Chilmonty
Obviously, ESPN HATES US!
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2007
- Messages
- 6,811
- Likes
- 12,046
By what criteria? Without even putting any thought into it I've got Gault above CP from a purely athletic standpoint.
Well, Gault could certainly outrun him on the track, but I've never seen any player make a potential tackler look so foolish as CP did, nor have I seen one player that couldn't be tackled in open field unless surrounded by several defenders - like CP. Willie wasn't in CP's league in this category.
Gault was a great player, but did fall down too often after catching a short pass. I always thought he did it to avoid getting his head taken off by a defender (understandable). Somewhat similar to how Hunter played this year.
I actually had a class with Willie my senior year. I think it was called "Enivironmental Law". Willie was a smart, articulate young man.
That's actually a pretty good argument for CP being a better reciever than Gault (more elusive running with the football, etc) but that doesn't necessarily make him "more athletic". It's why I asked about the criteria. Take literally the best athlete you can think of that's not a football player and put him on a football team. He may well and truly suck at football but that wouldn't keep him from being the best athlete on the team, would it?
Not trying to bust your chops but when you spin up a sentence with absolutes like "most" and "ever" and apply them to something as gray as "athletic" it can get a bit sketchy. See what I'm saying?