Well written Voepel piece on Sue Bird

#26
#26
lvocd said:
deleted

Hope everyone is okay! I certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone having a mental breakdown or, worse, a life-threatening aneurysm.
Click to expand...

I initially had no interest in the article.Not because I dislike Sue Bird, I don't know enough about her to like or dislike her, but just because an article on Sue Bird didn't interest me. The same way I don't like or dislike patio chairs, but I wouldn't be interested to read an article on them. But, I went ahead and read the article yesterday because of the responses in this thread. Turned out to be a good read - In my opinion.

As for posting it on this board - it doesn't offend me in the least. I assume your thought process was: (1) Sue Bird played for Uconn (2) Uconn is the best WBB program and a hated rival of UT (3) This forum seems to be the most catch-all forum about women's sports on Volnation (4) I'll post it with a clear title and a person that wants to click on it can and a person that does not can skip it. Makes perfect sense to me.

There are only 50 threads on the first page, dating back to June 28. We average about 2 new threads a day. It's not like we have to wade knee deep through new threads with a machete to clear a path to the one we are interested in. If people start posting 25 threads a day that are only tangentially related to the Lady Vols then maybe I'll change my mind. But for right now I think if the title offends you or doesn't interest you - don't click on it. JMO:crazy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#27
#27
volnationnj said:
?????
I was over it, until you deemed it necessary to interject yourself in a discussion that ended long before you posted.
Did you not see a flurry of posts between Madtown and myself, in the middle of the afternoon, then a cessation on the thread until you posted more than 8 hours later ?
Can you explain to me why some posters feel compelled to act as a self appointed moderator and tell other members that they should " Get over it and move on ? Especially a discussion that had, in fact, ended long before you posted.
You must have twisted yourself into a pretzel, using logic as convoluted as you did, to come to the conclusion that Madtown was right and I was wrong, when we are in agreement on both the SB article and Sly's definition. Either we are both right or we are both wrong. Which is it ?
Click to expand...

Like I said, move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top