What an idiot! Virginia Governor Notes 'Major Omission' on Slavery in Dixie Month Dec

#1

OrangeEmpire

The White Debonair
Joined
Nov 28, 2005
Messages
74,988
Likes
60
#1
FOXNews.com - Virginia Governor Notes 'Major Omission' on Slavery in Dixie Month Decree

McDonnell became the first governor since 2001 to designate April to commemorate the secessionist, slaveholding South.
The last governor to do that was fellow Republican Jim Gilmore. Since then, Democrats Mark Warner and Tim Kaine refused to issue the proclamation.
Warner, in his first year as governor in 2002, discontinued the proclamation sought each spring by the Sons of Confederate Veterans. Before that, the proclamations were met annually with denunciations from black groups.
McDonnell's initial decision not to mention slavery in the proclamation drew sharp criticism.
Black members of the General Assembly, all Democrats, said McDonnell's proclamation was "offensive and offered a disturbing revision of the Civil War and the brutal era that followed."
"Virginia has worked hard to move beyond the very things for which Gov. McDonnell seems nostalgic," said a statement issued by the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus.
Virginia was home to more of the war's battles than any other state, and its Capitol in Richmond doubled as the Confederate seat of government.
McDonnell said slavery was not the lone issue contested in the war that ended with Gen. Robert E. Lee's surrender in 1865 at Appomattox Court House, about 75 miles west of Richmond.
"There were any number of aspects to that conflict between the states. Obviously it involved slavery, it involved other issues, but I focused on the ones that I thought were most significant for Virginia," McDonnell said.
Former Gov. L. Douglas Wilder, who in 1989 became the nation's first elected black governor, said no discussion of the Old South or the Confederacy is balanced without mentioning the human bondage it tolerated.

Wow.... just wow......

I am with Gov. Wilder on this.

I am overly fascinated with the Civil War but dang on man.......

Confederate History Month...... really............

All the gains the republicans have had and Confederate History Month.............
 
#2
#2
Only uneducated drama queens would have an issue with this observance (cue LG, mn, and bam).
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3
#3
To say the Civil War was all about slavery is a revision, as well. The general public has no realistic concept of the war.
 
#4
#4
To say the Civil War was all about slavery is a revision, as well. The general public has no realistic concept of the war.
Bingo. Sad, but this is how it is for most of history. BTW, have you looked @ a recent history textbook? Wow!!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#5
#5
To say the Civil War was all about slavery is a revision, as well. The general public has no realistic concept of the war.

They can say it was about states rights, but they really just didn't want to change their way of life. That way of life consisted of oppressing a group of color for their skin color.

Don't use terms like revisionist history unless you have a clue what you are talking about.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#6
#6
Only uneducated drama queens would have an issue with this observance (cue LG, mn, and bam).
Posted via VolNation Mobile

This is a classic risk reward scenario. Why even do this as nothing positive is gonna happen.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#7
#7
Regardless of what the causes of the war were (there were many and the issue of slavery was of course one) the purpose of the celebration is to honor the Confederate soldier.

The vast majority of Confederate soldiers were far to poor to own slaves. They were men that did what all good men would do, defend their homes and state against a foreign invasion.
 
Last edited:
#8
#8
They can say it was about states rights, but they really just didn't want to change their way of life. That way of life consisted of oppressing a group of color for their skin color.

Don't use terms like revisionist history unless you have a clue what you are talking about.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Define "they". The average Confederate foot soldier certainly had no reason to protect slavery.
Try again.
 
#9
#9
Define "they". The average Confederate foot soldier certainly had no reason to protect slavery.
Try again.

Well that argument is smilar to saying most Nazi soldiers had nothing against Jews
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#10
#10
Regardless of what the causes of the war were (there were many and the issue of slavery was of course one) the purpose of the celebration is to honor the Confederate soldier.

The vast majority of Confederate soldiers were far to poor to own slaves. They were men that did what all good men would do, defend their homes and state against a foreign invasion.

a foreign nation?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#12
#12
Only uneducated drama queens would have an issue with this observance (cue LG, mn, and bam).
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Thanks.

I actually enjoy studying Confederate generals. For the most part, they were strategically better and had very little to work with.

A few were against slavery, but most had no problem with slavery. Slavery was also concentrated in a few states, with massive plantation owners buying them. The average person in the South couldn't afford one.

Regardless this is stupid, but this is not surprising coming from McDonnell.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
#13
#13
FOXNews.com - Virginia Governor Notes 'Major Omission' on Slavery in Dixie Month Decree



Wow.... just wow......

I am with Gov. Wilder on this.

I am overly fascinated with the Civil War but dang on man.......

Confederate History Month...... really............

All the gains the republicans have had and Confederate History Month.............

I don't know why you're surprised. This is the new breed of Republican. The Moral majority, secessionist southerners define the Republican party.
 
