BeardedVol
Not-Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2012
- Messages
- 14,701
- Likes
- 28,174
Let me give you the history... In 2014, there was a coup in Kiev and an Anti- Russian Pro-Western government was installed. The republics in Eastern Ukraine rejected the new government, which resulted in a civil war. Russia tried to settle things with diplomacy, but the West wanted this war. That's why they keep escalating and are now supplying missiles to launch them inside Russia.Not sure which is the dumber statement in this post, the part where you think I am somehow "profiting" from the war in Ukraine, or the fact that Russia tried to "protect <anyone> from tyranny".
I'm really struggling with this choice...
Let me give you the history... In 2014, there was a coup in Kiev and an Anti- Russian Pro-Western government was installed. The republics in Eastern Ukraine rejected the new government, which resulted in a civil war. Russia tried to settle things with diplomacy, but the West wanted this war. That's why they keep escalating and are now supplying missiles to launch them inside Russia.
The Russian government had legitimate concerns about the expansion of NATO for years because their country has been invaded by European powers countless times. The US and other NATO powers didn't respect Russia's security concerns at all and just kept expanding to the Russian border.
I mean we have NGOs writing white papers admitting that our main foreign policy goal is to eliminate or weaken any country that could be a rival to protect our economic hegemony. This stuff is out there hidden in plain sight for those who don't fall for propaganda. That's what they are trying to do in Ukraine now. The US and NATO provoked and are waging a proxy war in an attempt to destroy Russia. It's not working out for the the West though, is it?
It's not working out for the the West though, is it?
Let me give you the history... <snipped Russian nonsense>
The Russian government had legitimate concerns about the expansion of NATO for years because their country has been invaded by European powers countless times. The US and other NATO powers didn't respect Russia's security concerns at all and just kept expanding to the Russian border.
So you are concerned about NGOs writing white papers about foreign policy, while Russia is actively attacking NATO allies in Europe by trying to send bombs through DHL, and assassinate the CEO or Rheinmetall? Let's not even mention the literal weekly threats from Russia to nuke anyone who gives aid to Ukraine, or Putin's himself stating that his goal is to "reclaim Russian lands", since none of that matters if an NGO writes a white paper.I mean we have NGOs writing white papers admitting that our main foreign policy goal is to eliminate or weaken any country that could be a rival to protect our economic hegemony. This stuff is out there hidden in plain sight for those who don't fall for propaganda. That's what they are trying to do in Ukraine now. The US and NATO provoked and are waging a proxy war in an attempt to destroy Russia. It's not working out for the the West though, is it?
Welcome back, @Rasputin_VolLet me give you the history... In 2014, there was a coup in Kiev and an Anti- Russian Pro-Western government was installed. The republics in Eastern Ukraine rejected the new government, which resulted in a civil war. Russia tried to settle things with diplomacy, but the West wanted this war. That's why they keep escalating and are now supplying missiles to launch them inside Russia.
The Russian government had legitimate concerns about the expansion of NATO for years because their country has been invaded by European powers countless times. The US and other NATO powers didn't respect Russia's security concerns at all and just kept expanding to the Russian border.
I mean we have NGOs writing white papers admitting that our main foreign policy goal is to eliminate or weaken any country that could be a rival to protect our economic hegemony. This stuff is out there hidden in plain sight for those who don't fall for propaganda. That's what they are trying to do in Ukraine now. The US and NATO provoked and are waging a proxy war in an attempt to destroy Russia. It's not working out for the the West though, is it?
Who are you even referring to? I have been posting here for about 8 years. My old screen name was Long-suffering Vol and I recently changed it to Conan the Volbarian before the season.Welcome back, @Rasputin_Vol
I cited the white papers because they lay out our country's foreign policy goals and philosophy. And if you look at objective reality, you can see that is what they are doing. It's not just on paper. They are actually implementing that strategy on the world stage. Again, look at Iraq, Syria, Libya and Taiwan.Man, I do love it when someone says "let me give you the history", and then proceeds to regurgitate Russian nonsense that they consumed from Facebook/TikTok/Twitter.
Here's an actual history lesson.
Putin spent a decade trying to turn Ukraine into another Belarus before invading Crimea in 2014. In 2004, when Kuchma decided to not run for a third term, even though he was cleared to do so by the constitutional court, he endorsed Victor Yanukovych instead, who also happened to be Putin's choice of president for Ukraine. After an 'election' marred with fraud, and with Putin literally trying to kill the Yanukovych's opponent by poisoning him with dioxin, a new run-off election was held, and Yuschenko was declared the winner. Fast forward to 2010, and Yanukovych runs again, and manages to get elected on a platform of closer ties to the EU. He proceeds to spend the next three years, installing Russian mafia-state corruption in Ukraine's government, while still giving lip service to closer ties to the EU. In late 2013, Ukraine was slated to sign a trade deal with the EU, which Putin vehemently opposed, to the point that he had his cronies threaten Ukrainian statehood if they signed the agreement, and then went on to embargo literally all goods from Ukraine in an attempt to force Yanukovych to capitulate, which he did.
As you can of course imagine, the Ukrainian people, were not happy with Yanukovych's backtracking on his campaign promise of closer ties with the EU, and the Maidan protests began. After three months of Protests, Yanukovych ordered his Berkut security forces to kill protesters, and then absconded to Russia. After abandoning the presidency, the Rada (including members of his own party) voted overwhelmingly to remove him from office, and hold a new election. Yanukovych never returned to Ukraine to participate in the investigation into his actions, or contest his removal in the constitutional court. So to simplify it for your smooth brain, there was no " western coup" in Ukraine.
