lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,570
- Likes
- 42,840
eh, Im a bit dubious here. It was an interesting tale and well told. Its just hard to take on face value without some serious substantiation, something that is basically impossible to get.
I mean, we have Hunter providing laptops full of evidence and some people still believe that the Big Guy wasnt in on it. There is no way anyone could get sufficient evidence of Obama having gay trysts that would convince anyone. And if the evidence existed, any person linked to it would pretty much get a quick invite to go paddleboarding in Martha's Vinyard.
Why would anyone give a shat? Get a lifeeh, Im a bit dubious here. It was an interesting tale and well told. Its just hard to take on face value without some serious substantiation, something that is basically impossible to get.
I mean, we have Hunter providing laptops full of evidence and some people still believe that the Big Guy wasnt in on it. There is no way anyone could get sufficient evidence of Obama having gay trysts that would convince anyone. And if the evidence existed, any person linked to it would pretty much get a quick invite to go paddleboarding in Martha's Vinyard.
Dozens of politicians have been exposed in gay sex scandals. It's not impossible or even difficult at all for evidence to come out, when the "scandal" isn't complete horses**t
Why would anyone give a shat? Get a life
Anyone who likes him, and ever complains about media, is a moron.It's funny how Carlson when at Fox pretended to be a fan of Trump and to flirt with the conspiracy nonsense. But behind the scenes he was decrying it all.
Hey, anything to make a buck, right? Fake journalism. Just complete fraud.
And now he's embracing all of that even more! And the schmucks who listened him before have just fallen for all his crap all over again.