By the time we played and lost to UGA a second time, it wasn't nearly the bad loss on the floor it was the first time. Apart from us and perhaps as much as us, the dawgs may be the most improved team in the conference from the first half of the year. More and more, I'm hearing the word 'conference contender' attached to them for next season. I certainly don't think we should've dropped that first one, but so far I haven't noticed a post in this thread - in response to the OP's question - that simply gives UGA a little credit for having greatly improved.