This is more Russian revanchist nonsense. Russia signed the NATO founding act in 1997, where they agreed that sovereign nations had the right to choose their own security arrangements, and then Russia went on to form their own Wish-version of NATO, the CSTO in 2002. The reality of NATO's expansion not being a legitimate concern by Russia, is further reinforced by Putin stating in 2002 that he doesn't see NATO as an enemy, the fact that Putin also approached Bill Clinton about Russia itself possibly joining NATO, and the fact that Putin is even on the record in Kremlin documents, stating in 2002 that even Ukraine joining NATO is not a concern.
This is compounded by the fact that since Russia escalated the 2014 invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO has expanded further with the addition of Sweden and Finland, and Russia has actually decreased its military presence on the Finnish border in response.
So you are concerned about NGOs writing white papers about foreign policy, while Russia is actively attacking NATO allies in Europe by trying to send bombs through DHL, and assassinate the CEO or Rheinmetall? Let's not even mention the literal weekly threats from Russia to nuke anyone who gives aid to Ukraine, or Putin's himself stating that his goal is to "reclaim Russian lands", since none of that matters if an NGO writes a white paper.
We did no such thing. The actual record shows Yanukovych ran on a pro western platform and pivoted to Russia once in office and got his ass ran out of the country by his own Parliamentary vote. He now lives in Russia after he left in the middle of the night, after agreeing to Parliament’s terms on him vacating office. Those are the actual facts of the matter. Your post is just the latest rehash of the Russian propaganda version of the story. Which is 100% uncut .I cited the white papers because they lay out our country's foreign policy goals and philosophy. And if you look at objective reality, you can see that is what they are doing. It's not just on paper. They are actually implementing that strategy on the world stage. Again, look at Iraq, Syria, Libya and Taiwan.
If you look at UN standards, countries are to respect other nations' sovereignty unless the governments of those countries are carrying out humans rights violations against their citizens. Ukraine was doing just that and that fact was confirmed by our own mainstream media and government before the war even started.
We installed a puppet government that is anti-Russian and have been arming them to the teeth for years. Our own government pulled out of a missile treaty with Russia a few years before the war and European leaders openly admitted they never intended to adhere to the Minsk Agreements in the first place. But yeah, it's totally all Russia's fault that this war happened and the West didn't do anything to provoke them.
Do you honestly believe the US wouldn't respond militarily if a hostile government was installed on its border and other countries were arming it to fight against us? If you believe that, I have some ocean front property in Mongolia for you....
I cited the white papers because they lay out our country's foreign policy goals and philosophy. And if you look at objective reality, you can see that is what they are doing. It's not just on paper. They are actually implementing that strategy on the world stage. Again, look at Iraq, Syria, Libya and Taiwan.
If you look at UN standards, countries are to respect other nations' sovereignty unless the governments of those countries are carrying out humans rights violations against their citizens. Ukraine was doing just that and that fact was confirmed by our own mainstream media and government before the war even started.
We installed a puppet government that is anti-Russian and have been arming them to the teeth for years. Our own government pulled out of a missile treaty with Russia a few years before the war and European leaders openly admitted they never intended to adhere to the Minsk Agreements in the first place. But yeah, it's totally all Russia's fault that this war happened and the West didn't do anything to provoke them.
Do you honestly believe the US wouldn't respond militarily if a hostile government was installed on its border and other countries were arming it to fight against us? If you believe that, I have some ocean front property in Mongolia for you....
I cited the white papers because they lay out our country's foreign policy goals and philosophy. And if you look at objective reality, you can see that is what they are doing. It's not just on paper. They are actually implementing that strategy on the world stage. Again, look at Iraq, Syria, Libya and Taiwan.
If you look at UN standards, countries are to respect other nations' sovereignty unless the governments of those countries are carrying out humans rights violations against their citizens. Ukraine was doing just that and that fact was confirmed by our own mainstream media and government before the war even started.
We installed a puppet government that is anti-Russian and have been arming them to the teeth for years. Our own government pulled out of a missile treaty with Russia a few years before the war and European leaders openly admitted they never intended to adhere to the Minsk Agreements in the first place. But yeah, it's totally all Russia's fault that this war happened and the West didn't do anything to provoke them.
Do you honestly believe the US wouldn't respond militarily if a hostile government was installed on its border and other countries were arming it to fight against us? If you believe that, I have some ocean front property in Mongolia for you....
Cool story bro.Who are you even referring to? I have been posting here for about 8 years. My old screen name was Long-suffering Vol and I recently changed it to Conan the Volbarian before the season.
I just happen to have different opinions on this issue because: I'm a Russian Orthodox Christian, I speak Russian, and have a ton of Russian friends. I even have a friend who lived in Donetsk City when Ukraine was shelling it and killing civilians for years before Russia intervened.
That's all I have to say on this. The facts are out there for those who care about the truth. Where was all the moral outrage and pearl clutching when the US invaded Iraq 20 years ago under false pretenses and turned it into a failed state? Unlike the US, Russia actually tried to settle things diplomatically.
Just look at Iraq, Syria, and Libya. Our government is the not the white knight you imagine it to be. It's power hungry and wants to destroy any country that doesn't bend to its will.
Even now as I type this post, our government is trying to spark a proxy war with China using Taiwan. And Taiwan is internationally recognized as Chinese territory!
If you're anyone looking for the U.S. for help i.e. a friend, my advice is don't walk.... ****ing run for your life i.e. Georgia, Romania, Hungry, and the Last Ukrainian. Those countries should expect more friendly sanctions and more "mostly peaceful" coups