SayUWantAreVOLution
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 8,360
- Likes
- 10,464
It's not the rookie contract. Each bit of mileage on his legs shortens his career on the END of usefulness in the league.It's a math equation. If he is a projected round 2-3 guy you go and get your money. If he is a back half of the draft guy you "could" consider staying for the right amount of NIL. The fact is a $1M+, if properly managed, is better in hand than potential earnings down the road.
Risk management is also an issue with likeliness to improve draft position and potential future earnings against potential for injury. The offense should only get better as Nico matures so I believe his main concern would be draft forecasting and potential injury (which can be insured against).
As others have said the RB postiion, unelss your name is Barkley or Henry, isn't valued as much as it used to be in the NFL due to shelf life of RBs.
He's not, hopefully, looking at "matching the rookie money" but on getting in and getting to he next contract.
What he'd be cutting into is when his "that's all the carries he's got in him" time runs out. Taking those snaps in college next year vs having an extra year in the league on the back end of his career when the money is WAY WAY WAY out of NIL range if he's successful.
Those looking at "we can match rookie money" aren't looking at it correctly. Can we match the money in his last year? No...... No way.