TrumPutinGate

[volprof]

Is that why she deleted 30,000 ****ing emails after she had been served a congressional subpoena ?

I didn't realize that once you delete an email, it's just gone forever.

I am, however, relieved to know that.

 

[golfballs]

And yeah - we needed Wikileaks to tell us the Clintons, Democrats, and media are corrupt 🙄

Nothing we didn't already know. It just served as reinforcements

I will say that, I was previously unaware of John Podestas fondness for walnut sauce, cheese and pasta dominos, and spirit cooking

Let's not forget however, that if there was a pivotal point, in highlighting Hillary Clinton's corruption, it was Comey's investigation into her private server and mishandling of classified information. That literally had nothing to do with the Russians. The Russians didn't make her set up a private server and email classified info to Huma and her perverted husband

All this other **** so-far is just conjured up distraction from her crimes.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Just recently you wanted me to lie about not knowing your position on something only so you can admit that I do know your position.

Pretty weird stuff. Mental even.

You are seriously illiterate. I said that you accused me of holding a specific viewpoint without any evidence. I've never admitted you were correct. In fact, you were wrong.

I think it all stems from your constant need to categorize people. Not everyone fits into your predetermined boxes. Sometimes you have to read and comprehend the other persons argument, but you don't have the patience for such tom foolery. Easier just to create strawmen. Anyhoo, you may carry on with your ignorance.

 

[tumscalcium]

Wrong.

They did not expose them to the truth. They only gave them one highly skewed version of the truth, without offering the rest of the full picture.

At this point, I have no idea why you all keep trying, but, I suppose if I were ever stupid enough to dig myself in this position, I could understa....no, no.

What was the full picture?

 

[tumscalcium]

You are seriously illiterate. I said that you accused me of holding a specific viewpoint without any evidence. I've never admitted you were correct. In fact, you were wrong.

I think it all stems from your constant need to categorize people. Not everyone fits into your predetermined boxes. Sometimes you have to read and comprehend the other persons argument, but you don't have the patience for such tom foolery. Easier just to create strawmen. Anyhoo, you may carry on with your ignorance.

So you don't want any of these Muslim refugees here?

 

[FLVOL69]

Repetition and inundation. You're off the hook (or completely on it) because you voted for him in the primaries. For the millions that said they hated Trump but just couldn't vote for Hillary, the psychological impact of the Russian misinformation campaign could very well have been the difference maker.

*

 

[golfballs]

Wrong.

They did not expose them to the truth. They only gave them one highly skewed version of the truth, without offering the rest of the full picture.

At this point, I have no idea why you all keep trying, but, I suppose if I were ever stupid enough to dig myself in this position, I could understa....no, no.

A skewed version of the truth? Wut?

Wikileaks released actual documents. Emails, written by actual people at the DNC and Hillarys campaign.

 

[1972 Grad]

Cheap Chinese calculator

Abacus?

 

[1972 Grad]

You've drunken no one's tears on here.

In fact, we're all now dumber having simply read your posts.

You win no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

drunken?

 

[golfballs]

drunken?

*done dranken

 

[1972 Grad]

Well, you just proved you're a nut job.

Just??? Where have you been?

 

[hog88]

No, they didn't get you to change your vote. Nothing the Russians did influenced your vote. You have always been a Trumper, as I've said. You're one of the select-breed "I could murder someone on 5th Ave..." Trumpers.

Russians had no effect on you.

Rather, the Russians did indeed influence morally upright Americans, torn between two awful decisions. The desire of many for something new and reform was serious, legitimate, and understandable. But they were still cautious about Donny's moral character, and rightfully so.

But, at the end of the day, the overwhelming "evidence" of Clinton's corruption, influenced by Wikileaks, fake news, online bots, and other Russian-influence ops were too much for some of them, and without question affected at least 70,000 (basically, the difference in the electoral final) American voters' minds, especially those who were specifically targeted by Donny's digital campaign and RIS active measures in specific swing states and specific precincts.

I would wager far more than that number too.

Mess with the bull, bronco, and you get the horns.

