Heupel is a very likeable coach and also seems to be a high integrity coach. He has also accomplished some great things over the past 4 years. At the same time, there is nothing wrong with setting high expectations as fans.
We have used the same excuse for all post Fulmer coaches: poor coach, it’s not his fault, the previous coach left a dumpster fire. However, after 3-4, years, we started to question those coaches. No reason why we can’t at least start asking some questions about year 5. This next year will be 100% on CJH. No excuses about previous coaches. It’s his team, his players, his philosophy and his culture.
The offense seems to be broken whether it’s due to players, schemes, play calling, etc, it has been sub par for the past 2 years. Yes, I know our rushing yards is up there and our average scoring is decent, but the problem is that we aren’t scoring at the right place at the right time when we urgently need to score - namely against more talented teams.
The defense has certainly improved but we still struggle to get off the field and our secondary still gets burned. I also don’t see a lot of creative scheme adjustments.
I don’t dislike Heupel, but I think he also needs to be held accountable for the product he gets paid handsomely to bring to the table. Whether improvements needed justify coaching changes or not will be on CJH, but the honeymoon is over for year 5.