I am an agnostic. There is a Supernatural, Divine Creator. This being certainly has the potential to be "personal" and to perform "miracles", yet I have not been personally approached by such a being, therefore, I remain unconvinced.
Believers might take this opportunity to state that I have not tried to establish a personal relationship with such a being. I've been to multitudes of Catholic Churches, Protestant Churches, Hindu Temples, and Mosques (have not been to a Synagogue, because, frankly, they are places for teaching the Torah and the Talmud, not for worship); I have read the Bible, the Koran, the Upanishads, and the Bhagavad-Gita; if there was a "door", I have certainly knocked on it. I finally decided to stop knocking. If the all-powerful being requires a personal relationship, then that being certainly has the power to establish one with me.
Having (seemingly) failed to establish this personal relationship on your own, you now simply rely upon G/god to do bridge the chasm, instead. If I've accurately represented your position, it is profoundly important - and rare, I believe. Many others simply could not stand upon that uncertain ground, or for very long. Most c/wouldn't tolerate the mystery, and would either feign an experiential awareness or choose outright unbelief, instead.
Given the choice, would you prefer to have a relationship with this g/God, or not, and what do you imagine that experience would look like, if obtained?
That children are our future?
You obviously want to participate, or you wouldn't have provided any comment at all. So, do so.
There are no atheists in fox holes.
No, but I personally know of several who were in a ship's aft engine room and only several yards away from a main engine embroiled in fire and threatening explosion.
The effects of their atheism was of little consequence in that moment, and left undiscussed.
I don't even know why we need the term "atheist". We don't have a special term for a non-belief in astrology. I see it as more of a philosophy of reason and expectation of reasonable evidence, with anything.
Can reason be attributed to non-believers, alone? Is it possible to believe something - or that it may be true - in the absence of supporting evidence?
He has not done so to me. Might he have done so to other persons, of course. For them, their knowledge and personal relationship is justified; I, however, will not stand convicted on hearsay alone.
You believe that any possible conviction to be unjust, until this g/God makes these things known to you, directly? Not intended to imply anything, just wanted to be certain that I understood your point.
It's an incredibly personal question, and one which you certainly don't have to answer - but I'll offer it, in case you wouldn't mind:
Why is it that you believe that this g/God has seemingly withheld this personal relationship from you, at least to this point, despite the fact that you have earnestly sought it?