If Strong can win at UofL he can win at Texas...he cleaned house his first year so I think he gets at least a few more.
UT has been irrelevant for a long time now and those big boosters are probably losing patience especially having to see little brother in College Station have all that success.
Stats vs Rice:
![]()
TX is really bad and, if not for that crappy conference, they will be lucky to make a bowl game.
He doesn't have his ace recruiter he had at Louisville. He is alienating TX HS coaches. What recruiting successes he has had in TX are kids (or their families) who just want to play at TX. Of his famed "Florida 5" from the 2015 class, only one is on campus. He's recruiting a lot of marginal players who are grade risks. The job at TX is too big for CS IMO.
I picked BG since they're at home, but I think BG is due for a letdown game. This one might be it.
Saw the turnovers. I also saw the yards they gained, the time of possession, the total plays, etc etc. Wasn't questioning how they lost. Obviously mistakes at some point turning it over. Questioning how you move the ball that much (and well), yet turn it over four times and mess up the game.
That's not true at all. Steve Kragthorpe coached three seasons after Petrino left. Strong built Louisville basically from the ground up. He brought in a ton of guys with serious talent such as Bridgewater and Devante Parker. They don't have a quarterback right now. Hopefully they don't figure it out either. Would love to see the Cardinals go 5-7 or so this season, although I'd take 0-12.
Stats vs Rice:
![]()
TX is really bad and, if not for that crappy conference, they will be lucky to make a bowl game.
He doesn't have his ace recruiter he had at Louisville. He is alienating TX HS coaches. What recruiting successes he has had in TX are kids (or their families) who just want to play at TX. Of his famed "Florida 5" from the 2015 class, only one is on campus. He's recruiting a lot of marginal players who are grade risks. The job at TX is too big for CS IMO.
With 4 TO's created, TX likely started with short fields or had defensive TD's. Therefore, skewing their offensive numbers. We had better offensive stats than UF in the 2008 game; meant very little when the final was 30-6.
Yes. 4 turnovers is bad, but Rice pretty much handed Texas 21 direct points off special teams/defense. Add in one 70 yard TD, and that's an easy 28 points. Outside of the first drive Texas I don't think they had a single sustained drives.
Rice lost the turnover battle, but they made it worse with special team blunders, field position, and giving up a few explosive plays leading to short/easy drives.