Who misses east and west divisions?

#28
#28
I'm actually glad the divisions are gone. The new format has everyone playing everyone else equally (besides your one permanent rival). So I would rather NOT play half the conference every year but only play other division rivals once every couple years. Plus GA got away with only playing AL in the SECT while we played them every year. New set up seems more fair to me.
Texas is especially glad for the new format.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: EZE
#29
#29
I certainly do. I’d like to see:

East
Tennessee
Alabama
Auburn
Florida
South Carolina
Vandy
Kentucky
Georgia

West
Texas
A&M
Missouri
Arkansas
Oklahoma
Mississippi state
Ole miss
LSU
They wouldn’t put Tn, Bama, and UGA in the same division. I think it should have been just OU and Texas in I different divisions and they play annually like UT-Bama. I would like divisions back
 
#32
#32
This would have been a brutal year for divisions. The East you outlined above in particular would be insane this year.
I wish we had divisions.

However, the only teams we’ll be missing are USC Jr and Auburn. They say our SOS is 35th so far.

I wouldn’t want to have to play Texas, A&M, Ole Miss, Missouri, and LSU either. The SEC is brutal no matter how you look at it. Even the schools with the easiest of schedules took their L’s.
 
#41
#41
I'd like to go back to this SEC setup and play a 9-game conference schedule.

Tennessee
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
Auburn
LSU
Mississippi State
Vanderbilt
 
#42
#42
This would keep the rivalry games down to once per year. It would be weird if Tennessee played Alabama or Florida twice because of the championship game or imagine the iron bowl twice.
 

VN Store



Back
Top