Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

You are exactly the type of viewer who Tucker Carlson appealed to.

You didn't want the truth. So, he didn't give it to you.

You only wanted your belief system to be affirmed. So, he lied to you ... and you loved him for it.

What belief system did Tucker Carlson subscribe to?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
Exclusive — Disarray Consumes Fox News as Murdochs Attempt to Reassert Control with Carlson, Bongino Ousters

Fox News is trying to sideline former Tucker Carlson Tonight host Tucker Carlson through the 2024 election, multiple sources familiar with the matter told Breitbart News.

Carlson’s current contract runs through December 2024, and as of now three sources familiar with the matter told Breitbart News that executives at the network are trying to keep Carlson on contract and not release him until after the 2024 election. The shocking decision to cancel Carlson’s top-rated weeknight program came just days after the network shut down its top-rated weekend program with host Dan Bongino. What follows here is an insider account from people actually in the know after Breitbart News spent the past several days interviewing key players in the personnel matters at Fox News, asking what really happened.

Two things are clear from speaking to people who actually know what’s happening on the inside: First, the official narrative from the network is untrue. Second, and perhaps more importantly, many of the leaks and speculation that have poured out in the past couple days since the bombshell news of Carlson’s show getting canceled was announced are also simply untrue.

They wiped out their biggest shows both on weekends and on weekdays to show the rest of the staff who’s the real boss, but in effect insiders say they have created a crisis that is quickly burgeoning out of control. In Succession, an aging media mogul, Logan Roy, navigates major business decisions for his sprawling empire while his children aggressively use whatever leverage they have to manipulate goings-on to advance their own positions. While Rupert Murdoch is said to hate the show, its plot is actually very close to what is happening in real life at Fox Corporation—Fox News’s parent company—as the adult children of Rupert Murdoch make moves in their bid to succeed their father.
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2...e-searched-by-eu-officials-in-competition.png

Exclusive — Disarray Consumes Fox News after Carlson, Bongino Ousters
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol
No.

Tucker Carlson was either reading Russian state-sponsored propaganda, or the latest crackpot conspiracy theory made up from scratch by one of the far-right kooks on 4chan.
How so? What is so unreasonable about being uneasy with how our Country has continuously escalated the conflict in Ukraine? I can be upset about our involvement in the Ukraine war because it’s contrary to the safety interests of our Country without being a supporter of Russia or Putin.
 
Are you gonna type that out another 100 times again tonight? And calling people names isn't a good luck for you either. You need to smoke a joint to relax & forget about Tucker awhile. Or go get your favorite "Playboy" & use that right hand some more.
I require 2 hands. One to hold the flashlight and the other to dig through the hair and find it.
 
It involved a fine ... which will always be mostly symbolic punishment. The point is, I never defended Hillary Clinton for the funding of the Steele Dossier. I was critical of it. That was a lie.
What are your thoughts about her having that server in her home? Do you think that was illegal? Unethical?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I find it interesting some people get so worked up over political commentators, yet pay zero attention to the fact the FBI paid Twitter $3.4 million to censor factual tweets. The GOVERNMENT paid Twitter to shut down free speech. It’s all in the Twitter files testimony in congress, but yeah, Tucker is the real threat. I largely suspect his next move is to storm the White House in a one man coup and remove Joe Biden later today.
Your last sentence excepted, that is exactly what he said in that little video. And he was spot on
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737
I never heard of Crowder and had to look him up last night. Still dont know his platform.
 
It appears to be conspiracy theorists nonsense to me. But I'll admit I haven't followed it very closely. It doesn't appear to be worth wasting time on.

Would you find it conspiracy nonsense and worth wasting time on if were an effort by a former CIA officer, and other CIA officers, admitting it was an effort to prevent Biden being elected, as the FBI - who had the laptop since Dec. 2019 and knew the authenticity - influenced news and social media to portray it as 'Russian disinformation", knowing it was false and itself a disinfo campaign? And the whole thing driven by a senior Trump campaign official, Biden's counterpart A. Blinken?
I think you would.

You don't have to watch a Rogan episode; this link was already posted by someone: 'Russia Disinfo' Hoax About Hunter's Laptop Is Bigger Than Blinken
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last week, news broke that a former top CIA official, Michael Morell, testified as part of a House Judiciary Committee investigation that Blinken, now-secretary of state and then-Biden campaign senior adviser, had contacted Morell to discuss the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story.

Blinken and Morell reportedly “discussed possible Russian involvement in the spreading of information related to Hunter Biden.” According to Morell, Blinken’s outreach “set in motion” what led to the public statement signed by 51 former intelligence agents that falsely framed the laptop as Russian disinformation.

Blinken forwarding an article claiming the FBI was investigating the laptop as a potential “disinformation campaign” is hugely significant because we know the FBI was doing no such thing. The FBI knew both that the laptop was authentic and that John Paul Mac Isaac had possession of the hard drive, just as the New York Post had reported, albeit without identifying the computer-store owner by name.

