It does not and will not level the playing field. Do you think say miss st nil can spend like Texas, or Oregon. There is as far as I know, no cap. Think about how is ever going to be level. Just like the Yankees of old, they won every year because they had the most money and could pay players to sit on their bench, just so other teams couldnβt have them. Levels the playing field my asscollege football has always been pay for play. NIL just levels the playing field
Your average journalist would wait until he had some details before running with a story .... Forde freely admits that he didn't have any, but ran with it anyway. Would he have done the same if it involved Louisville? Look at how precious little Forde reported on the Pitino scandals and get back to me on that.Didn't forde write an article about the ncaa's decision on UT raising hell about how Tennessee got off easy.
What is this?
if Miss St actually wanted to be a serious program they most certainly could. maybe i should clarify--it levels the playing field for programs that want to be serious about football.It does not and will not level the playing field. Do you think say miss st nil can spend like Texas, or Oregon. There is as far as I know, no cap. Think about how is ever going to be level. Just like the Yankees of old, they won every year because they had the most money and could pay players to sit on their bench, just so other teams couldnβt have them. Levels the playing field my ass
The only thing schools are allowed to do (wink, wink) is show a prospect athlete what someone on the team makes at their position.
You are correct states have passed laws allowing HS athletes to make money (thatβs a slippery slope of HS kids being bought to play across town) but any kid that does so, is in violation of NCAA laws. Legal by HS measure, illegal by NCAA measure. (Try to make sense of that). However, 9 State AGs currently have a lawsuit against NCAA for this matter, interested to see how it plays out.