We have to Earn the Committee's respect

[Domestic Silence]

Vandy got a four seed, what the hell have they ever proven? Last year? Tell me about their tourney last year...That's why I find this thread as a huge FAIL.

 

[getyopopcornready]

I can see why I would have to remind you, considering it was 10 years ago. Hell, it's been 6 since they made it out of the sweet sixteen. Now that is what I call recent tourney success, right there.

But you asked what Duke has done in the last decade and they won the title 9 years ago. Which is within the last decade.

See, a decade is 10 years long. So since Duke won the title 9 years ago, that means they have done something in the last decade.

Oh one other thing. 10 > 9. I think you may have had it backwards there.

 

[NochNoch]

That doesn't mesh with your comment.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I think Zona might have been a bit higher than 5 in that title game.

 

[SaintBruce]

That doesn't mesh with your comment.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Uh yes it does. I said they haven't beaten a team higher than a 5. And they haven't. What doesn't mesh?

 

[SaintBruce]

But you asked what Duke has done in the last decade

uuuuh


No, I didn't. Go back and re read what I actually said.

 

[hatvol96]

EVERY team has these losses.

Every team has two blowout losses to non tournament teams? I think not.

 

[getyopopcornready]

uuuuh


No, I didn't. Go back and re read what I actually said.

Ok you said they haven't beaten anyone higher than a 5 seed in a decade.

The year
2001

The teams
Duke (1 seed) - 82
Arizona (2 seed)((higher than 5 seed)) - 72

 

[SaintBruce]

Every team has two blowout losses to non tournament teams? I think not.

I didn't qualify losses and neither did the poster I was responding to.

Not sure why it makes a difference anyways.

 

[SaintBruce]

Ok you said they haven't beaten anyone higher than a 5 seed in a decade.

The year
2001

The teams
Duke (1 seed) - 82
Arizona (2 seed)((higher than 5 seed)) - 72

Dang, got me by 1 year. Good work.

 

[NYYVol]

I didn't qualify losses and neither did the poster I was responding to.

Not sure why it makes a difference anyways.

You just argue for the sake of arguing.

I thoroughly enjoy seeing you bring a butterknife to a gun fight, though.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[SaintBruce]

You just argue for the sake of arguing.

I thoroughly enjoy seeing you bring a butterknife to a gun fight, though.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I'm glad you enjoy something. I figured up until now your entire life was filled with doom and gloom.

 

[NYYVol]

I'm glad you enjoy something. I figured up until now your entire life was filled with doom and gloom.

And as usual, you would be extremely wrong.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[volfanstuckinga]

I was referring to mid-majors like ETSU, Middle Tennessee State etc., teams we did not beat consistently prior to Pearl. If you think we should beat Vandy, SC, etc. twice every year you are delusional. SC beat UK this year for God's sake, and Vandy can and has beaten the best of the best in Nashville.

Yes, I think we should beat Vandy on our home floor EVERY year...and I said USCw...as in USCWEST!!! And they SUCK and we should have beat them. And getting DRILLED by UGA was inexusable.