BJWeeks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Messages
- 6,729
- Likes
- 6,552
Legit question for you. Since Heupel has been here, how many years would you say our CBs have been good? Please answer truthfully and be objective.
In 2021 the CBs were not good.āGoodā is a subjective term. Iāll say the following, honestly and objectively:
1) I think Tennessee has had at least one good CB 3 of the 4 years, but this is the first year they were all good. Iām counting the Nickel position since thatās WMās responsibility. Taylor and Jackson were good in 2021, but the other spot was weak. In 2022, we werenāt good at any spot. Charles was out of position playing CB, Hadden hadnāt come along yet, and both battled injuries. McDonald was meh at Nickel. In 2023, Hadden developed and was good, but we lost him halfway through the season to injury. McDonald was still meh at NB. GJL made the NFL, but he was closer to average. We got his max ability, which is limited by lack of speed. In 2024, we had a good player at all 3 spots (Gibson, McCoy, and Boo/Harrison). Even McMurray was a solid CB off the bench.
So Iād say it looked like this in terms of how many of those spots were āgoodā:
21: 2 of 3
22: 0 of 3
23: 1 of 3, until Hadden got hurt.
23: 3 of 3
So the worst year, by far, was 22. The best was this year. Itās funny to me that so many of our fans are complaining about WM when his most recent performance is a good one. Itās like keeping a coach while he builds, then firing him after heās got it built.
2) Many of our fans have no idea what good coverage looks like or who is responsible for what. They just see completed passes and blame Willie. Our safeties and LBs have been more responsible for pass defense liability than have CBs, especially this year. I question Banks as a Safety Coach much more than I question Willie as a CB Coach.
3) Scheme also plays a role. But if you want to see a real answer to your question, look at the confidence Banks has had in the CBs by looking at how aggressively he deploys them. He has no problem putting Gibson and McCoy in press man. He did that last year before Hadden got hurt, but was hesitant to do so with GJL. He didnāt do it at all in 22. Thatās telling. He knew what he had and didnāt have.
You asked me for an honest and objective assessment. I took the time to give you that. You clearly weren't honest in asking me for that, nor are you interested in a nuanced discussion.In 2021 the CBs were not good.
In 2022 the CBs were not good.
In 2023 the CBs were not good.
In 2024 the CBs were good.
If you would like to argue these points letās go. The bottom line is most of us on this board have said the secondary has been our main weakness on defense ever since Heupel got here. Finally this past year they looked good. So 1 out of 4 years Martinez group has looked good. He should have been fired before this season. I know you donāt think so but Heupel had chances to upgrade and he didnāt.
Sure thing bud. All I did was post facts. Thatās all I wanted from you. If you posted a bunch in defense of WM. I get it. You like him and think because of this past years success, his failures are forgiven. I donāt know how you can say a coach is good when he only has one good year out of 4. But you do you.You asked me for an honest and objective assessment. I took the time to give you that. You clearly weren't honest in asking me for that, nor are you interested in a nuanced discussion.
I have it on good authority that any completed pass is Martinezās fault. Also any pass completed is bc the CB didnāt get their head around; thatās even been said when a LBer was in coverage.āGoodā is a subjective term. Iāll say the following, honestly and objectively:
1) I think Tennessee has had at least one good CB 3 of the 4 years, but this is the first year they were all good. Iām counting the Nickel position since thatās WMās responsibility. Taylor and Jackson were good in 2021, but the other spot was weak. In 2022, we werenāt good at any spot. Charles was out of position playing CB, Hadden hadnāt come along yet, and both battled injuries. McDonald was meh at Nickel. In 2023, Hadden developed and was good, but we lost him halfway through the season to injury. McDonald was still meh at NB. GJL made the NFL, but he was closer to average. We got his max ability, which is limited by lack of speed. In 2024, we had a good player at all 3 spots (Gibson, McCoy, and Boo/Harrison). Even McMurray was a solid CB off the bench.
So Iād say it looked like this in terms of how many of those spots were āgoodā:
21: 2 of 3
22: 0 of 3
23: 1 of 3, until Hadden got hurt.
23: 3 of 3
So the worst year, by far, was 22. The best was this year. Itās funny to me that so many of our fans are complaining about WM when his most recent performance is a good one. Itās like keeping a coach while he builds, then firing him after heās got it built.