#14
#14
I don't know why you're surprised. This is the new breed of Republican. The Moral majority, secessionist southerners define the Republican party.

That's not true. Dumb move for sure.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#15
#15
Regardless of what the causes of the war were (there were many and the issue of slavery was of course one) the purpose of the celebration is to honor the Confederate soldier.

The vast majority of Confederate soldiers were far to poor to own slaves. They were men that did what all good men would do, defend their homes and state against a foreign invasion.

Please enlighten me, who fired first?

I don't recall The United States of America firing first.
 
#16
#16
I don't know why you're surprised. This is the new breed of Republican. The Moral majority, secessionist southerners define the Republican party.

Better than the modern Dem party: America hating, marxist, socialist and Black Theology.
 
#18
#18
I agree this is a stupid move but to try and define this war as a battle over slavery alone is just as revisionist as not mentioning it at all.
 
#19
#19
Clearly I hate America, you caught me.

I hate it so bad that I want to succeed from the United...

oh wait.

Your side, especially your President and the crowd he has surrounded himself with hates what this country has tradionally stood for.
 
#20
#20
Your side, especially your President and the crowd he has surrounded himself with hates what this country has tradionally stood for.

Oh, I'm sure.

Have to hate those traditional 1960 values.

Actually if I believe I'm correct, the founding fathers even explicitly said that the Democratic Party was evil, even though the modern party wasn't founded until 1828. Yep, I read the constitution too, I know it's in there somewhere.

Hell, I think they went to church every day too, even though 3/4's of them were deists. How coincidental.

It's funny, I think Republicans of late have destroyed the tradition our founding fathers created, which is what the Democrats stand for.

You see, I can play this game too.

Might as well rephrase the comment to what white, southern, protestants stand for - I think you meet the qualifications for that.
 
#21
#21
Clearly I hate America, you caught me.

I hate it so bad that I want to succeed from the United...

oh wait.

I haven't seen one post, since you have been in here, to lead me to believe that you give two craps about the prosperity of this nation. Instead, you focus on party lines and trying to throw republicans under the bus because they don't go with the touchy-feelly democratic party, and their conquest to secure votes from the bottom part of society.
 
#22
#22
I haven't seen one post, since you have been in here, to lead me to believe that you give two craps about the prosperity of this nation. Instead, you focus on party lines and trying to throw republicans under the bus because they don't go with the touchy-feelly democratic party, and their conquest to secure votes from the bottom part of society.

Coming from the one posting Catholic hating drivel.

Pretty hilarious actually, I'm sure you want the President to "succeed." We all know how this entire board is against the radical Marxist take over.

You go from prosperity of this nation to describing how "touch-feelly" Democratic Party is and bottom votes.

Sounds like you are against prosperity.

We must fear those at the bottom part of society. Those damn Catholics and their blasphemy, not to mention the minorities taking over our nation. Those who can't pay the bills, who happen to be communist bums.
 
#23
#23
Oh, I'm sure.

Have to hate those traditional 1960 values.

Actually if I believe I'm correct, the founding fathers even explicitly said that the Democratic Party was evil, even though the modern party wasn't founded until 1828. Yep, I read the constitution too, I know it's in there somewhere.

Hell, I think they went to church every day too, even though 3/4's of them were deists. How coincidental.

It's funny, I think Republicans of late have destroyed the tradition our founding fathers created, which is what the Democrats stand for.

You see, I can play this game too.

Might as well rephrase the comment to what white, southern, protestants stand for - I think you meet the qualifications for that.

I'm not quite sure if you are aware that the Democrats used to more like the modern Republicans, instead of the modern liberal of today. In fact, Democrats and Republicans used to go against the Federalist party of early years, because the Federalist party believed in a fiscally strong central government. Honestly though, it's all political BS, but if the country was run by the early Democrats and Republicans of this nation, we would all be better off. All the good parts of the Republican party came from Democrats leaving their own party, because basically the liberal portion of their party were basically the hippies of the mid 1800s.
 
#24
#24
We must fear those at the bottom part of society. Those damn Catholics and their blasphemy, not to mention the minorities taking over our nation. Those who can't pay the bills, who happen to be communist bums.

it's so cute, you're becoming more like LG every day.
 
#25
#25
Oh, I'm sure.

Have to hate those traditional 1960 values.

Actually if I believe I'm correct, the founding fathers even explicitly said that the Democratic Party was evil, even though the modern party wasn't founded until 1828. Yep, I read the constitution too, I know it's in there somewhere.

Hell, I think they went to church every day too, even though 3/4's of them were deists. How coincidental.

It's funny, I think Republicans of late have destroyed the tradition our founding fathers created, which is what the Democrats stand for.

You see, I can play this game too.

Might as well rephrase the comment to what white, southern, protestants stand for - I think you meet the qualifications for that.

When did you and your side start concerning yourselves with what the founders wanted and what the Constitution says?
 

VN Store



Back
Top