BUBear
Football On The Brazos
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 7,230
- Likes
- 4,324
Just like last year, this year is a great reminder of why we don’t need to expand the playoffs. The playoffs were never intended to let all conference champs have a shot. They were solely intended to avoid a situation like 2004 where you had 3 undefeated Power 5 teams and Auburn didn’t get a chance to play for the title. This year you have 3 teams that are clearly better than the rest and all 3 will get a chance to win it all. There’s a big drop off to team 4 and I, for one, don’t want to argue who gets the chance to win a national title between the likes Georgia (assuming they lose), Florida, Penn St, Auburn, the OU/Baylor loser, etc. It’s hard enough to find 4 quality teams for the playoff. 8 would greatly diminish the importance of the regular season, scheduling good out of conference games, and the conference championship games. We’ve already seen these trends with the current format. Expanding it will make it worse.
Do you have any discussion points?
Hope Utah puts a beating on Oregon. They've blown out most of their opponents this season, minus Washington & USC. They will be the more deserving team if they win. OU and Baylor have struggled with some pretty mediocre teams - TCU, Texas, KSU and even Tech. Would rather watch a team with an actual defense.
Of course someone like UF can beat any of the top 4 but it isn’t very likely and even less likely to win 3+ games required to win the title with 8 or more teams.1. If it's 3 deserving teams and 1 non deserving team then the 1 seed gets a free ride to the champ game.
2. I disagree that the separation between #'s 1,2,3 and 4 - 8 is as great as you think. OU, UTAH, UF and even a losing GA could beat the Top 3 in a given game.
3. If we followed your lead the NCAA basketball tourney would only need 4 - 8 teams.
It's telling that FBS is the only major NCAA sport without a real tourney format. 8 is the minimum it should be regardless of whether it's P5 conf champs + 3 at large or Top 8 overall.
Of course someone like UF can beat any of the top 4 but it isn’t very likely and even less likely to win 3+ games required to win the title with 8 or more teams.
Basketball is entirely different. You have 350 teams and upsets are more likely due to the impact one player can have. You talk about college football being different as a bad thing but isn’t the fact that it is different and that the regular season means everything part of why people love college football?
However, I sort of agree with your thinking if expansion is inevitable as I believe it is. Let’s go full NCAA tournament like basketball and let 16 teams in. All 10 conference champs get auto bids and then 6 at-large.
The PAC has been rather craptastic this season. The winner of Baylor/OU will have a Top Ten win...Utah won't.Hope Utah puts a beating on Oregon (Auburn couldn't it). They've blown out most of their opponents this season, minus Washington (7-5 team)& USC (lost to 3rd string QB). They will be the more deserving team if they win. OU and Baylor have struggled with some pretty mediocre teams - TCU, Texas (scored 38 on LSU), KSU (most likely ranked in final CFP rankings after this weekend) and even Tech. Would rather watch a team with an actual defense (Baylor's defense is ranked 13th in scoring, held every opponent below their season average, tied for 1st in takeaways with 40 , DC is one of five finalists for Frank Broyles Award).
I see. You said sport so I assumed you were referring t other sports, not different division of the same sport. I still like it where the regular season means more. The more teams get in the playoff the less important the regular season becomes. I’m not saying it isn’t important at all but with 8 teams you can lose twice and still make it.I'm not talking about college football being different - I'm talking about one single division of college football not only being different from other college sports but every other division of college football.