bowlinggreenvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
- Messages
- 10,123
- Likes
- 3,912
I did not say myself nor did I say this thread. I said OTHERS have called you out for it in OTHER threads, myself included, in OTHER threads at OTHER times.
I have no use for people who live off of stats and computer algorithms and display a complete lack of knowledge and common sense understanding for the game itself.
The SEC is so pathetically, unpredictable this year. Other than everyone can win at home, thats the only constant. We blow y'all out and lose to Mizzou then we see what happens tonight. Outside of UF, away wins are hard to come by and even they've been tested lately.
What does the understanding of the game have to do with deciding who's in and out of the tournament?
That's not how it's decided, surely you realize that no? The committee isn't made up of a bunch of former high level players and coaches, you know that right?
And most of what they use is computer number and algorithms.
Yes BTO I understand the committee is made up of AD's and Commissioners. That's on less thing you need to educate me on. I say have no use for you because you present yourself as the guru of basketball in here yet you seem to lack an understanding of basic principles. My dislike for you has nothing to do with how the tourney field is selected.
In this discussion my understanding of the numbers and algorithms is much more important than that of X's and O's.
I'm sorry if you don't like that, but it's the truth.
I know this is a vol's board, but since you have a good handle on rpis and the ncaa tourney let me ask you this.. UGA has 4 bad losses.. if UGA finds a way to win out (not saying they will, but using that as a what if) other than winning the sec tourney can we get into the ncaa tourney with just 2 wins in the sec tourney? we would have an rpi of about 63 to 64 if we win out heading into the sec tourney.. thanks .
IMO no. But I'd love to see the butt sniffers in Georgia get a few more years of that coach with the game presence of a home-economics teach.
Well for one, it's a discussion board. So what you're calling "attacking" I see as rebuttal. I mean if someone posts something he thinks is false, you would rather him just ignore it?
Second, like I said, it takes more than one and it appears one other in particular seems to be rather eager to tango with him. So I'm not sure why he's not called out for the same thing, other than BTO has been labeled a Martin apologist.
I know this is a vol's board, but since you have a good handle on rpis and the ncaa tourney let me ask you this.. UGA has 4 bad losses.. if UGA finds a way to win out (not saying they will, but using that as a what if) other than winning the sec tourney can we get into the ncaa tourney with just 2 wins in the sec tourney? we would have an rpi of about 63 to 64 if we win out heading into the sec tourney.. thanks .
Who knows?
I know the sec schedules are not balanced, but if mizzou is still considered in (as an example), it's a joke.
You can not lose to bama, be swept by Georgia, finish 3 games behind Georgia in the sec standings and get a bid.
I guess I'm too old school, but conference standings matter to me.
I value the overall body of work, sure. But, you don't get in (IMO) because of 1 win that occurred 3 months ago. That doesn't fly with me.
I know if I am a committee member, beating virginia is great. in mizzou's case beating Ucla is great. But, it doesn't nullify being so very mediocre in a very mediocre league.