Velo Vol
Internets Expert
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 36,854
- Likes
- 17,290
Thinking about the question again and I think next step will involve personal gun ownership. Not sure tne form it will take, perhaps a form of liability insurance or increased taxes on gun licenses. Again, not sure, but the fast and furious scandal seems to lay the ground work for tougher gun control, now you have SCOTUS reinforcing Congresses tax power. Bad feeling about the 2nd ammendment.
There has been no overreaction.
History proves that if you give the government a inch they will take a mile. Sooner or later the morons in government will run with this ruling and begin implementing ridiculous legislation.
Thinking about the question again and I think next step will involve personal gun ownership. Not sure tne form it will take, perhaps a form of liability insurance or increased taxes on gun licenses. Again, not sure, but the fast and furious scandal seems to lay the ground work for tougher gun control, now you have SCOTUS reinforcing Congresses tax power. Bad feeling about the 2nd ammendment.
Another one that is being implemented in the form of bans is a sugar tax. NY has banned sales of certain sized softdrinks. Now they have a clear path to just place a per ounce tax on them. The bigger you buy, the more you pay. It will be much the same as the tax on alcohol and tobacco.
Look at income tax withholding just as an example.... It was supposed to end with the conclusion of WW2, yet as soon as the govt saw that folks started making the distinction between gross pay and "take home" pay it was game over....
With F&F breathing down their necks, I don't think we will see any 2nd amendment infringement until the Cons lose the house again. There have already been several ideas floated for taxes on cars.
Obama administration floats draft plan to tax cars by the mile - The Hill's Floor Action
Is just one. They want to put a mileage counter on your car(s).
K. You want me to let you know about ANY deaths involving tractors and not just some silly BS you came up with to try and appear funny?
Wasn't trying to be funny, was just highlighting the silliness of bringing offroad and farm equipment into a discussion when those vehicles make up less than 1/2% of what we were talking about.......Guess what, NEWS FLASH, no license required to drive those vehicles either. I was driving a tractor in S. Georgia when I was 8.
This sounds like a blueprint for what's going to come in the near future... I have always been kind of leery of those little keychain card that grocery stores (and other businesses also...) give out as "discount cards".... Seems line a great way to build up a database of purchasing decisions to later be used against you. "You were involved in a drunk driving accident?? Well.... We see from our Publix database here you buy 2 cases of beer a week!"... Or, "You want coverage/treatment/surgery for XYZ condition? Well... We see from our database you smoke 3 packs of cigarettes a day and eat fast food at least 9 times a week on average"... Maybe I should go fashion myself one of those tinfoil hats but I really don't trust anything the government says. It's been that way most of my adult life but yesterday was (yet another) serious wake up call...
I already have an odometer and plenty of people already report annual mileage for their cars they use for business purposes. I would actually be ok with a road use tax if that lowered my income tax.
The way F and F is being blamed on weak gun control laws by the left makes me worried they could figure out a way to use taxing powers to increase gun control.
Wasn't trying to be funny, was just highlighting the silliness of bringing offroad and farm equipment into a discussion when those vehicles make up less than 1/2% of what we were talking about.
I was more refuting the argument that state law REQUIRED vehicle owners to have insurance. Granted, the exception is minuscule but it does exist. The requirement exists in order for motorists to use public roads... And I would say this clause exists not necessarily to protect auto owners so much as to protect the state from litigation.