Would you find it conspiracy nonsense and worth wasting time on if were an effort by a former CIA officer, and other CIA officers, admitting it was an effort to prevent Biden being elected, as the FBI - who had the laptop
since Dec. 2019 and knew the authenticity - influenced news and social media to portray it as 'Russian disinformation", knowing it was false and itself a disinfo campaign? And the whole thing driven by a senior Trump campaign official, Biden's counterpart A. Blinken?
I think you would.
You don't have to watch a Rogan episode; this link was already posted by someone:
'Russia Disinfo' Hoax About Hunter's Laptop Is Bigger Than Blinken
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last week, news
broke that a former top CIA official, Michael Morell, testified as part of a House Judiciary Committee investigation that Blinken, now-secretary of state and then-Biden campaign senior adviser, had contacted Morell to discuss the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story.
Blinken and Morell
reportedly “discussed possible Russian involvement in the spreading of information related to Hunter Biden.”
According to Morell, Blinken’s outreach “set in motion” what led to the public statement signed by 51 former intelligence agents that falsely framed the laptop as Russian disinformation.
Blinken forwarding an article claiming the FBI was investigating the laptop as a potential “disinformation campaign” is hugely significant because we know the FBI was doing
no such thing. The FBI knew both that the laptop was authentic and that John Paul Mac Isaac had possession of the hard drive, just as the New York Post had reported, albeit without identifying the computer-store owner by name.
The USA Today article nonetheless furthered the narrative that Morell and the other former intelligence officials would soon
parrot in their “Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails” — that the emails have “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Morell’s contact with Blinken reportedly went beyond the phone call and email. According to
CNN, following his conversation with Blinken, “Morell had conversations with other former intelligence community officials, which is what led to the letter,” and then Morell “circled back to the Biden campaign to let them know that the letter efforts were underway.”
In testimony to House oversight investigators, Morell told how Biden’s campaign helped strategize releasing the statement, according to a
letter Reps. Jim Jordan and Michael Turner sent to Blinken last week. Specifically, “Morell testified that he sent an email telling Nick Shapiro, former Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor to the Director of the CIA John Brennan, that the Biden campaign wanted the statement to go to a particular reporter at the
Washington Post first and that he should send the statement to the campaign when he sent the letter to the reporter.” Shapiro was another signatory of the statement.
Politico, however, eventually first broke the story and
published the statement, under the headline “Hunter Biden Story is Russian Disinfo, Dozens of Former Intel Officials Say.”
In his testimony to House investigators, Morell “explained that one of his two goals in releasing the statement was to help then-Vice President Biden in the debate and to assist him in winning the election,” Jordan and Turner wrote. In fact, according to attorney Mark Zaid, who represents several of the signatories, “when the draft [statement] was sent out to people to sign, the cover email made clear that it was an effort to help the Biden campaign.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an excerpt, and literally the scheme by the CIA/FBI to deny an incumbent a second presidential term.
Is it interesting yet, Huner? @TN Ribs