We really looking to take 8 OL?

#1

Hens67

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
4,263
Likes
132
#1
Pair, Fulton, James, Green, Cullen, Stone, Robinson, & Coleman?
 
#7
#7
Pair, Fulton, James, Green, Cullen, Stone, Robinson, & Coleman?

I'm going to say we take 6 for sure...I think it's Green, James, Cullen, Stone, Fulton, Pair...

I think we could take a 7th if we miss Willis, Quarles or Lemonier...but I think we land all 3 of them so I'm going with 6
 
#8
#8
oh i don't have a problem with it...figured we would take 5-6 considering all the other people we are in on
 
#9
#9
the line was already thin this past year and aren't 4 senior starters and 2 senior backups not returning? if so then you should expect them to pursue a large number of OL.
 
#11
#11
I hope so, we need all those fellas!
 
#16
#16
I'm going to say we take 6 for sure...I think it's Green, James, Cullen, Stone, Fulton, Pair...

I think we could take a 7th if we miss Willis, Quarles or Lemonier...but I think we land all 3 of them so I'm going with 6

You mean Wilson? Willis would be on the DL or did I miss something?
 
#17
#17
we only have 7 or 8 spots left right?

well if we take 5 more lineman then we are turning some good players away

dixon, hampton, willis, nance&rogers duo, jones, nelson, simms, all on our board
 
Last edited:
#18
#18
You mean Wilson? Willis would be on the DL or did I miss something?

I think he's saying if we miss on all three of those D linemen, that we'll take an additional O lineman. I

'm not entirely sure that I see that happening, but I agree that its what they'll do if that is the case.
 
#24
#24
I agree with LV & Hens67. IMO we pursue all 8, incl. our 3 commits, hoping to have 6 OL by NSD. That still gives us room for only 4 more at other positions (assuming no de-commits, of course).
 

VN Store



Back
Top