Tastylicks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2021
- Messages
- 1,702
- Likes
- 410
no reason to go back to the office
There are way more distractions at the office. I cant go thirty minutes without an interruption at the office. I could go hours at home without being disturbed.There are many reasons for companies to prefer workers on-site rather than remote, both subjective (feeling that people produce "better" work and are stronger employees when in physical proximity to coworkers) and objective (fewer distractions in the office than at home).
Either way, if your company wants you back in the office and you don't want to return then don't be surprised if they hand you a pink slip.
There are many reasons for companies to prefer workers on-site rather than remote, both subjective (feeling that people produce "better" work and are stronger employees when in physical proximity to coworkers) and objective (fewer distractions in the office than at home).
Either way, if your company wants you back in the office and you don't want to return then don't be surprised if they hand you a pink slip.
If commercial real estate takes a big hit then that will have a ripple effect. Companies that manage those properties, commercial construction, and more. It’s already happening in some bigger cities where the real estate is crazy expensive.I wonder if corporate real estate will take a big hit in the long term. You’d think a lot of companies are going to see the value in not having to pay for office space and employee accommodation that no longer seems necessary
Not better but some companies flat don’t care and some of that is because people in this country no longer do quality work. There an epidemic of laziness, incompetence, and a lack of caring. I seriously had a 28-year-old tell me about a year or so ago that simply coming in consistently for his 8 hours a day was enough to be ahead of most in his generation. That was his mindset. Showing up was enough. And he isn’t alone, I assure you. So when a company decides to pay someone in another country a third of what an American would make for a work product that isn’t as big of a drop off as it used to be that company doesn’t think twice.Better? I can tell you haven't worked with many
So the journalists are more than ca[able of doing their jobs from home, yet you want to punish them by threatening to get non-Americans at lower wages to replace them?Yes it is and it’s also true and you know it. Anybody with a work visa and a tech degree will do the job cheaper and most likely better. Walmart, Disney, etc already have thousands and thousands of them.
So the journalists are more than ca[able of doing their jobs from home, yet you want to punish them by threatening to get non-Americans at lower wages to replace them?
Boomer logic...