TrumPutinGate

#19,030
#19,030
Mick said:
Manafort held secret talks with Assange 3 times.

According to the Guardian.
Click to expand...

WikiLeaks denied the report’s claims.

“Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial fabricator to totally destroy the paper’s reputation. @wikileaks is willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor’s head that Manafort never met Assange,” it said in a tweet.

I'm going to trust WikiLeaks on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, ajvol01, Matt2496 and 1 other person
#19,031
#19,031
theFallGuy said:
WikiLeaks denied the report’s claims.

“Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial fabricator to totally destroy the paper’s reputation. @wikileaks is willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor’s head that Manafort never met Assange,” it said in a tweet.

I'm going to trust WikiLeaks on this one.
Click to expand...
😂😂😂 read their twitter feed. They’ve doubled and tripled down on that statement too. Both cannot be right!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and ajvol01
#19,033
#19,033
Obsessed said:
Proof of collusion and collusion being a crime.

Thanks.
Click to expand...
You are correct that the Trump defense will now spin away from "No collusion!" into "Collusion is not a crime!"... but either way, it does mean that Trump has been lying this whole time. Even Dershowitz is now saying that the Mueller report will be devastating politically for Trump. No wonder he's going off the rails on Twitter.
 
#19,034
#19,034
BowlBrother85 said:
Wow... if this is true and Manafort was foolish enough to go to the Ecuadorian embassy to meet with Assange in March of 2016... and was then hired by the Trump campaign as it's manager AND then attended the meeting at Trump Tower with Donald Jr and Jared Kushner on June 9, 2016... there was freaking collusion out the ying yang.
Click to expand...

Easy to verify considering Assange is holed up in the embassy and there will be recorded logs for visitors in and out of that compound. If there's no record, then what?
 
#19,035
#19,035
theFallGuy said:
WikiLeaks denied the report’s claims.

“Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial fabricator to totally destroy the paper’s reputation. @wikileaks is willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor’s head that Manafort never met Assange,” it said in a tweet.

I'm going to trust WikiLeaks on this one.
Click to expand...
Sure... why not trust an actor who is hostile to the United States? Anything that protects Trump, right?
 
#19,036
#19,036
theFallGuy said:
WikiLeaks denied the report’s claims.

“Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial fabricator to totally destroy the paper’s reputation. @wikileaks is willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor’s head that Manafort never met Assange,” it said in a tweet.

I'm going to trust WikiLeaks on this one.
Click to expand...
Wikileak's platform has been relegated to tweets. Too Funny.
 
#19,037
#19,037
ETV said:
Easy to verify considering Assange is holed up in the embassy and there will be recorded logs for visitors in and out of that compound. If there's no record, then what?
Click to expand...
Then the Guardian was wrong... not a big deal. If there is a record, then what?
 
#19,038
#19,038
Then the guardian is more than wrong, it was a fabricated story that they ran without verification. If there's a record, we will all want to know.
 
#19,040
#19,040
Manafort didn’t sign into the Embassy. That’s mandatory entering the Embassy. Where’s the proof?

On another note, why have the Dims tried so hard to silence Assange? They must plenty to hide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01 and volfanjustin
#19,041
#19,041
AirVol said:
Manafort didn’t sign into the Embassy. That’s mandatory entering the Embassy. Where’s the proof?

On another note, why have the Dims tried so hard to silence Assange? They must plenty to hide.
Click to expand...
Silence Assange? Really AV? Pretty sure they want him to stand trial. And speaking of plenty to hide, Who is hiding in that Embassy?
 
#19,042
#19,042
AirVol said:
Manafort didn’t sign into the Embassy. That’s mandatory entering the Embassy. Where’s the proof?

On another note, why have the Dims tried so hard to silence Assange? They must plenty to hide.
Click to expand...

They have a document from the Ecuadorian Government where Manafort signed in as Paul Manaford.
 
#19,045
#19,045
titansvolsfaninga said:
You know that you all are literally a minority in the US correct....look at the actual vote totals. The house had been gerrymandered to no end to ensure that you all held on to power, but that ended. Resist is what the cons did for 8 years with PBO....what we are doing now is getting you all out of office. You say resist, we say we are installing people that reflect America and what America actually looks like.
Click to expand...

Oh I know what the conservatives are in the house , I also know all Dems have screeched for two years is resist . While we are on the “knowing of things “ you do realize that you are the majority now right ? You do know that it’s the House and not the Senate right? You know the House with the majority is supposed to actually do something besides just resist right ? Now that you have control over the big house you can’t say “well it was the Rs fault they wouldnt do anything “ , you own it now what are you going to do with it ?
 
#19,046
#19,046
Mick said:
Silence Assange? Really AV? Pretty sure they want him to stand trial. And speaking of plenty to hide, Who is hiding in that Embassy?
Click to expand...

Come on man, the Dims loved Assange until he dumped on the DNC.

Pamela Anderson is hiding there. He needs some love too, he’s human.
 
#19,048
#19,048
AirVol said:
Manafort didn’t sign into the Embassy. That’s mandatory entering the Embassy. Where’s the proof?

On another note, why have the Dims tried so hard to silence Assange? They must plenty to hide.
Click to expand...
They hate Wikileaks because they portrayed the Democrat machine in less than favorable light. Same as when the Republicans wanted to hang Assange when Bush was portrayed less than favorable. They'll come back around to loving Assange when he publishes some dirt on Trump because, like Republicans, the Democrats have no principals.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top