jskizzle812
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 165
- Likes
- 1
Driskel wasn't going to start
Negateer said:Driskell was the better of the two. Just watch the Auburn game from last year.
hands down.
Brissett will be our starting QB, as he was running slightly ahead of Driskel before the injury.
Again, Brissett was distancing himself from Driskel before the injury. The silver lining is Brissett will now get 100% of the reps in practice.
Ding or no ding, if the season started today Brissett would be the starter.
Question is now if Driskel throws an INT or makes a bunch of bad throws in the Texas A&M game does Champ put Brissett in?
I think Muschump naming Driskel the "Starter" is literal. He will literally take the first snap of the game. I would guess we will still see both QB's playing Saturday at some point.
Wrong, as I said.
But you kept doubling down...
lol nope
Again, you're wrong. And I was right.
When are you gonna come around and take yer crow for being such a homer and not listening to your betters?
lol
I wondered why you haven't been around here. Typical drive by troll.
Wrong, as I said.
But you kept doubling down...
lol nope
Again, you're wrong. And I was right.
When are you gonna come around and take yer crow for being such a homer and not listening to your betters?
lol
I wondered why you haven't been around here. Typical drive by troll.
Question is now if Driskel throws an INT or makes a bunch of bad throws in the Texas A&M game does Chump put Brissett in?
You're wrong a lot, so I could see why this is such a big deal for you.
Again, not everybody is a troll. You're annoying.
I have Negateer on ignore, but I wouldn't be surprised if he's responding to my posts about Brissett being ahead of Driskel prior to Driskel's injury.
Ya, he pretty much owned you.