evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,087
1. so the purchasing power parity is a really interesting way to look at things, it first assumes that the two nations currencies are equal on the world market. and then it sees how much those same currency rates will buy in their own country. while ignoring taxes (import, export, and sales), and local pricing differences on goods. the more I look at it the less I understand what it is actually telling anyone. seems like a real good case of lies, damn lies, and statistics.
"That is, PPP is the exchange rate at which one nation's currency would be converted into another to purchase the same and same amounts of a large group of products"What Is Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), and How Is It Calculated?
Purchasing power parity (PPP) compares economic growth and standards of living in different countries with a common currency/basket of goods approach.www.investopedia.com
2. oil and gas, the G7 has NEVER been a key figure in the O&G production side of things.
3. the food metric is again a case of lying through statistics. China, India, and Russia are NET food IMPORTERS. Note India is technically a net exporter because of the beef they don't eat, but do export. So if trade shut down they would have to start eating their sacred cows to stay alive.
"The end result of these processes is that five countries (China, Korea, Japan, Russia and Saudi Arabia) are responsible for about 40% of food net imports and seven countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, New Zealand, Thailand and USA) account for about 55% of total food net exports"
Food Exports and Imports Worldwide | IndexMundi Blog
www.indexmundi.com
4. geography is geography and whats kinda funny is the trade routes they mention generally only matter to the developed nations, or at least matter more. in a non-western centered trade economy those trade routes aren't nearly as useful/important.
5. cool they have goals
6. geography...all those routes are land routes, remember what I said about #4?
7. China playing the victim card right after they publish a map claiming land from 3 other BRICS members. Imperialism isn't going anywhere.
Hey, genius... what do tractors run on? How about fertilizer? How will you get food from the farm, to the processing plants to the grocery stores?This seems ripe for a game changer ... or two can play this game. FPEC (or F-OPEC); they have an oil cartel, so create a food cartel. You want to hold back oil, no problem, but see if you can eat oil.
We can just skip to #5 to see why this is a lot of hot air. They can't agree on a currency. They only existing one that could serve as a trade currency is China's. And (presumably) other countries see how easily China could manipulate that to favor its trade. So that hasn't happened.
Moreover, do these countries fundamentally have much in common? India and China? Can China provide the Middle East with security guarantees the way the U.S. has? That's what countries like Saudi Arabia want. Argentina? What does it bring to the table?
Hey, genius... what do tractors run on? How about fertilizer? How will you get food from the farm, to the processing plants to the grocery stores?
Hey @Rasputin_Vol, can you let your lads know that's not what we mean when we say "use a rubber for protection"?
are those oil producing countries going fully robotic, because their workers more than likely still need food to get/refine/distribute that oil in the first place.Hey, genius... what do tractors run on? How about fertilizer? How will you get food from the farm, to the processing plants to the grocery stores?
Which becomes apparent when you drill down beyond the rhetoric and examine what binding agreements they have actually constructed.China and India have been skirmishing for years - makes little sense for them to be part of an alliance now. If S America were flipped, we'd probably be seeing Brazilians instead of C Americans swarming across the border. Saudis are thugs with oil. There's not an untroubled country in BRICS. Each of the five counties that BRICS stands for has an almost national religion - none are the same. Basically none of the five have much in common except a chip on it's shoulder - not a marriage made in heaven. At least three have a population problem and extremes of unequal wealth - some extremely rich and large numbers in extreme poverty.
Or is Ras-speak, "not a big deal"
Actually you were chest thumping about orc prowess in the I-95 bridge collapse and had to eat crow when it was back and carrying traffic two weeks later MoeIt really wasn't a big deal...
Russia repairs span on Crimean bridge that collapsed after drone attack
The Russian occupying authorities have replaced a span on the Crimean bridge which had collapsed after an attack by uncrewed surface vessels (USVs) during a special operation by the Ukrainian Navy and security services.news.yahoo.com
Now the thing that should pizz every American off right now is how quickly the Russians have been able to repair this bridge after 2 attacks while in America, we take years to fix a pothole.
You're so cute love. Any morsel of slightly positive news for Russia (possible repair of Kerch bridge; Russia taking out a challenger tank) is trumpeted like it's the best borscht ever.It really wasn't a big deal...
Russia repairs span on Crimean bridge that collapsed after drone attack
The Russian occupying authorities have replaced a span on the Crimean bridge which had collapsed after an attack by uncrewed surface vessels (USVs) during a special operation by the Ukrainian Navy and security services.news.yahoo.com
Now the thing that should pizz every American off right now is how quickly the Russians have been able to repair this bridge after 2 attacks while in America, we take years to fix a pothole.
It really wasn't a big deal...
Russia repairs span on Crimean bridge that collapsed after drone attack
The Russian occupying authorities have replaced a span on the Crimean bridge which had collapsed after an attack by uncrewed surface vessels (USVs) during a special operation by the Ukrainian Navy and security services.news.yahoo.com
Now the thing that should pizz every American off right now is how quickly the Russians have been able to repair this bridge after 2 attacks while in America, we take years to fix a pothole.
Unless you have some good saboteurs.Even N Vietnam repaired damage to the Paul Doumer Bridge time after time until the AF was finally able to leave it like this. Bridges have been notoriously difficult to destroy partly because important ones are generally heavily defended, and they aren't easy to bring down. What finally did in the Doumer Bridge was 2000lb laser guided bombs - the first application of their kind. To permanently destroy a bridge means taking out the supports - not spans that can be replaced, and that's not easily done against a heavily defended bridge.