bamawriter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 26,251
- Likes
- 16,529
So, the problem isn't that Alabama pays players. The problem is that Tennessee is cheap.
Of course they did. I have no problem with that, because I don't live in the kind of fantasy world where Tennessee fired Pruitt because of "integrity."
I think what he is saying is Tennessee isn’t given the same carte blanche look away that Bama gets from the office in Birmingham. I don’t know if that’s true.
But let me ask you this, if Bama and UT were cheating equally across the board, which program would get punished worse should it come out?
Recruiting rankings say otherwise.
How so? Pruitt pulled in good classes and won a few battles over other SEC schools. The fact that To'o To'o originally signed with UT over Bama would suggest that Saban wasn't paying significantly more than Pruitt. All things being equal, who in their right mind would choose Jeremy Pruitt over Nick Saban?
What do you mean? Look at my post. Those are the two right off the bat I can come up with. Give me time later to peruse Rivals and I can give other examples.
We all cheat, got it. But to think Bama doesn’t take it to another level is naive.
Sorry, my bad. Completely misread the first part of your post.
To your point, what about the coaches in the Saban tree that have done just fine? That some dudes aren't very good when given promotions doesn't mean that they suck entirely. Some guys are positions coaches for life. Some are coordinators. Some make for decent mid-major HCs.
I’m talking about the recruits they can bring in. Most when the leave Bama for similar jobs are all of sudden not as good, and pedestrian coaches at other places are all of a sudden recruiting gods.