volfanbill
pack light and love heavy…
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Messages
- 44,466
- Likes
- 31,448
Who's defense is better Bills or Seattle's?
The Seahawks would do the same thing they did in Week 1. The Packers aren't physical enough to beat them, plain and simple.
Seattle's, but don't try and pretend that buffalo's is terrible or something. They're still in the top 5 statistically. But that doesn't mean that the packers would play worse against seattle's defense.... Which I know is what you are trying to suggest here.
Just like this isn't the same Seattle team from the middle third of the season, this isn't the same Packers team from the first four weeks.
They've never really been a physical team. I would argue that they are more physical than they have even been, especially if you consider Lacy.
Seattle has struggled against good offenses. Fortunately for them, they haven't played one in quite awhile. As I said a couple pages back, you could list the Patriots, Seahawks and Packers in any order and have an easily defensible argument. I just think Rodgers can break apart the defense enough to cause them problem. A shootout does not bode well for the Seahawks imo.
VFB, what the hell are you talking about? The Seahawks held the Broncos and Packers to 20 or less, have given up 30 points 3 times in 2 years and you're talking about how this might be a shootout where it's easy for the Packers to score?
Outside of the Week 1 match up how many good quarterbacks has Seattle faced this season?
Phillip Rivers threw for 284 yards and 3 TDs. Tony Romo went 21-32 and 2 TDs. Peyton also threw for over 300 yards in the loss. Yea, it's easy to look great against the Panthers, Giants, Niners (of this year), Raiders and teams using back up quarterbacks. I've said all along that Seattle is one of the best three, but they haven't proven invincible.