BruisedOrange
Well... known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 6,679
- Likes
- 17,161
It baffles me too, but people see what they want to see. I think people would be surprised if they compared Vescovi's stats to the other guards. He isn't the weakest link statistically.He handles the ball more than anyone and he doesn't even lead the team in turnovers. He has a nearly 2:1 assist/turnover ratio, is our most consistent volume 3 point shooter, is second on the team in steals, and is one of our better rebounding guards. To single Santi out for being a liability is baffling.
Uros is apparently just not a BB player at this level, if he is at any level. I mean if your 7 ft tall and cannot get any minuets on this team right now with the weak inside play then he is not going to get any. Barnes needs to be mining the portal to find inside help for next season.
SV is painful to watch. Bad with turnovers and controlling the overall pace of the game. Big reason why we don't score in transition. Picks up dribbles, 1000 dribbles to go 10 feet and is awful driving the ball. Hes a much better 2 . I would rather see KJ, VB, JJJ, JS run point. SV is a liability. Mizzou guards had a career day vs him. Its a guard game and it will show in March, for those homers watching SV.
Are you kidding? KJ turns the ball over more than Santi. KJ needs to play the 3. Not the 1.SV is painful to watch. Bad with turnovers and controlling the overall pace of the game. Big reason why we don't score in transition. Picks up dribbles, 1000 dribbles to go 10 feet and is awful driving the ball. Hes a much better 2 . I would rather see KJ, VB, JJJ, JS run point. SV is a liability. Mizzou guards had a career day vs him. Its a guard game and it will show in March, for those homers watching SV.
Are you kidding? KJ turns the ball over more than Santi. KJ needs to play the 3. Not the 1.
Lol, directly after multiple posts that display actual stats proving he does not turn the ball over that much and we post "bad with turnovers." Now, pace of the game, yes, he is not able from the PG position to get us playing at a fast pace. That is true.SV is painful to watch. Bad with turnovers and controlling the overall pace of the game. Big reason why we don't score in transition. Picks up dribbles, 1000 dribbles to go 10 feet and is awful driving the ball. Hes a much better 2 . I would rather see KJ, VB, JJJ, JS run point. SV is a liability. Mizzou guards had a career day vs him. Its a guard game and it will show in March, for those homers watching SV.
He has a hip pointer, Fulkerson has lost weight and is getting pushed and others are also trying to recover form injuries. They will play better when they heal.Vescovi is not playing good but neither is anyone else. I thought pons played well but he is so inconsistent too. Vescovi should not be running the point. How is it we don’t have a point guard? Bone has been gone for what two years? Vescovi has no drive and often gets himself in trouble when going to the hoop. Some games he hits threes others he’s cold. Same as the rest of the team.
Fulkerson has been very inconsistent and a non threat lately. Like what is going on. He never seems to go in and battle in the paint.
yes when he is in top shape, never wants to come out or gets tired - was easy to tell he was playing in painlay off SV; it was obvious he was in pain and is helluva compeitor
hope he's here for 2 more years, plus wel see a dynamite PG next november and possibly one of the nation's best backcourt
nobody was doing much slow Pinson on urday
Long way to go! Vescovi is not a point guard though. Struggles with his ball handling, especially trying to dribble to his right; therefore, takes deep in shot clock by the time he gets us in offense. Every basket is a struggle. He cannot guard any point guards in this league. Not quick and tough enough. That said, he is our best three point shooterYeah, he, like Fulkerson,
is playing through nagging injuries. Everyone needs to relax. Lots of games left on the schedule