TrumPutinGate

#21,801
#21,801
hog88 said:
Real efficient letting a supposed traitor stay in office for over two years.
Click to expand...
Time to give that angle a rest. It's been overplayed and makes little sense. If Mueller came out and said the investigation leads a reasonable person to conclude that Trump colluded with Putin, all of the unreasonable nuts (35 percenters) would go apocalyptic......screaming Deep State, Hillary, butthurt, and TDS. If Mueller was only providing the results of the investigation to reasonable people, it could be concluded much faster, but he is having to idiot proof it. Just look at how the evidence to date has been received by the redhatters.
 
#21,802
#21,802
37L1 said:
Your sources are whom, Cohen through unnamed sources through CNN? That does not quite rise to the level of "evidence."
Click to expand...
Which part to you refute?
Trump didn't know about the meeting?
Trump didn't lie about the meeting?
Trump didn't help little donnie create a cover story that has been proven to be a lie?
 
#21,803
#21,803
luthervol said:
Time to give that angle a rest. It's been overplayed and makes little sense. If Mueller came out and said the investigation leads a reasonable person to conclude that Trump colluded with Putin, all of the unreasonable nuts (35 percenters) would go apocalyptic......screaming Deep State, Hillary, butthurt, and TDS. If Mueller was only providing the results of the investigation to reasonable people, it could be concluded much faster, but he is having to idiot proof it. Just look at how the evidence to date has been received by the redhatters.
Click to expand...

Please explain to us unreasonable people why the Muell would give a good damn what the 35 percenters think or what they scream? What's more important, the security and sovereignty of our nation or the opinion of only 35% of it's people? What the hell would they do anyway, it's not like they have a vote on him being removed from office or if he would be tried. Face it, that is a piss poor excuse!
 
#21,804
#21,804
luthervol said:
Which part to you refute?
Trump didn't know about the meeting?
Trump didn't lie about the meeting?
Trump didn't help little donnie create a cover story that has been proven to be a lie?
Click to expand...
How would you like to be put on trial with that kind of "evidence"?

I don't have to refute anything because what you quoted as "evidence" does not meet the definition of "evidence" but is a lot closer to "hearsay", but not even that, since it comes from unnamed sources relating what a known liar like Cohen supposedly told some unknown investigator. Until it is real evidence, I wouldn't put any stock in it other than you are "hopeful" that someday this might become evidence. And that's giving you a whole lot of benefit of the doubt, luther.
 
#21,805
#21,805
[whispers: the investigation is ongoing, and as long as it is, we're not going to be privy to most of the evidence]
 
#21,807
#21,807
hog88 said:
There is no evidence, otherwise the Muell would have already moved to have him removed.
Click to expand...

These guys hopes are equivalent to being down 40 points in the 4th qtr and thinking you have a chance to score 6 tds and get 5 onside kicks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#21,808
#21,808
37L1 said:
How would you like to be put on trial with that kind of "evidence"?

I don't have to refute anything because what you quoted as "evidence" does not meet the definition of "evidence" but is a lot closer to "hearsay", but not even that, since it comes from unnamed sources relating what a known liar like Cohen supposedly told some unknown investigator. Until it is real evidence, I wouldn't put any stock in it other than you are "hopeful" that someday this might become evidence. And that's giving you a whole lot of benefit of the doubt, luther.
Click to expand...
Which is why the investigation continues. You know that Trump knew about the meeting. You know he lied about it. You know he helped little donnie concoct a lie as cover...........but until it is publicly proven, you will defend Donnie.
 
#21,810
#21,810
The House Foreign Affairs committee is going to form a subcommittee to investigate Trump's efforts to block anyone from knowing the content of his conversations with Putin, including hiding the interpreter's notes.

And they may subpoena the translator.
 
#21,811
#21,811
lawgator1 said:
The House Foreign Affairs committee is going to form a subcommittee to investigate Trump's efforts to block anyone from knowing the content of his conversations with Putin, including hiding the interpreter's notes.

And they may subpoena the translator.
Click to expand...
Are private conversations between the Pres and other foreign leaders supposed to be everyone’s business?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#21,812
#21,812
luthervol said:
Which is why the investigation continues. You know that Trump knew about the meeting. You know he lied about it. You know he helped little donnie concoct a lie as cover...........but until it is publicly proven, you will defend Donnie.
Click to expand...
I know no such thing. I read that it "allegedly" occurred according to unnamed sources relating what an unknown investigator said Cohen told him/her.

You would like to believe it as true so you think you "know " it. I don't care if it is true or if it's false, until it's proven fact it's just noise that gets little dogs like you all hot and bothered. If it's proven true then Trump has to bear the consequences, whatever they may be, which as yet is undetermined, if any. Until then it amounts to nothing, except in your feverish mind..

YGHN.
 
#21,813
#21,813
lawgator1 said:
The House Foreign Affairs committee is going to form a subcommittee to investigate Trump's efforts to block anyone from knowing the content of his conversations with Putin, including hiding the interpreter's notes.

And they may subpoena the translator.
Click to expand...
Yeah, so? One act of Executive Privilege (like for Holder) and you get nothing.
 
#21,815
#21,815
lawgator1 said:
The House Foreign Affairs committee is going to form a subcommittee to investigate Trump's efforts to block anyone from knowing the content of his conversations with Putin, including hiding the interpreter's notes.

And they may subpoena the translator.
Click to expand...

Based on recent investigations everyone should just plead the 5th. They’ll ask the interpreter about the conversation and fabricate a charge tax evasion against him to get him to make up what they want to hear. A knew a guy that said if their asking questions then they don’t know anything, let them do the work.
 
#21,817
#21,817
Velo Vol said:
How would that even work? Would he issue a memo to the president which reads: "You're fired!"?
Click to expand...

He would present his evidence to congress and the DOJ.

One day you might want to pick up a civics book and put down the twitter.
 
#21,818
#21,818
lawgator1 said:
The House Foreign Affairs committee is going to form a subcommittee to investigate Trump's efforts to block anyone from knowing the content of his conversations with Putin, including hiding the interpreter's notes.
Click to expand...

Why? Where do they think that's going to go? If the FBI is investigating that, I'd leave it to them.
 
#21,820
#21,820
lawgator1 said:
The House Foreign Affairs committee is going to form a subcommittee to investigate Trump's efforts to block anyone from knowing the content of his conversations with Putin, including hiding the interpreter's notes.

And they may subpoena the translator.
Click to expand...

You never did answer the question about do you believe in teh separation of powers.

The house doesn't have a legal leg to stand on.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top