Considering you are a cow......

 

[GAVol]

Repetition and inundation. You're off the hook (or completely on it) because you voted for him in the primaries. For the millions that said they hated Trump but just couldn't vote for Hillary, the psychological impact of the Russian misinformation campaign could very well have been the difference maker.

Keep dreaming. Hillary was never going to attract independents in droves.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

So you don't want any of these Muslim refugees here?

There you go trying to create absolutes.

I don't want any Muslim extremists refugees here. I also don't want too many of any refugees here. I want and believe that we have a duty to help. However, that doesn't have to mean bringing all refugees here. We can provide aid where they live.

As to Muslim refugees specifically (and really any immigrant that comes from a third world country where records may be lacking), we need to be careful when vetting them to minimize our risk.

Any more questions?

 

[tumscalcium]

drunken?

I drunken dem all

 

[1972 Grad]

That was because he was legally and legitimately your president. He didn't come to power in a coup.

Now, back to the Kremlin walls.

He was born in frickin' Kenya or something.

 

[hog88]

Of course it didn't answer anything for you, because you're not intelligent.

I've already told you, there will be no President Pence. Stop saying this.

There will likely be no President Ryan either, since it is a fact from that tape that he knew of the collusion, especially now in light of Problem Child's meeting.

A President Ryan, however, is still up for debate I suppose, especially given this nation's moral decay.

But there will be no President Pence and no attempt at turning the nation into a giant Christian Dominionist sect.

Of that, you can rest assured.

You don't think either will run in 2024? I would have bet money Ryan would run after Trumps 2nd term.

 

[Grand Vol]

To deny that is simply foolish. He won the election. Nothing illegal has been proven. There are some concerning events, but nothing yet discovered that gets near impeachment requirements. I wish the shriekers would hold off passing judgment until the investigation is complete.

You keep this up and you're going to end up having a "Trump/Pence 2020" sign in your yard.

 

[luthervol]

*

That number is a little high. There's an equal if not greater number that feel Clinton would have made the best president ever. I think we can take the 25% extreme from each side, and focus on that remaining 50%. You could really take the 40% hard core from each side and talk about the remaining 20%. That's where elections are won and that's where Russia interference was targeted.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

You keep this up and you're going to end up having a "Trump/Pence 2020" sign in your yard.

Not even close, but just because I didn't support him and disagree with many of his policies doesn't mean I don't recognize him as president and wouldn't give him respect commensurate with the office.

 

[Grand Vol]

And does anyone still serious question why I have certain people on ignore?

It's not because I can't "handle" the conversations/debates/answer questions. It's because I literally cannot beat myself retarded enough to even think on that level.

 

[volprof]

And yeah - we needed Wikileaks to tell us the Clintons, Democrats, and media are corrupt ��

Nothing we didn't already know. It just served as reinforcements

I will say that, I was previously unaware of John Podestas fondness for walnut sauce, cheese and pasta dominos, and spirit cooking

Let's not forget however, that if there was a pivotal point, in highlighting Hillary Clinton's corruption, it was Comey's investigation into her private server and mishandling of classified information. That literally had nothing to do with the Russians. The Russians didn't make her set up a private server and email classified info to Huma and her perverted husband

All this other **** so-far is just conjured up distraction from her crimes.

You're drifting further and further into mental illness, Golfballs.

As a poster who has been encouraged to seek help, I commiserate.

 

[hog88]

And does anyone still serious question why I have certain people on ignore?

It's not because I can't "handle" the conversations/debates/answer questions. It's because I literally cannot beat myself retarded enough to even think on that level.

Don't sell yourself short, sure you can.

 

[Grand Vol]

Not even close, but just because I didn't support him and disagree with many of his policies doesn't mean I don't recognize him as president and wouldn't give him respect commensurate with the office.

Buy now before they are gone!

 

[1972 Grad]

And does anyone still serious question why I have certain people on ignore?

It's not because I can't "handle" the conversations/debates/answer questions. It's because I literally cannot beat myself retarded enough to even think on that level.

We have faith in your abilities.