons!
[twitter]https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/864579105018216453[/twitter]
Lol, right...
The difference between you and I is that I apply a critical, thinking eye to these claims. They are just so outrageous that, on their face, I am extremely skeptical.
When the roles are reversed, you leap at them if they come from the alt right. When they turn out a week later to have no merit, you find ways to excuse it. When a month later, its still not true, you bend over backwards even more with some tortured explanation of why it still might be true.
Three months later, and still nothing, you explain how they almost had it right, and something about Obama, Clinton, and Pizzagate, and all is right with the world again.
The difference between you and I is that I apply a critical, thinking eye to these claims. They are just so outrageous that, on their face, I am extremely skeptical.
When the roles are reversed, you leap at them if they come from the alt right. When they turn out a week later to have no merit, you find ways to excuse it. When a month later, its still not true, you bend over backwards even more with some tortured explanation of why it still might be true.
Three months later, and still nothing, you explain how they almost had it right, and something about Obama, Clinton, and Pizzagate, and all is right with the world again.
you and me.The difference between you and I is that I apply a critical, thinking eye to these claims. They are just so outrageous that, on their face, I am extremely skeptical.
When the roles are reversed, you leap at them if they come from the alt right. When they turn out a week later to have no merit, you find ways to excuse it. When a month later, its still not true, you bend over backwards even more with some tortured explanation of why it still might be true.
Three months later, and still nothing, you explain how they almost had it right, and something about Obama, Clinton, and Pizzagate, and all is right with the world again.
Comey Memo Says Trump Asked Him to End Flynn Investigation
Sanders and Kasich on CNN calling it a sad day in America. Both calling for special committees, Sanders asking for special prosecutor, Kasich saying it may end up being necessary. Kasich - not to impeachment level - yet. Both adamant about further and more intensive Trump/Russia collusion investigation. Both agree that there was Russian interference in the election that impacted the election. Kasich, "quit talking about Clinton e-mails and get to the bottom of the Russian story."
Sanders and Kasich on CNN calling it a sad day in America. Both calling for special committees, Sanders asking for special prosecutor, Kasich saying it may end up being necessary. Kasich - not to impeachment level - yet. Both adamant about further and more intensive Trump/Russia collusion investigation. Both agree that there was Russian interference in the election that impacted the election. Kasich, "quit talking about Clinton e-mails and get to the bottom of the Russian story."