The USA Today article nonetheless furthered the narrative that Morell and the other former intelligence officials would soon parrot in their “Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails” — that the emails have “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

Morell’s contact with Blinken reportedly went beyond the phone call and email. According to CNN, following his conversation with Blinken, “Morell had conversations with other former intelligence community officials, which is what led to the letter,” and then Morell “circled back to the Biden campaign to let them know that the letter efforts were underway.”

In testimony to House oversight investigators, Morell told how Biden’s campaign helped strategize releasing the statement, according to a letter Reps. Jim Jordan and Michael Turner sent to Blinken last week. Specifically, “Morell testified that he sent an email telling Nick Shapiro, former Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor to the Director of the CIA John Brennan, that the Biden campaign wanted the statement to go to a particular reporter at the Washington Post first and that he should send the statement to the campaign when he sent the letter to the reporter.” Shapiro was another signatory of the statement.

Politico, however, eventually first broke the story and published the statement, under the headline “Hunter Biden Story is Russian Disinfo, Dozens of Former Intel Officials Say.”

In his testimony to House investigators, Morell “explained that one of his two goals in releasing the statement was to help then-Vice President Biden in the debate and to assist him in winning the election,” Jordan and Turner wrote. In fact, according to attorney Mark Zaid, who represents several of the signatories, “when the draft [statement] was sent out to people to sign, the cover email made clear that it was an effort to help the Biden campaign.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an excerpt, and literally the scheme by CIA officers/FBI to deny an incumbent a second presidential term.

Is it interesting yet, Huner? @TN Ribs
 
Last edited:
Then you'd also agree that Make America Great Again is not a white supremacist, anti-constitutional voting block comprising nearly 1/2 the country.
I define it more as "a longing for the old, white, conservative male dominated ways of the past". Comprising about 15%.
 
Would you find it conspiracy nonsense and worth wasting time on if were an effort by a former CIA officer, and other CIA officers, admitting it was an effort to prevent Biden being elected, as the FBI - who had the laptop since Dec. 2019 and knew the authenticity - influenced news and social media to portray it as 'Russian disinformation", knowing it was false and itself a disinfo campaign? And the whole thing driven by a senior Trump campaign official, Biden's counterpart A. Blinken?
I think you would.

You don't have to watch a Rogan episode; this link was already posted by someone: 'Russia Disinfo' Hoax About Hunter's Laptop Is Bigger Than Blinken
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last week, news broke that a former top CIA official, Michael Morell, testified as part of a House Judiciary Committee investigation that Blinken, now-secretary of state and then-Biden campaign senior adviser, had contacted Morell to discuss the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story.

Blinken and Morell reportedly “discussed possible Russian involvement in the spreading of information related to Hunter Biden.” According to Morell, Blinken’s outreach “set in motion” what led to the public statement signed by 51 former intelligence agents that falsely framed the laptop as Russian disinformation.

Blinken forwarding an article claiming the FBI was investigating the laptop as a potential “disinformation campaign” is hugely significant because we know the FBI was doing no such thing. The FBI knew both that the laptop was authentic and that John Paul Mac Isaac had possession of the hard drive, just as the New York Post had reported, albeit without identifying the computer-store owner by name.

The USA Today article nonetheless furthered the narrative that Morell and the other former intelligence officials would soon parrot in their “Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails” — that the emails have “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

Morell’s contact with Blinken reportedly went beyond the phone call and email. According to CNN, following his conversation with Blinken, “Morell had conversations with other former intelligence community officials, which is what led to the letter,” and then Morell “circled back to the Biden campaign to let them know that the letter efforts were underway.”

In testimony to House oversight investigators, Morell told how Biden’s campaign helped strategize releasing the statement, according to a letter Reps. Jim Jordan and Michael Turner sent to Blinken last week. Specifically, “Morell testified that he sent an email telling Nick Shapiro, former Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor to the Director of the CIA John Brennan, that the Biden campaign wanted the statement to go to a particular reporter at the Washington Post first and that he should send the statement to the campaign when he sent the letter to the reporter.” Shapiro was another signatory of the statement.

Politico, however, eventually first broke the story and published the statement, under the headline “Hunter Biden Story is Russian Disinfo, Dozens of Former Intel Officials Say.”

In his testimony to House investigators, Morell “explained that one of his two goals in releasing the statement was to help then-Vice President Biden in the debate and to assist him in winning the election,” Jordan and Turner wrote. In fact, according to attorney Mark Zaid, who represents several of the signatories, “when the draft [statement] was sent out to people to sign, the cover email made clear that it was an effort to help the Biden campaign.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an excerpt, and literally the scheme by the CIA/FBI to deny an incumbent a second presidential term.

Is it interesting yet, Huner? @TN Ribs

They frankly dont care. Why DC is such a sewer as they have them and the media in their pockets
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider

VN Store



Back
Top