TrumPutinGate

Good thing Trump's got Giuliani.

Remember this? April, 2018

Giuliani joins Trump’s legal team, says he’ll quickly resolve Mueller’s probe

Rudy Giuliani said Thursday that he will join President Donald Trump’s legal team and hopes to bring an end to the special counsel’s investigation into Russian election meddling in “a week or two.”

“I’m going to join the legal team to try to bring this to a resolution,” Giuliani told The Post.
 
Where did I ever say Trump was guilty of anything more than being an habitual liar and despicable human? Please show me.....I want hold my breath.
I think Trump is guilty. I also think OJ was guilty.
For the third time I will ask?
What are your odds that Trump knew of the meeting? Lied about the meeting? Coached little donnie in his cover up lies? You have to have an opinion.
I've stated 20 times exactly what you are trying to advise me to do....see what evidence gets presented through a thorough investigation then go from there. Hell, that's what I've been saying all along.
Until then we have our opinions based on what we know.....my opinion....he is guilty. Your opinion?
I gave my opinion.

Until there is evidence proving something, I don't "know" and neither do you.

What evidence?


You know "evidence" luther, that pesky question, what evidence? That's what started this whole discourse between us. Now you are morphing that into what you "think". My opinion is this: Frankly, I don't give a damn what you think. What has been proven and what is he guilty of? That's where you have a big problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496 and DC_Vol
Where did I ever say Trump was guilty of anything more than being an habitual liar and despicable human? Please show me.....I want hold my breath.
I think Trump is guilty. I also think OJ was guilty.
For the third time I will ask?
What are your odds that Trump knew of the meeting? Lied about the meeting? Coached little donnie in his cover up lies? You have to have an opinion.
I've stated 20 times exactly what you are trying to advise me to do....see what evidence gets presented through a thorough investigation then go from there. Hell, that's what I've been saying all along.
Until then we have our opinions based on what we know.....my opinion....he is guilty. Your opinion?
I gave my opinion.

Until there is evidence proving something, I don't "know" and neither do you.

I know, right?
Just look at how reluctant redhatters are to accept the evidence as it comes out now. Do you think the 36% are going to accept anything but a thorough investigation. Mueller is having to build a case that is so solid that the radical right will not take up arms and go out and shoot up the rural countryside.


What evidence?


You know "evidence" luther, that pesky question, what evidence? That's what started this whole discourse between us. Now you are morphing that into what you "think". My opinion is this: Frankly, I don't give a damn what you think. What has been proven and what is he guilty of? That's where you have a big problem and can't answer. Instead you shuffle off the issue by asking for odds and changing from evidence, aka "proof", to what you think based on, at best, third hand accounts.

But that's your way, now isn't it?
 
Then there is this:

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s long-awaited report may not be as shocking as it has been built up to be - at least according to ABC News White House correspondent Jonathan Karl.

Speaking to host George Stephanopoulos Sunday on “This Week,” Karl said that he’s been told by sources close to the investigation that the report into Russian interference in the 2016 election and any possible collusion between President Trump's campaign and Moscow is “almost certain to be anti-climactic.”

"There have been expectations that have been building, of course, for over a year," Karl told Stephanopoulos. "But people who are closest to what Mueller has been doing, interacting with the special counsel, caution me that this report is almost certain to be anti-climactic."

[youtube]
 
I was pretty clear in my answer. Your "tells me volumes" comments are always good for a laugh. You're clueless.
Your (non)answers were clear; that's why I got a little chuckle. You don't have enough information in order to give your opinion on 3 simple questions, But you do have enough information to form the opinion that it is a deep state conspiracy. If you don't see the humor in that, I got nothing for you.
 
Your (non)answers were clear; that's why I got a little chuckle. You don't have enough information in order to give your opinion on 3 simple questions, But you do have enough information to form the opinion that it is a deep state conspiracy. If you don't see the humor in that, I got nothing for you.
It makes perfect sense. I know what I suspect and why I suspect it but refused to play your idiot game of idiots sliding scales. Doesn't change the fact that you claimed i refused to give an opinion and in the same sentence quoted my opinion.

Now with that pointed out, you just want to arm wave and distract with idiot games.

I genuinely hope your schtick is an act.
 
Then there is this:

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s long-awaited report may not be as shocking as it has been built up to be - at least according to ABC News White House correspondent Jonathan Karl.

Speaking to host George Stephanopoulos Sunday on “This Week,” Karl said that he’s been told by sources close to the investigation that the report into Russian interference in the 2016 election and any possible collusion between President Trump's campaign and Moscow is “almost certain to be anti-climactic.”

"There have been expectations that have been building, of course, for over a year," Karl told Stephanopoulos. "But people who are closest to what Mueller has been doing, interacting with the special counsel, caution me that this report is almost certain to be anti-climactic."

[youtube]

if this is true there are several people in this thread that may throw themselves off a cliff
 
I gave my opinion.

Until there is evidence proving something, I don't "know" and neither do you.







You know "evidence" luther, that pesky question, what evidence? That's what started this whole discourse between us. Now you are morphing that into what you "think". My opinion is this: Frankly, I don't give a damn what you think. What has been proven and what is he guilty of? That's where you have a big problem and can't answer. Instead you shuffle off the issue by asking for odds and changing from evidence, aka "proof", to what you think based on, at best, third hand accounts.

