Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#1,801
#1,801
The unrelenting ignorance of the left. I decided to take a look at her twitter page to see what was being said since she mentioned people should pray about getting the vaccine.

It's not too surprising that because she retweeted Tucker Carlson that the dumbest of the lot is trying to convince her he is a white supremist, white nationalist, etc. These are people that are hard to reason with and are generally racist themselves. Even as a black woman she gets attacked by the left if she steps out of line. I think it's a wake up call.

https://mobile.twitter.com/nickiminaj
 
Last edited:
#1,802
#1,802
BreatheUT said:
The unrevolting ignorance of the left. I decided to take a look at her twitter page to see what was being said since she mentioned people should pray about getting the vaccine.

It's not too surprising that because she retweeted Tucker Carlson that the dumbest of the lot is trying to convince her he is a white supremist, white nationalist, etc. These are people that are hard to reason with and are generally racist themselves. Even as a black woman she gets attacked by the left if she steps out of line. I think it's a wake up call.

https://mobile.twitter.com/nickiminaj
Click to expand...
I'm thinking "unrevolting" wasn't what you meant to say there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#1,807
#1,807
Thursday, Sept. 23 Scoreboard: The Five Extends Total Viewers Winning Streak to Four Days

Tucker Carlson was Number One in the 25-54 demo, and second in total viewers
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#1,809
#1,809
n_huffhines said:
View attachment 397941
Click to expand...
What exactly is the point that Adam Bates and n_huffines, as the poster of this tweet are trying to make? The data is accurate. The graph is accurate. If idiots can't understand the graph, then they should be addressing their complaints to the socialists running the U.S. educational system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, BreatheUT and Franklin Pierce
#1,810
#1,810
Vol423 said:
What exactly is the point that Adam Bates and n_huffines, as the poster of this tweet trying to make? The data is accurate. The graph is accurate. If idiots can't understand the graph, then they should be addressing their complaints to the socialists running the U.S. educational system.
Click to expand...

The problem is there are some idiots watching Fox News and he's successfully tricking them. Your perception of public education does not absolve him.
 
Last edited:
#1,811
#1,811
n_huffhines said:
The problem is there are some idiots watching Fox News and he's successfully tricking them. Your perception of public education does not absolve him.
Click to expand...
Tricking them, how? The graph is accurate. Does he need to have a disclaimer underneath the graph to explain it to uneducated idiots that would try to claim that it is "tricking people"? Newsflash: The Y-Axis in that graph is clearly and properly labeled. The Y-Axis in a graph does NOT have to start at 0. It can start anywhere. They even clearly labeled the numbers on the data (which they didn't have to do) - 77% in 2009 and 65% in 2019.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and Franklin Pierce
#1,812
#1,812
Vol423 said:
Tricking them, how? The graph is accurate. Does he need to have a disclaimer underneath the graph to explain it to uneducated idiots that would try to claim that it is "tricking people"?
Click to expand...

The people pointing out the deception are not tricked by it, obviously.

The whole entire point of a visual graph is to help people digest the data that you're trying to communicate. The only time you would start a graph at any place other than 0 is if it somehow helps the viewer digest the information better. He's intentionally showing a visual aid that displays a much starker decline than what we're seeing. According to PEW, we saw a 16% decline in people claiming Christian beliefs. The non-numeric components of the visual are making it look like a 63% decline. There is no reason to do it this way unless you are trying to manipulate.
 
#1,813
#1,813
n_huffhines said:
The people pointing out the deception are not tricked by it, obviously.

The whole entire point of a visual graph is to help people digest the data that you're trying to communicate. The only time you would start a graph at any place other than 0 is if it somehow helps the viewer digest the information better. He's intentionally showing a visual aid that displays a much starker decline than what we're seeing. According to PEW, we saw a 16% decline in people claiming Christian beliefs. The non-numeric components of the visual are making it look like a 63% decline. There is no reason to do it this way unless you are trying to trick people.
Click to expand...
Apparently the answer to the rhetorical question I posed in my previous post is yes. He must post a disclaimer to explain a graph to the uneducated, liberal idiots.
 
#1,814
#1,814
Vol423 said:
Apparently the answer to the rhetorical question I posed in my previous post is yes. He must post a disclaimer to explain a graph to the uneducated, liberal idiots.
Click to expand...

He doesn't need to post a disclaimer, he needs to make a graph that indicates he successfully passed stats 101.
 
#1,815
#1,815
n_huffhines said:
He doesn't need to post a disclaimer, he needs to make a graph that indicates he successfully passed stats 101.
Click to expand...

Your parents should be seeking a refund for the tax dollars they paid toward your education. You obviously didn't actually receive one.
 
#1,816
#1,816
Vol423 said:
Your parents should be seeking a refund for the tax dollars they paid toward your education. You obviously didn't actually receive one.
Click to expand...

Home schooled by the most right-wing Mom you could possibly imagine.

Imagine you're a CEO and the VP of sales comes in with quarterly numbers that show an increase of 1.6% but the visual graphics made it look like a 6.3% increase. How much loss of trust would there be? You're probably dressing him down right there and saying stuff like "what do you think, that I'm stupid?"

That's what Tucker thinks about his viewers.
 
#1,817
#1,817
n_huffhines said:
That's what Tucker thinks about his viewers.
Click to expand...
Tucker thinks that his viewers are smart enough to accurately comprehend a graph that is completely and accurately labeled, including data labels on each of the columns clearly showing a drop from 77% in 2009 to 65% in 2019. Were he working for CNN, he would have known that he also needed to show an excerpt of "Reading and Accurately Understanding Graphs for Dummies". However, I'm sure he appreciates liberals like you tuning in to his show to further boost his ratings.
 
#1,819
#1,819
Vol423 said:
What exactly is the point that Adam Bates and n_huffines, as the poster of this tweet are trying to make? The data is accurate. The graph is accurate. If idiots can't understand the graph, then they should be addressing their complaints to the socialists running the U.S. educational system.
Click to expand...

Lol...yeah. It's not a y-axis. It's a bar graph.

I guess some think of it as a y-axis but the intent not to be a traditional x and y graph using negative and positive integers.
 
#1,821
#1,821
Vol423 said:
Tucker thinks that his viewers are smart enough to accurately comprehend a graph that is completely and accurately labeled, including data labels on each of the columns clearly showing a drop from 77% in 2009 to 65% in 2019. Were he working for CNN, he would have known that he also needed to show an excerpt of "Reading and Accurately Understanding Graphs for Dummies". However, I'm sure he appreciates liberals like you tuning in to his show to further boost his ratings.
Click to expand...

I promise you that he doesn't lump his whole audience into this segment. Only a buffoon would.
 
#1,824
#1,824
Vol423 said:
What exactly is the point that Adam Bates and n_huffines, as the poster of this tweet are trying to make? The data is accurate. The graph is accurate. If idiots can't understand the graph, then they should be addressing their complaints to the socialists running the U.S. educational system.
Click to expand...
The graph is scaled to make it look worse than it actually is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top