Where does everyone stand on Candace Owens?

#26
#26
She's great, it's refreshing to hear someone speak the truth and not just looking to be a victim. She actually wants whats best for blacks unlike the race pimps and fake SJW wannabes.

She was a victim when she sued for being discriminated against.

She is just smart enough to to know racist rubes like you eat up a black person saying ignorant things they think.

She's very intelligent, and I agree with many of her takes and stances. But her issue is her abrasiveness, she does a lot for shock value but if her goal is to communicate or get buy in from the a African American community she'd be better served to soften the rhetoric some.

The whole goal is shock value. Rile up the libs and black people and her racist audience she is bleeding dry eats it up. She does not want buy in from or care about the black community.

I feel like she is paraded out too much as "see? A black person feels like this!" chess piece but I commend her for speaking an unpopular opinion and not budging.
That is literally the reason she exists.

She is a prop. She is just the newest version of Jason Whitlock or David Clarke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#28
#28
You have an issue with reading comprehension. She said what Hitler was doing in Germany was "fine"....the problem is that he wanted to Globalize. He wanted everyone to look a certain way.

Of course when I wrote that she said Hitlers actions were noble, that is paraphrasing. Do you know what paraphrasing means?

You weren't paraphrasing, you were completely distorting what she said.
 
#29
#29
You have an issue with reading comprehension. She said what Hitler was doing in Germany was "fine"....the problem is that he wanted to Globalize. He wanted everyone to look a certain way.

Of course when I wrote that she said Hitlers actions were noble, that is paraphrasing. Do you know what paraphrasing means?
I know exactly what paraphrasing is. I also know what mischaracterization is too. See your initial post I quoted as an example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 615vols
#31
#31
It's interesting how people can turn on one another simply because they don't toe the line.
That is the public training agenda now. Keep us all mad at each other and in each other’s business so that we don’t pay attention to the ass holes in both parties continually screwing up and screwing us over.
 
#35
#35
She was a victim when she sued for being discriminated against.

She is just smart enough to to know racist rubes like you eat up a black person saying ignorant things they think.



The whole goal is shock value. Rile up the libs and black people and her racist audience she is bleeding dry eats it up. She does not want buy in from or care about the black community.


That is literally the reason she exists.

She is a prop. She is just the newest version of Jason Whitlock or David Clarke.
I always enjoy when you leftists have to resort to calling everyone a racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1
#39
#39
Thats some pretty dumb sh** you just said
Is this the same candace owens that said hitlers actions were noble? The same woman that says that racism doesn't exist, after she enlisted the help of the NAACP to sue the Stamford Public Schools for racial harassment. Shes a grifter. Shes an intellectual lightweight.
 
#41
#41
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#42
#42
Half the time these people wont even let her speak. Anti fascist indeed
 
#43
#43
I always enjoy when you leftists have to resort to calling everyone a racist.
is that kind of like when those on the right label people as thugs, on drugs, on welfare, lazy, or antifa? Like that? Trying to get a baseline so that I will know how to apply your logic.
 
#44
#44
good old clarification card. The right was applauding her when she initially made the comments. Then she clarified what she meant, and the right still applauded. Me thinks they will applaud anything. If it was stupid why not say it was stupid. You know, if you said it was a dumbass comment.....she would not like you any less.

However for context, throughout history, there are always individuals of the oppressed group that will identify with and defend their oppressor. Candace is not the first, nor will she be the last. The Association of German National Jews is one example. Slaves that alerted the slave master to the plans of the other slaves are other examples. It's as if renouncing your identity will somehow curry favor with those that oppress you. I refuse to believe that any segment of society that categorizes me as anything has my best interest at heart. Those are not my allies. However I will keep those individuals close for a purpose.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: k-town_king
#45
#45
is that kind of like when those on the right label people as thugs, on drugs, on welfare, lazy, or antifa? Like that? Trying to get a baseline so that I will know how to apply your logic.
Rioters are thugs, sorry if that hurts your little feelings. I know how much you admire the good work they do. Most dems/antifa/commies are lazy and worthless. I get some blacks and white guilt dems get upset when a black person leaves the plantation and is willing to call things like they are, for many of you the truth hurts. You all worship the like of St George and race pimps like Al Sharpton, fact is she is way better than they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#47
#47
Is this the same candace owens that said hitlers actions were noble? The same woman that says that racism doesn't exist, after she enlisted the help of the NAACP to sue the Stamford Public Schools for racial harassment. Shes a grifter. Shes an intellectual lightweight.
I'm no Candace Owen's fan, but her comments about Hitler were taken out of context. Not exactly the wisest subject to be touching on for someone known to be a bull in a china shop rather than having the precision of a Swiss watch maker or a brain surgeon, but still, taken out of context.
 
#49
#49
"You know, he was a National Socialist, but if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay fine," she said. "The problem is he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German."

She knows her audience. They eat it up.
Oh, so you read the quote and still mischaracterizes her.

Stop making me defend Candace Owens.
 
#50
#50
Oh, so you read the quote and still mischaracterizes her.

Stop making me defend Candace Owens.
I read the quote and paraphrased what she said. She said that what he was doing in Germany was fine. It is when he tried to Globalize his actions is when it was bad. How is that mischaraterizing her? Those are her words. As one of her champions pointed out, she came back later and said Hitler is bad, he was a psychopath. But her original comments and her clarification are different subjects. She claims that she was trying pointing out the difference between nationalism and globalization.
 

VN Store



Back
Top