Why do 90+% of American blacks vote for Democrats?

#1
gsvol

gsvol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
14,179
Likes
11
#1
It seems counter intuitive.

For Black America a time for choosing: belief in the Democrat Party or belief in God

Democrats have had a war against African Americans for 200 years. The Democrat Party’s most notable “Founding Father” was Aaron Burr a man who plotted with Democrat Andrew Jackson to steal the Louisiana Territories to break them up and make new slave states out of them.

James Polk, a Democrat President actually traded in slaves while he was president and fired the permanent civil service staff so he could have his slaves wait on him in our White House.

Through the years Democrats have picked up guns to maintain slavery and formed the Klu Klux Klan to keep freed slaves in virtual bondage after they were freed.

Woodrow Wilson brought Jim Crowe Laws to Washington where there were intact middle class Black families thriving and being supported by fathers who were working for the federal government. Democrat Wilson ended that and segregated the federal workforce.

Democrat Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” has turned out to be just a cynical trick. When he signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act (passed only with Republican votes in the Senate) Johnson proudly * remarked, “I’ll have them N^$$#@s voting Democrat for the next two hundred years.”

He had no intention of helping Black people, just getting their votes. The “Great Society” has destroyed the African American family and caused Black illegitimacy rates to skyrocket.
(not to mention abortion rates)
-------------------------

... (Democrats) have been taking advantage of Black people for two hundred years.
Click to expand...
 
#4
#4
If my kids are any reflection on what is coming out of the Black community, they have been booing Obama lately. After he was elected the school routinely handed out Obama t-shirts and posters as rewards for good behavior, now, not so much.
 
#5
#5
Same could be said about poor people. Why do the majority or lower class people, especially in the South, vote republican? Also seems counter-intuitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6
#6
Why do 90+% of American blacks vote for Democrats?

. . . because there are so many people like gsvol in the Republican Party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7
#7
because Dems have convinced them they are the party that cares about minorities when they prevent most from moving forward. They'll vote for whomever their leaders tell them to
 
#8
#8
Well, Chatanooga lawyer John Wolfe received 42% last night in Ark! That in itself should be an indicment on the Obama campaign!
 
#11
#11
don't dems make a similar argument along the lines of, "why do poor, white people in the South vote for Republicans? the implication being that they're always opting against their interests b/c republican policies don't help poor people.
 
#12
#12
dreVol said:
don't dems make a similar argument along the lines of, "why do poor, white people in the South vote for Republicans? the implication being that they're always opting against their interests b/c republican policies don't help poor people.
Click to expand...

They help them because republicans give them more freedom.

Or so I hear
 
#16
#16
GoBigOrangeUT said:
Same could be said about poor people. Why do the majority or lower class people, especially in the South, vote republican? Also seems counter-intuitive.
Click to expand...

Why would you say that?

At least you admit it is counter-intuitive for blacks to vote dhimmirat.






Abe Hoffman said:
Why do 90+% of American blacks vote for Democrats?

. . . because there are so many people like gsvol in the Republican Party.
Click to expand...

But I'm not in the Republican party.

BTW, what's the matter with me pal?






tkemo said:
We have a winner
Click to expand...

"Republicans have leaders, Democrats have bosses."
Harry Truman





therealUT said:
Liberty: the ability to do what you want, so long as it is within the confines of just law.
Click to expand...

FYP.

FWIW

In 1654, John Casor, an African, became the first legally recognized slave in the present United States. In his freedom suit, he claimed that he was an indentured servant who had been held past his term. A court in Northampton County ruled against Casor, declaring him property for life and “owned” by his master, the free black colonist Anthony Johnson.
 
#17
#17
Far left is equality, they will force everyone to be equal. Far right is freedom, there is no one to protect you survival of the fittest. Maybe blacks vote closer to the left because they want to be treated more equally or make up for a crappy past. A problem with the far right is there is also no one to protect you and the established guys with power will own you. So, I say they stay middle left just to keep on keepin on in the attempts of equality or retribution for some of the past. IDK.... Civil Rights have been passed under the Demo party.
 
#18
#18
DjCrenshaw said:
Far left is equality, they will force everyone to be equal. Far right is freedom, there is no one to protect you survival of the fittest. Maybe blacks vote closer to the left because they want to be treated more equally or make up for a crappy past. A problem with the far right is there is also no one to protect you and the established guys with power will own you. So, I say they stay middle left just to keep on keepin on in the attempts of equality or retribution for some of the past. IDK.... Civil Rights have been passed under the Demo party.
Click to expand...

Wow, is this what is being taught now?
 
