(wilburnVol @ Dec 25 said:Then you've seen and heard it from behind your crack pipe.
Vol football fans are pissed off big time and with the recent articles by the NFL folks and another round of Phil's delusional "we were almost 9-2" vomit, they are fit to be tied...or tie him up. Phil ought to hide out and shut up for awhile unless he is so depressed as to be suicidal. Sure sounds like he's trying awfully hard to do himself in.
As usual, the Phil Trolls roll out lies like "end of the world", not one post has claimed anything of the sort. Truth is, even among those that woud like to see Fulmer canned, and I am one of them, I expect that we will see very good football but not necessarily in the near future. The only question is can Phil deliver it?
Time will tell. He built this crumbling ship, I'll give him one more year to right it or, as far as I am concerned, he can go down with it and take his perverted view of reality with him. :focus:
(volmanbill @ Dec 26 said:Now I remember why I stopped checking the board in the latter part of the season. If I wanted to hear Vol "fans" rant about how Phil (or any other part of the program) sucks, I'd go to a Bama board. Geesh.....y'all must've gotten lumps of coal in your stockings. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
I LOVE MY VOLS, TOP TO BOTTOM, WIN OR LOSE GO BIG ORANGE!!!!!!
nice post dizzy(CSpindizzy @ Dec 26 said:I find it amusing that when things go wrong you aren't supposed to criticise. You're supposed to roll over and say nothing but positive things and support the wrong not matter what. Any form of criticism is blasphemy, traitorous, etc.
I think that had people followed this advice we'd see the same ol' staff back next year with the same mistakes, same vanilla, play calling, same underdeveloped players, same penalties, and same record. Thank God not everyone are blindly devoted sheep who would follow someone off the edge of a cliff if it came to it.
(wilburnVol @ Dec 25 said:Hear ye, hear ye...
All Phil Trolls,
Please line up and follow the lemming in front.
Thank you for you blind allegiance.
Signed,
Lemming Leader Phil Fulmer.
:mf_surrender: :mf_surrender: :mf_surrender: :mf_surrender: :mf_surrender: :mf_surrender:
(CSpindizzy @ Dec 26 said:I find it amusing that when things go wrong you aren't supposed to criticise. You're supposed to roll over and say nothing but positive things and support the wrong not matter what. Any form of criticism is blasphemy, traitorous, etc.
I think that had people followed this advice we'd see the same ol' staff back next year with the same mistakes, same vanilla, play calling, same underdeveloped players, same penalties, and same record. Thank God not everyone are blindly devoted sheep who would follow someone off the edge of a cliff if it came to it.
(bleedingorange @ Dec 26 said:i dont think he was referring to all the troops, just the one he was arguing with
i know i said i would drop it, but i have to protect myself. and bleeding orange can back me on this.(U-T @ Dec 26 said:You should have seen the thread that got deleted.
Attacked basically everyone serving in Iraq. He's lucky that good one got deleted
well i never said anything about THE troops. i was just spouting off about u_t. if everyone wants to take it personally that is fine with me. and go ahead and put ur money on u-t, usaf. i have always been an underdog. i dont fight fair.(USAF_Vol @ Dec 26 said:It's the troops that give you the right to say anything you want. IMO, if you two can't stand each other, block each other or meet somewhere and duke it out (No offense, but my money would be on UT).
Now go watch the Memphis-Akron game and try to figure out why we aren't playing in a bowl while these chumps are.
My money would be on CBC. I think he would, if he were having some difficulty in this hypothetical fight, be willing to make some changes in his strategy. Maybe fire his cornerman if needed. U-T would be afraid to make the adjustments during the fight, sticking with the ones that got him there etc. He would probably waste his superior talent trying to rely on his defense. Eventually in the latter rounds U-T would tire and CBC would KO him.(USAF_Vol @ Dec 26 said:It's the troops that give you the right to say anything you want. IMO, if you two can't stand each other, block each other or meet somewhere and duke it out (No offense, but my money would be on UT).
Now go watch the Memphis-Akron game and try to figure out why we aren't playing in a bowl while these chumps are.
lol. thanks for the support rockydoc. but i asked i just want to ignore that pig and move on.(rockydoc @ Dec 26 said:My money would be on CBC. I think he would, if he were having some difficulty in this hypothetical fight, be willing to make some changes in his strategy. Maybe fire his cornerman if needed. U-T would be afraid to make the adjustments during the fight, sticking with the ones that got him there etc. He would probably waste his superior talent trying to rely on his defense. Eventually in the latter rounds U-T would tire and CBC would KO him.![]()
usaf, cbc and U-T were having a very heated argument last nite. It was only between them two and nobody else. Things were said by both that made the other pretty mad and the rest is history.(checkerboard_charly @ Dec 26 said:well i never said anything about THE troops. i was just spouting off about u_t. if everyone wants to take it personally that is fine with me. and go ahead and put ur money on u-t, usaf. i have always been an underdog. i dont fight fair.
but the fact is anyone who is offended shouldnt be. nothing was said toward anyone other than u-t. he is trying to drag my name through the mud b/c that is how he is.
bleedingorange, where ya at here bud? i need a witness here.
i have talked to u plenty of times usaf and never once have i bad mouthed the soldiers.