2) Many of our fans have no idea what good coverage looks like or who is responsible for what. They just see completed passes and blame Willie. Our safeties and LBs have been more responsible for pass defense liability than have CBs, especially this year. I question Banks as a Safety Coach much more than I question Willie as a CB Coach.
3) Scheme also plays a role. But if you want to see a real answer to your question, look at the confidence Banks has had in the CBs by looking at how aggressively he deploys them. He has no problem putting Gibson and McCoy in press man. He did that last year before Hadden got hurt, but was hesitant to do so with GJL. He didnāt do it at all in 22. Thatās telling. He knew what he had and didnāt have.
In 2021 the CBs were not good.
In 2022 the CBs were not good.
In 2023 the CBs were not good.
In 2024 the CBs were good.
If you would like to argue these points letās go. The bottom line is most of us on this board have said the secondary has been our main weakness on defense ever since Heupel got here. Finally this past year they looked good. So 1 out of 4 years Martinez group has looked good. He should have been fired before this season. I know you donāt think so but Heupel had chances to upgrade and he didnāt.
In 2021 the CBs were not good.
In 2022 the CBs were not good.
In 2023 the CBs were not good.
In 2024 the CBs were good.
If you would like to argue these points letās go. The bottom line is most of us on this board have said the secondary has been our main weakness on defense ever since Heupel got here. Finally this past year they looked good. So 1 out of 4 years Martinez group has looked good. He should have been fired before this season. I know you donāt think so but Heupel had chances to upgrade and he didnāt.
what facts did you post? you posted 100% opinion with no backup. What facts do you have to back up that 21-23 all our corners were bad? I think its kinda nuts seeing how many secondary players from those teams are actually in the NFL and playing right now. See that's a fact.. there are players from those teams that not only made rosters but are playing in the NFL. So saying they were not good is kinda weird....someone good enough for the NFL is not good enough for UT?Sure thing bud. All I did was post facts. Thatās all I wanted from you. If you posted a bunch in defense of WM. I get it. You like him and think because of this past years success, his failures are forgiven. I donāt know how you can say a coach is good when he only has one good year out of 4. But you do you.
So Iād say it looked like this in terms of how many of those spots were āgoodā:āGoodā is a subjective term. Iāll say the following, honestly and objectively:
1) I think Tennessee has had at least one good CB 3 of the 4 years, but this is the first year they were all good. Iām counting the Nickel position since thatās WMās responsibility. Taylor and Jackson were good in 2021, but the other spot was weak. In 2022, we werenāt good at any spot. Charles was out of position playing CB, Hadden hadnāt come along yet, and both battled injuries. McDonald was meh at Nickel. In 2023, Hadden developed and was good, but we lost him halfway through the season to injury. McDonald was still meh at NB. GJL made the NFL, but he was closer to average. We got his max ability, which is limited by lack of speed. In 2024, we had a good player at all 3 spots (Gibson, McCoy, and Boo/Harrison). Even McMurray was a solid CB off the bench.
So Iād say it looked like this in terms of how many of those spots were āgoodā:
21: 2 of 3
22: 0 of 3
23: 1 of 3, until Hadden got hurt.
23: 3 of 3
So the worst year, by far, was 22. The best was this year. Itās funny to me that so many of our fans are complaining about WM when his most recent performance is a good one. Itās like keeping a coach while he builds, then firing him after heās got it built.
2) Many of our fans have no idea what good coverage looks like or who is responsible for what. They just see completed passes and blame Willie. Our safeties and LBs have been more responsible for pass defense liability than have CBs, especially this year. I question Banks as a Safety Coach much more than I question Willie as a CB Coach.
3) Scheme also plays a role. But if you want to see a real answer to your question, look at the confidence Banks has had in the CBs by looking at how aggressively he deploys them. He has no problem putting Gibson and McCoy in press man. He did that last year before Hadden got hurt, but was hesitant to do so with GJL. He didnāt do it at all in 22. Thatās telling. He knew what he had and didnāt have.
We have TEs that can be possession receivers. If this year showed us anything, it's that we need speed and guys who can take the top off a defense. Nothing against Bru, but he wasn't anything special. Decent possession receiver who was a solid blocker at the position.Wonder if they plan on bulking someone up to handle what Bru did?