#20
#20
DjCrenshaw said:
Far left is equality, they will force everyone to be equal. Far right is freedom, there is no one to protect you survival of the fittest. Maybe blacks vote closer to the left because they want to be treated more equally or make up for a crappy past. A problem with the far right is there is also no one to protect you and the established guys with power will own you. So, I say they stay middle left just to keep on keepin on in the attempts of equality or retribution for some of the past. IDK.... Civil Rights have been passed under the Demo party.
Click to expand...


what an ignorant post. civil right would not have passed without republicans.

the fact is dems promise welfare programs and have designed the system that keeps minorities and poor people stuck in welfare. when you reward single moms for having multiple babies, what is the motiviation to succeed on your own.
 
#23
#23
gsvol said:
Why would you say that?

At least you admit it is counter-intuitive for blacks to vote dhimmirat.








But I'm not in the Republican party.

BTW, what's the matter with me pal?








"Republicans have leaders, Democrats have bosses."
Harry Truman







FYP.

FWIW

In 1654, John Casor, an African, became the first legally recognized slave in the present United States. In his freedom suit, he claimed that he was an indentured servant who had been held past his term. A court in Northampton County ruled against Casor, declaring him property for life and “owned” by his master, the free black colonist Anthony Johnson.
Click to expand...

So you don't refute the facts I presented? At least we agree on something.
 
#24
#24
DjCrenshaw said:
Far left is equality, they will force everyone to be equal. Far right is freedom, there is no one to protect you survival of the fittest. Maybe blacks vote closer to the left because they want to be treated more equally or make up for a crappy past. A problem with the far right is there is also no one to protect you and the established guys with power will own you. So, I say they stay middle left just to keep on keepin on in the attempts of equality or retribution for some of the past. IDK.... Civil Rights have been passed under the Demo party.
Click to expand...

You must not have read my original post.

Republican Dwight Eisenhower did more for African Americans that any four democrat presidents.

Democrat Woodrow Wilson set back racial integration and race relations by a half century.

It's true the voting rights act was passed under Democrat Johnson, democrat Robert Byrd (admitedly a KKK member) filibustered against the bill and it was only passed with Republican support. The Republicans voted for the voting rights act at a higher percentage rate for their party than did the Democrats.





therealUT said:
Justice is based upon (is a derivative of) rights; liberty is a right; therefore, including justice in the definition of liberty is invalid (it is begging the question).
Click to expand...

If you are going to have civil order then there must be some laws to regulate individual behavior, ie; no rape, robbery, murder etc. and if you violate such legal code then you are subject to loosing your liberty. In that respect liberty has it's limits.

Fortunately in this country we have the Constitution and Bill of Rights that prevents government from infringing on individual liberties.

Unfortunately we have increasingly come under the influence of progressive socialist thinking which is very willing to ignore the constitution and puts collective liberty ahead of individual liberty which is one of the corner stones of the Constitution.




GoBigOrangeUT said:
So you don't refute the facts I presented? At least we agree on something.
Click to expand...

What facts??

I agree you gave your opinion, that certainly doesn't make it a fact by any means.

And no I don't agree with your opinion.

052212.jpg
 
#25
#25
gsvol said:
If you are going to have civil order then there must be some laws to regulate individual behavior, ie; no rape, robbery, murder etc. and if you violate such legal code then you are subject to loosing your liberty. In that respect liberty has it's limits.
Click to expand...

According to the Founding Fathers and their philosophical inspirations, liberty was only constrained by a higher order value: life (which, for Locke, including property) and immediate physical security; i.e., the right to liberty is superseded by the right to life (not any "right to civil order": tyrannies have plenty of civil order).

gsvol said:
Fortunately in this country we have the Constitution and Bill of Rights that prevents government from infringing on individual liberties.
Click to expand...

Signing and ratifying treaties, any treaty, is allowed by the Constitution. Thus, what is your grievance if Obama signs these treaties and 2/3 of the Senate ratify?

gsvol said:
Unfortunately we have increasingly come under the influence of progressive socialist thinking which is very willing to ignore the constitution and puts collective liberty ahead of individual liberty which is one of the corner stones of the Constitution.
Click to expand...

Who is ignoring the Constitution? Signing said treaties is acting in accord with the Constitution; it is not acting in accord with an actual theory of liberty (but, you continually discard the notion of liberty sans law).

Note: The Southern members of the Constitutional Delegation ensured that "collective liberty" actually took precedence over "individual liberty" when they demanded that slavery remain in effect and that slaves only count as 3/5 of a person.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top