DC_Vol
Bush league poster
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 22,315
- Likes
- 41,848
Putin has severely diminished his equipment and manpower to next to nothing. They are in no position to win any large skirmish. Shot their wad on the Ukrainians.
It wasn't going to happen. He gave up nothing.
Do you think Vance would ever upstage Trump like that? Or that Trump would let him?
No way. Never.
It wasn't going to happen. He gave up nothing.
Do you think Vance would ever upstage Trump like that? Or that Trump would let him?
No way. Never.
It wasn't going to happen. He gave up nothing.
Do you think Vance would ever upstage Trump like that? Or that Trump would let him?
No way. Never.
It wasn't going to happen. He gave up nothing.
Do you think Vance would ever upstage Trump like that? Or that Trump would let him?
No way. Never.
It wasn't going to happen. He gave up nothing.
Do you think Vance would ever upstage Trump like that? Or that Trump would let him?
No way. Never.
It wasn't going to happen. He gave up nothing.
Do you think Vance would ever upstage Trump like that? Or that Trump would let him?
No way. Never.
If you really think about, I would argue large military takeovers (multiple countries) are very hard if not impossible at scale (single countries are hard enough). The closest we really have seen is the Nazi blitzkrieg of WWII. Modern monitoring makes huge large scale movements easily traceable. I mean if you get into the beginning of this conflict, they came in and took the supported side of the east and made a quick line to the capital... other than the Ukrainian counterattack... its just meat grinding.Putin has severely diminished his equipment and manpower to next to nothing. They are in no position to win any large skirmish. Shot their wad on the Ukrainians.
Putin doesn't want Zelensky, he wants Ukraine. And what do you mean "give him" to Putin? As in let Putin kill him? Since when does the United States cater to desires of terrorists and dictators? Why are you siding with Russia?
Why are you siding with Russia?
If you really think about, I would argue large military takeovers (multiple countries) are very hard if not impossible at scale (single countries are hard enough). The closest we really have seen is the Nazi blitzkrieg of WWII. Modern monitoring makes huge large scale movements easily traceable. I mean if you get into the beginning of this conflict, they came in and took the supported side of the east and made a quick line to the capital... other than the Ukrainian counterattack... its just meat grinding.
Europe is in trouble and it has nothing to do with Russia, they will be fighting between themselves.... and none of them have much of a military. Nor do they have any ability to create one i.e. cheap energy. This is why mission creep was being used on Russia, in addition to them having tactical nukes.
3 years ago this thread was the Russians couldn't win against the JV, today they're Super Soldiers. Neither one is true.
What the Germans did in WWII is an absolutely amazing feat of engineering and planning that eventually fell apart by scale, that would not be possible today.
Worse than slaveryIt wasn't going to happen. It was all about bashing Zelensky, on TV, as though it was impromptu.
It wasn't. It was planned.
Absolutely disgusting and the worst embarrassment for the US of perhaps all time.
Pelosi and Chucky met with him beforehand to coach him. Didn’t go well lol. Trump is a ***** BOSS hoss.It wasn't going to happen. It was all about bashing Zelensky, on TV, as though it was impromptu.
It wasn't. It was planned.
Absolutely disgusting and the worst embarrassment for the US of perhaps all time.
In a social media post Kaja Kallas, the EU high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, wrote: “Ukraine is Europe! We stand by Ukraine. We will step up our support to Ukraine so that they can continue to fight back the aggressor.
“Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to us, Europeans, to take this challenge.”
Don’t believe anything Joe says.![]()
Biden says Ukraine has already won. He's right.
The inklings of a new narrative?responsiblestatecraft.org