Was that Al Matthews as head ref today?

#1

volspeach

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2004
Messages
4,260
Likes
2,997
#1
What did you think of the unsportsman like conduct call, I believe on Patterson (Not sure) and we saw a horse collar that was missed .
 
#5
#5
Don't remember but it was not Al. The white hat guy has been around a few years. He likes TV time
 
#8
#8
Not sure about the horse collar you're talking about, but the conduct call on CP was the right call. The rule states that if you celebrate before the score, then then score is negated. Sucks, but it is what it is.
 
#10
#10
Not sure about the horse collar you're talking about, but the conduct call on CP was the right call. The rule states that if you celebrate before the score, then then score is negated. Sucks, but it is what it is.

I disagree but thanks for your explaining...
 
#12
#12
Not sure about the horse collar you're talking about, but the conduct call on CP was the right call. The rule states that if you celebrate before the score, then then score is negated. Sucks, but it is what it is.

I see worse not called all the time. That call and the rule in general is garbage and ftr I'd say the same thing if an identical call had been made against Missouri.
 
#14
#14
Not sure about the horse collar you're talking about, but the conduct call on CP was the right call. The rule states that if you celebrate before the score, then then score is negated. Sucks, but it is what it is.

No it wasnt the right call.........CP has been doing that ALL YEAR, why wasnt the other 5 or 6 times called?
 
#15
#15
Not sure about the horse collar you're talking about, but the conduct call on CP was the right call. The rule states that if you celebrate before the score, then then score is negated. Sucks, but it is what it is.

Actually ESPN talked about this and the rule states that it has to do with taunting and not just celebrating. ESPN guys said officials did not interpret the rule correctly. Regardless common sense has been thrown out the door. What CP did was not egregious.
 
#16
#16
The rule states that if the runner changes his stride before getting into the endzone in a manner of celebration, it is a penalty.

Per the rule, it was correctly called.

The rule sucks, but the call was correct
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top