TrumPutinGate

#10,352
#10,352
tumscalcium said:
Someone is really mad and it sure doesn't sound like it's the guy who's candidate is in office. Lol


Your tears taste delicious.
Click to expand...

You've drunken no one's tears on here.

In fact, we're all now dumber having simply read your posts.

You win no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,356
#10,356
golfballs said:
You clearly don't watch Fox News.

They've been critical of Trump for a while.

The network is more fair and balanced than any other
Click to expand...

If by "fair and balanced," you mean "whipping viewers up into a trailer park frenzy," then yes, Fox News is more "fair and balanced" than any other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10,359
#10,359
tumscalcium said:
He mad.

So much anger on here.
Click to expand...

For a great deal of this site's posters, this thread is now definitive proof of how stupid they are.

In such a light, the continued delusion makes a little more sense. It's not easy having to admit that the guy you've been accusing of being "mental" for around a year is actually much smarter than yourself.

Hypothetical "you," of course.
 
#10,363
#10,363
FLVOL69 said:
Thought you were a CNN honk
Click to expand...

If I wanted to merely wait anywhere between two weeks to two months (if not more) to learn what's already happened, I would consult CNN only.

With Twitter, I typically learn what has happened months in advance of the rest of the nation. You just have to know who is legit and who isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,364
#10,364
FLVOL69 said:
Are those the same pollsters that said Hillary had a 99.9% chance of winning? Lmfao
Click to expand...

Hillary did have a 99.9% chance of winning. That means she had a 0.1% of not winning. (I used my calculator again) You have a 99.999% chance of not getting struck by lightening, but those odds don't mean much to the guy that gets struck. The fact that Trump won when the odds were so low, adds fuel to the fire that something unusual may have happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,365
#10,365
luthervol said:
Hillary did have a 99.9% chance of winning. That means she had a 0.1% of not winning. (I used my calculator again) You have a 99.999% chance of not getting struck by lightening, but those odds don't mean much to the guy that gets struck. The fact that Trump won when the odds were so low, adds fuel to the fire that something unusual may have happened.
Click to expand...

Not fuel, it just shows how outta touch your party is.
 
#10,366
#10,366
The Peter Smith suicide is going to be interesting for investigators.

Unfortunately, a good deal of any evidence may have already been destroyed since authorities originally had no idea what Smith was involved in at the time and just took it for granted that it was a suicide.

We may end up having an actual "Vince Foster," which of course was always nonsense.

Could have been Vlad. Could have been Donny. Never underestimate Donny's ability to turn the Clintons into Washington and Lincoln though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10,367
#10,367
volprof said:
If I wanted to merely wait anywhere between two weeks to two months (if not more) to learn what's already happened, I would consult CNN only.

With Twitter, I typically learn what has happened months in advance of the rest of the nation. You just have to know who is legit and who isn't.
Click to expand...

Yet you bemoan Trump for tweeting to his constituents 😂
 
#10,368
#10,368
volprof said:
For a great deal of this site's posters, this thread is now definitive proof of how stupid they are.

In such a light, the continued delusion makes a little more sense. It's not easy having to admit that the guy you've been accusing of being "mental" for around a year is actually much smarter than yourself.

Hypothetical "you," of course.
Click to expand...

Lol. You post this from the insane asylum which finally granted you CPU access after a couple months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,370
#10,370
FLVOL69 said:
Yet you bemoan Trump for tweeting to his constituents 😂
Click to expand...

Again, as I said, you have to know who is legit and who isn't.

Neither Donny nor his debased, vile minions are legit. Simply cellar dwellers, who the GOP temporarily let out in 2016, and who Bobby Three Sticks and other patriots will take care of in 2017-2018.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,371
#10,371
volprof said:
Again, as I said, you have to know who is legit and who isn't.

Neither Donny nor his debased, vile minions are legit. Simply cellar dwellers, who the GOP temporarily let out in 2016, and who Bobby Three Sticks and other patriots will take care of in 2017-2018.
Click to expand...

Sure thing Cletus
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9365.JPG
    IMG_9365.JPG
    42 KB · Views: 36
#10,372
#10,372
luthervol said:
Hillary did have a 99.9% chance of winning. That means she had a 0.1% of not winning. (I used my calculator again) You have a 99.999% chance of not getting struck by lightening, but those odds don't mean much to the guy that gets struck. The fact that Trump won when the odds were so low, adds fuel to the fire that something unusual may have happened.
Click to expand...

Or you're just making up numbers again.
 
#10,374
#10,374
I'm going to go ahead and say it now, although it's probably a good 2-3 years off still, but do not be surprised when you finally learn that Donny's Russian mob business has placed him in business with ISIS and the Iranian government.

A double whammy of Islamic radicalism.

But, for now, the Russian thing will dominate a good couple of years or so. Donny has dipped his toes in to so many things it will literally take a good decade or more to unravel it all for the public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top