m1al
I'm the most wanted man on my island...
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 15,615
- Likes
- 27,922
I am guessing he is saying it is deceiving because the opposing offence can still have a high number of first downs or scores because your not stopping them and making it to third down often. It would make sense that you need to take the total number of first downs into account when looking at that stat.....
Please understand I am in no way saying this is the case for us. Haven't really even payed close enough attention to the numbers. I am only commenting on why he called it a deceiving stat.
Let's put a little more significance to this. This Vol defense has only allowed the three teams it has played to convert a third down into a first down 10 out of 43 attempts. PS A little side note. Keith Ford, the guy who killed the Vols inthe Oklahoma game is out with an injury for the West Virginia game.Tennessee is tied with Virginia Tech at 3rd place in FBS in 3rd down conversion defense. Oklahoma only converted 3 of 12 third downs against the Vols! Our defense is only allowing 23.3% of third downs to become first downs. Oklahoma did not have a sustained drive rushing the football against our defense.
Does Pearson stay? If Pig shows out (who knows) will he stay?
Remember we have P. Williams coming in next year too.
They also only had 3 more 1st downs than we did and our offense was better on third down by 10% with more third down attempts.
Actually, the more you dissect the stats.....there is a lot of good for them to take from this game over the next two weeks.
A lot of bad too, but I'm a glass half full kind of guy I guess.
I could agree with this except......They were 3 for 12 on third down. 3 for 13 if you count the failed 4th down attempt.
Does Pearson stay? If Pig shows out (who knows) will he stay?
Remember we have P. Williams coming in next year too.