Snakes on a Wii
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2009
- Messages
- 776
- Likes
- 0
I've been getting into a back and forth after the UT faculty senate unanimously upheld a ban on concealed carry on campus at UT. Originally I wrote in to express disappointment with the decision (despite being mostly a liberal myself I am definitely "pro-gun"):
Your View: Upheld firearm policy raises constitutional issues | The Daily Beacon
That prompted a response from an English lecturer, who seemed to have missed the "concealed" in "concealed carry" and went on to warn of "seeing people toting guns everywhere":
Your View: Gun controversy creates conflicting views | The Daily Beacon
Against my better judgment I responded again. This time I (perhaps naively) assumed that reasonable people could come to an agreement based on the evidence. So I cited evidence this time:
Your View: Reader ignores firearm safety statistics | The Daily Beacon
Now here's where it gets interesting, and there's a life lesson for everyone out there, no matter what your political ideology. It doesn't matter how many degrees you have, or how well-educated you are. We are all human beings subject to our own biases, and if you want to believe something strongly enough, you can manage it in spite of reasonable arguments to the contrary. I just finished reading a response from a different professor. If you examine it closely you will find evidence that she did not even read my arguments that carefully, because while I clearly stated "In 2007, there were...", she insisted that I "did not specify over what span of time".
Your View: Trained law enforcement safer than armed students, faculty | The Daily Beacon
I don't mean to come off as anti-intellectual. I'm somewhat of an intellectual-minded person myself. But seeing as this forum is typically full of fairly conservative people I thought you would all get a big kick out of seeing some of y'alls perceptions about liberal academians validated.
Your View: Upheld firearm policy raises constitutional issues | The Daily Beacon
That prompted a response from an English lecturer, who seemed to have missed the "concealed" in "concealed carry" and went on to warn of "seeing people toting guns everywhere":
Your View: Gun controversy creates conflicting views | The Daily Beacon
Against my better judgment I responded again. This time I (perhaps naively) assumed that reasonable people could come to an agreement based on the evidence. So I cited evidence this time:
Your View: Reader ignores firearm safety statistics | The Daily Beacon
Now here's where it gets interesting, and there's a life lesson for everyone out there, no matter what your political ideology. It doesn't matter how many degrees you have, or how well-educated you are. We are all human beings subject to our own biases, and if you want to believe something strongly enough, you can manage it in spite of reasonable arguments to the contrary. I just finished reading a response from a different professor. If you examine it closely you will find evidence that she did not even read my arguments that carefully, because while I clearly stated "In 2007, there were...", she insisted that I "did not specify over what span of time".
Your View: Trained law enforcement safer than armed students, faculty | The Daily Beacon
I don't mean to come off as anti-intellectual. I'm somewhat of an intellectual-minded person myself. But seeing as this forum is typically full of fairly conservative people I thought you would all get a big kick out of seeing some of y'alls perceptions about liberal academians validated.