But that's your way, now isn't it?
My way is to take the information available and consider the possibilities and probabilities.
The evidence "in a nutshell" is that Trump is a liar. "No one in my campaign had ANY interactions or contacts with Russia." lol....turns out to be complete BS and an outright lie. I had no knowledge of the payments...lie. The meeting was about adoption....lie. I had no business dealings with Russia....lie. He is an habitual liar and the ongoing investigations point this out over and over.
There is irrefutable evidence - Trump lies about everything. Extrapolate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
It makes perfect sense. I know what I suspect and why I suspect it but refused to play your idiot game of idiots sliding scales. Doesn't change the fact that you claimed i refused to give an opinion and in the same sentence quoted my opinion.

Now with that pointed out, you just want to arm wave and distract with idiot games.

I genuinely hope your schtick is an act.
What a dope.
You did refuse to give an opinion about something simple and then turn right around and give another opinion about something far more complex. That was the whole point. SMDH
I didn't say you refused to give any opinions, just some while willingly to given others.
I genuinely hope you have greater comprehension and processing skills when reading other material.
 
My way is to take the information available and consider the possibilities and probabilities.
The evidence "in a nutshell" is that Trump is a liar. "No one in my campaign had ANY interactions or contacts with Russia." lol....turns out to be complete BS and an outright lie. I had no knowledge of the payments...lie. The meeting was about adoption....lie. I had no business dealings with Russia....lie. He is an habitual liar and the ongoing investigations point this out over and over.
There is irrefutable evidence - Trump lies about everything. Extrapolate.
YGHN. So what crime is he going to be indicted or impeached on based upon that "irrefutable evidence"?
 
Is that what Limbaugh is telling you? So far, Mueller been setting them up and knocking them down. Good thing Trump's got Giuliani.

Yeah he’s really bagged some big charges, Septic. Some small lies and charges against Russians who will likely never set foot in the US again (unless the Obama administration will let them back in for another setup).
 
What a dope.
You did refuse to give an opinion about something simple and then turn right around and give another opinion about something far more complex. That was the whole point. SMDH
I didn't say you refused to give any opinions, just some while willingly to given others.
I genuinely hope you have greater comprehension and processing skills when reading other material.
Don't waste your time, or for that matter, anyone else's by trying to refute petty arguments.
 
YGHN. So what crime is he going to be indicted or impeached on based upon that "irrefutable evidence"?
Who knows? Other than maybe Mueller. We just have to wait and see. Maybe there will be nothing impeachable, in which case we will just be stuck with a despicable human who is an habitual liar for a president.
 
What a dope.
You did refuse to give an opinion about something simple and then turn right around and give another opinion about something far more complex. That was the whole point. SMDH
I didn't say you refused to give any opinions, just some while willingly to given others.
I genuinely hope you have greater comprehension and processing skills when reading other material.


Actually, you asked me to very specifically rate very specific questions and I said that I don't have enough information to play that stupid game, but gave an opinion at a VERY general level.

Like I said, I hope your online schtick is an act.
 
Last edited:
Actually, you asked me to very specifically rate very specific questions and I said that I don't have enough information to play that stupid game, but gave an opinion at a VERY general level.

Like I said, I hope your online schtick is an act, else your keyboard is much more successful as a drool receptacle than typing cogent thoughts.
I understand your reluctance to state your current opinion based on the best information available, and why you would consider going on record with that opinion a "stupid game".
Taking Mick's advice, I'll leave it at that.
 
I understand your reluctance to state your current opinion based on the best information available, and why you would consider going on record with that opinion a "stupid game".
Taking Mick's advice, I'll leave it at that.

You literally make zero sense.
 
There’s a new action figure hitting shelves, and he doesn’t wear a cape or tights — his name is Robert Mueller.

The special counsel, who’s investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, is coming to life as a six-inch tall figure from a company called FCTRY.


The $20 mini of the famously tight-lipped Mueller — which is available for pre-order beginning Tuesday — comes with an array of strictly nonclassified features.

His “meticulous hair,” according to the product design maker, helps him “stay on message always,” while his “perma-sealed lips won’t sink ships.” He’s posed with an open hand “ready for the smoking gun,” and “impermeable shoes in case of tweetstorms.” The designer says the 74-year-old Mueller's extended finger “pokes holes in flimsy alibis,” and he sports a fixed gaze “because he knows you know he knows.”

muellerfigure.jpg


Mueller gets his own action figure
 
There’s a new action figure hitting shelves, and he doesn’t wear a cape or tights — his name is Robert Mueller.

The special counsel, who’s investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, is coming to life as a six-inch tall figure from a company called FCTRY.


The $20 mini of the famously tight-lipped Mueller — which is available for pre-order beginning Tuesday — comes with an array of strictly nonclassified features.

His “meticulous hair,” according to the product design maker, helps him “stay on message always,” while his “perma-sealed lips won’t sink ships.” He’s posed with an open hand “ready for the smoking gun,” and “impermeable shoes in case of tweetstorms.” The designer says the 74-year-old Mueller's extended finger “pokes holes in flimsy alibis,” and he sports a fixed gaze “because he knows you know he knows.”

muellerfigure.jpg


Mueller gets his own action figure

This is so appropriate for you.

Maybe you guys can put in a bulk order for a discount.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40

VN Store



Back
Top