Volfan2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 34,588
- Likes
- 64,283
Congratulations on your google skills. Nicely done. UConn, UK, U of L, T A&M, NC State, MTSU, ISU and many others know being a good coach is not gender based.Two male coaches were in the final game last year. I do have a brain and I use it to think and observe. I also watch a lot of women's BB. I stand by what I said.Women's National Champs other than UCONN:
2012 Baylor- Kim Mulkey
***2011 Texas A&M- Gary Blair
2007-2008- Tenn
2006 Maryland- Brenda Freese
2001- Notre Dame- Muffett McGraw
1999- Purdue- Carolyn Peck
1994- North Carolina-Slyvia Hatchell
1993- Texas Tech=Marsha Sharp
1992- Stanford-Tara VanDerveer
* SO LET ME SEE- other than UCONN and 1 Texas A&M male coach, a woman has led her team to the title ever since 1992. You might want to grow a brain before you comment-ORANGE MANIAC.
Doesn't mean he will even be 1/4 of what his mother was. If UT decides to move on from Holly Warlick in the future, then they should be able to land a much better coach than Tyler. Not trying the bash the guy but give him some more time to prove himself before you take that step.
Incest is best.
Two points:
1. We will no longer be the per-eminent university for womens basketball come April.
2. Pat Summit deserves every accolade and word of praise that comes her way. But just because she brought program up from nothing to where is today does not mean she can dictate moves around the program until her dying day. The program belongs to the University of Tennessee--not Pat Summit.
Universities that allow that type of dictatorial control and worship usually get in trouble. How well did that work out for Penn State?
So Dooley would've been a good coach if Georgia had hired him?Hear this and hear it now: Tyler is the offspring of the lady who is the primary reason that NCAA women's basketball is what it is today. She singlehandedly put Lady Vol basketball on the map and established us as the preeminent university for the sport. SHE earned the right for her son to coach on the court named after her.
He need only put in the requisite time to ensure that he has an understanding of how major college women's basketball programs function. He is rapidly approaching that threshold given his ongoing position.
AV
PS. The Dooley fiasco is not even applicable, as we are not GA. His coaching birthright was earned, and should have stayed, well south of the TN border.
Hmmmm.. I do play the banjohmy:
Congratulations on your google skills. Nicely done. UConn, UK, U of L, T A&M, NC State, MTSU, ISU and many others know being a good coach is not gender based.Two male coaches were in the final game last year. I do have a brain and I use it to think and observe. I also watch a lot of women's BB. I stand by what I said.
Hear this and hear it now: Tyler is the offspring of the lady who is the primary reason that NCAA women's basketball is what it is today. She singlehandedly put Lady Vol basketball on the map and established us as the preeminent university for the sport. SHE earned the right for her son to coach on the court named after her.
He need only put in the requisite time to ensure that he has an understanding of how major college women's basketball programs function. He is rapidly approaching that threshold given his ongoing position.
AV
PS. The Dooley fiasco is not even applicable, as we are not GA. His coaching birthright was earned, and should have stayed, well south of the TN border.
We are not far apart on this. I prefer a woman to coach a women's team myself, but I don't think women or men get more out of their players. That's all I have had an issue with. I think it has more to do with each coaches personality and knowing which buttons to push for each player. That was what made Pat so good.Good points. You might be right. I guess I am coming from a parent of a daughter and might be using my personal bias towards wanting my daughter to be coached by a female vs male. I think female coaches provide a wonderful example of how far a female can climb the ladder in society versus handing someone a job just based on a last name.
Pat has instilled "winning" into him. I think that's more than Holly has done. The Lady Vols haven't had the toughness instilled into them like Pat did.