I will say however there have been coaching changes at UGA, USCe, UK, Arky, LSU and Ala maybe Auburn with Lebo so it's not like CBP is beating a strong league.
I guess my only thing is I hope it doesn't turn into that CPF thing where they had to keep adjusting his having the highest winning % if anyone knows what I'm referring to.
Yea I do. First it was the highest winning percentage among active coaches, and then it was among coaches with 10+ years experience, etc.
Let me simplify: UT has won more SEC basketball games over the four years Pearl has been the Vols' head coach than any other SEC program.
Does that clear things up?
Yea, thanks. Don't get me wrong that is great and I'm proud of Pearl and the job he has done. However, considering the large amount of turnover in the SEC since he's been at UT, is it as special as it sounds?
He has won more SEC games than any coach during his tenure. That is what Griff means.
I will say however there have been coaching changes at UGA, USCe, UK, Arky, LSU and Ala maybe Auburn with Lebo so it's not like CBP is beating a strong league.
I guess my only thing is I hope it doesn't turn into that CPF thing where they had to keep adjusting his having the highest winning % if anyone knows what I'm referring to.
1) Truly; how big of an accomplishment is that? As JZ points out, there has been coaching changes at numerous SEC schools.
2) Why is SEC record the measuring stick of success over Overall record? It is not like you have to win your conference to advance to the tournament. Overall record seems to carry more weight with the selection committee. What am I missing; why is SEC record so important in the eyes of Pearl supporters? Doesnt it reek of Fulmerism?
Yes, if you read above, I definitely concede that there have been coaching changes. But finishing ahead of Fla. who won 2 NCs during this time is definitely an accomplishment. And, I wasn't making an argument that this was the most significant statistic that one could possibly measure, I was just clarifying for JC what Griff was meaning. But, I would argue that having the most wins in a major BCS conference is a major accomplishment. If Phillip Fulmer could say that, he wouldn't be at home sitting on his ass.
I know that you were just clarifying and I was not calling you out. I have just heard that statistic thrown out over and over.
In football the goal is to win the SECC. With that you stand a reasonable shot at playing for the NC. So in Football, SEC wins are critical. Fulmer did not have enough and he is gone.
In Basketball, the goal is to have a high seat placement for the NCAA Tournament. With that, the road to the NC is easier. IMO, SEC victories are not as important as Overall victories except for those seeking moral victories.
I understand,, and you are absolutely right about SEC relative to football and basketball respectively. I'm a Pearl supporter, but I certainly don't use that statistic to somehow pretend this year wasn't disappointing. I think .......Pearl would agree that it was.
I have my doubts and that is the rub for me. When I hear from someone supposedly close to him (as Griff purports to be) that he is disappointed in us, then I have to wonder if he is disappointed about the right things.
I hope that I am not. What gives me hope is the mea culpa he did after the 2nd KY game.