TrumPutinGate

Have you not been paying attention? Dems are saying because K isn't demanding an FBI investigation he must be guilty. Glad you agree they are 100% wrong and it's a stupid argument.

But not said divorced from any context. Ford has made the accusation and asked for an investigation. Kavanaugh has denied it and his name has been sullied. There will be no investigation unless asked for by the senate or wh, neither of which wants the investigation. So I think what folks are saying is that there is a clear and much more impartial way to get this cleared up--have the FBI investigate to discern the facts. Kavanaugh has interest in having his name cleared by a neutral third party and the senate and president would likely ask for such an investigation if Kavanaugh publicly demanded it. In that context, they're saying Kavanaugh should also demand it, given his interest in this not having this taint hanging over him and his name being cleared by a neutral body.
 
But not said divorced from any context. Ford has made the accusation and asked for an investigation. Kavanaugh has denied it and his name has been sullied. There will be no investigation unless asked for by the senate or wh, neither of which wants the investigation. So I think what folks are saying is that there is a clear and much more impartial way to get this cleared up--have the FBI investigate to discern the facts. Kavanaugh has interest in having his name cleared by a neutral third party and the senate and president would likely ask for such an investigation if Kavanaugh publicly demanded it. In that context, they're saying Kavanaugh should also demand it, given his interest in this not having this taint hanging over him and his name being cleared by a neutral body.

I'll ask again, have you heard the actual comments from Hirono, Gillibrand, etc? They specifically say he's to be deemed guilty specifically since he is not asking for an FBI investigation. This completely ignores his immediate and consistent interest in testifying under oath about the incident. We all know that being interviewed by the committee will be a much more hostile setting than being interviewed by the FBI in a background check situation.

Whether one thinks this should start with an FBI investigation (still not sure what that means) it's absurd to label him guilty BECAUSE he isn't asking for said FBI investigation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
Wow if that article is true (unnamed sources and what not!) rod is obviously in waaaaaaay over his head.

“Hey do you guys think it would be ok to call up the guy I just got fired and ask his opinion on something related to investigating POTUS? No?! Why the hell not!”

Wow...
 
Wow if that article is true (unnamed sources and what not!) rod is obviously in waaaaaaay over his head.

“Hey do you guys think it would be ok to call up the guy I just got fired and ask his opinion on something related to investigating POTUS? No?! Why the hell not!”

Wow...
Sounds to me like he was well aware that Trump was unfit to hold the office and needed to leave. That seems to be a common thread that some of you continually miss.
 
Sounds to me like he was well aware that Trump was unfit to hold the office and needed to leave. That seems to be a common thread that some of you continually miss.

You honestly believe this garbage?

He was elected by millions of Americans.

How can you believe a deputy AG should be allowed to decide if a president is fit for office?

It's shameful.
 
You honestly believe this garbage?

He was elected by millions of Americans.

How can you believe a deputy AG should be allowed to decide if a president is fit for office?

It's shameful.
He was elected with 306 electoral votes. Get it right.
 
Hillary had millions more. And that didn't mean crap.

But he wasn’t talking about how many hills had vs Trump he just said millions of Americans . Which is true . He just happen to also have more electorial votes ( thank you founding fathers )
 

VN Store



Back
Top