Who is John Galt, and why should you care?

#26
#26
I get it, John McCain has a higher percentage (not to mention higher actual dollar amount) of his funds for which he has provided no disclosure than does Barack Obama.
That comment makes absolutely ZERO sense.
 
#28
#28
RealUT and BPV, I decided to breathe some life into the book thread in the pub with our posts.
 
#29
#29
DUBIOUS DONATIONS - New York Post

The average contribution to Obama in September was just under $86. And federal law only requires the disclosure of identifying information for contributions in excess of $200. Campaigns must keep running totals for each donor and report them once they exceed $200.

The Federal Election Commission says the Obama campaign has reported well over $200 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only a small portion of that sum is attributable to donors the Obama campaign has disclosed.

No presidential campaign has ever before received such a gargantuan sum of money from unidentified contributors.
 
#30
#30
1. Can McCain receive donations or is this old news?

2. Good for Obama, so yes allvol, take that as defense of Obama.

no suprising from you libs/crooks. you've been stealing for years. what a little more stealing. that's why i say libs should be hung for treason.
 
#34
#34
I think Objectivism is a load of crap.

I think that certain individuals would benefit from reading her works and gaining some personal empowerment from aspects of her philosophy. But, as a widespread philosophy or a model of governing, I completely agree. I can't stand some of what she comes off with...
 

VN Store



Back
Top